frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Why Trump is abandoning US hegemony – and that's probably good [audio]

https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/hugh-white-hard-new-world-end-of-us-global-order/
1•michaelhoney•4m ago•1 comments

Enabling enhanced security for your app

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/Xcode/enabling-enhanced-security-for-your-app
1•transpute•11m ago•0 comments

AIWisdom

1•MyAIFriend•11m ago•1 comments

atproto-os - Web Desktops on the AT Protocol

https://github.com/atproto-os
1•dxlliv•15m ago•1 comments

GPT-4.5 preview in the OpenAI API will be shut down on July 14, 2025

https://platform.openai.com/docs/deprecations#2025-04-14-gpt-4-5-preview
1•peterdavehello•16m ago•0 comments

Waymo recalls more than 1,200 automated vehicles after minor crashes

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-05-14/waymo-recalls-more-than-1-200-automated-vehicles-after-minor-crashes
2•andsoitis•19m ago•1 comments

Cross-social networks

https://yeldar.org/blog/cross-social-networks/
1•yeldar•23m ago•0 comments

Sound Static Data Race Verification for C [pdf]

https://patricklam.ca/papers/25.toplas.data-race-empirical.pdf
1•luu•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Kabit – A habit tracker

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/habit-tracker-kabit/id6511250768
1•iamrahulrao•24m ago•0 comments

Is embracing AI intellectual or anti-intellectual?

https://hollisrobbinsanecdotal.substack.com/p/is-embracing-ai-intellectual-or-anti
2•HR01•25m ago•0 comments

ECG-Image-Kit: A toolkit for analysis, synthesis, and digitization of ECG images

https://github.com/alphanumericslab/ecg-image-kit
1•teleforce•27m ago•0 comments

Rules, Not Renewables, Might Explain the Iberian Blackout

https://spectrum.ieee.org/spain-grid-failure
2•pseudolus•27m ago•0 comments

Mind Donation

https://blog.ayjay.org/brain-donation/
1•blueridge•31m ago•1 comments

California bill targets masked officers

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/officers-who-cover-their-faces-could-be-charged-with-a-misdemeanor-under-california-proposal/ar-AA1GPMyt
1•eligrid•32m ago•0 comments

Law as Rhetoric, Rhetoric as Law: The Arts of Cultural and Communal Life (1985) [pdf]

https://www.lwionline.org/sites/default/files/2016-09/v5%20White.pdf
1•akkartik•33m ago•0 comments

Stories from development of Grand Theft Auto series

https://web.archive.org/web/20231122204504/https://insiderockstarnorth.blogspot.com/
2•ibobev•35m ago•0 comments

Costco tests the waters with a stand-alone gas station for members

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/costco-tests-the-waters-with-a-stand-alone-gas-station-for-members/ar-AA1GPMXM
1•eligrid•38m ago•0 comments

Enrichment Data Testing Guide

https://blog.peopledatalabs.com/post/enrichment-data-testing-guide
1•mooreds•45m ago•0 comments

I Have Embraced Absurdism

https://feld.com/archives/2025/06/i-have-embraced-absurdism/
1•mooreds•49m ago•0 comments

MultiTerminalCodeViz

https://github.com/gkamradt/MultiTerminalCodeViz
1•handfuloflight•50m ago•0 comments

It's Not a Race

https://mintlify.com/blog/its-not-a-race
1•mooreds•51m ago•0 comments

The Science of Word Recognition (2022)

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/develop/word-recognition
2•ripe•57m ago•1 comments

Hard-to-recycle thermoset waste plastics reborn as hydrogen

https://techxplore.com/news/2025-06-hard-recycle-thermoset-plastics-reborn.html
1•PaulHoule•58m ago•0 comments

University of New Mexico bayoneting incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_New_Mexico_bayoneting_incident
2•burnt-resistor•59m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Why are PDFs so hard to edit?

2•superconduct123•1h ago•4 comments

'flight simulator' for seed startup investing

https://pitchine.com/
5•ssunboyy•1h ago•0 comments

Matt Yglesias on Debating

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2025/06/matt-yglesias-on-debating.html
1•mathattack•1h ago•0 comments

Apple Watch ECG app: what is it, how does it work and is it accurate (2024)

https://www.wareable.com/apple/how-to-take-ecg-reading-on-apple-watch-6817
1•teleforce•1h ago•0 comments

electron-liquid-glass: Electron bindings for Apple Liquid Glass

https://github.com/Meridius-Labs/electron-liquid-glass
2•amadeuspagel•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Go-parser-combinators – DIY parsing toolkit for Go devs

https://github.com/tuannh982/go-parser-combinators
2•tuannh982•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

What Happens When Clergy Take Psilocybin

https://nautil.us/clergy-blown-away-by-psilocybin-1217112/
73•bookofjoe•5h ago

Comments

quantified•5h ago
Pretty much nothing of substance in the writeup. All about studying and flaws.
jbm•4h ago
Yeah I was honestly taken aback with how devoid of content this was. No personal stories or research.

The New Yorker version looks more interesting.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/05/26/this-is-your-p...

Kilenaitor•4h ago
Also has a way better headline heh
swyx•2h ago
michael pollan, one of the best in the biz
electroglyph•2h ago
heh, didn't expect this line:

Finding willing rabbis, however, was easy—the challenge was finding ones who were “psychedelically naïve.”

cluckindan•1h ago
There are videos of such religious devotees riding around cities in a van, blasting psychedelic trance, and stopping at lights to dance around the intersection, offering acid to onlookers.
nikcub•2h ago
this should probably be OP - much better original story, not a reblog, and it's written by Michael Pollan.
elevaet•4h ago
I had to scroll up and down for a while, looking for the rest of the article. There wasn't any.
bookofjoe•3h ago
Here you go: https://archive.ph/2Za2J
RobRivera•2h ago
Yea I was wondering if there was some UI issue on mobile bc I kept scrolling down expecting more.

I stopped and read the whole thing to be disappointed.

A blurb about [thing i am interested in].

I now feel like yelling at some clouds.

quantified•15m ago
I feel badly that I didn't warn you sufficiently.
anigbrowl•1h ago
Yeah, total clickbait
worik•5h ago
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_Chapel_Experiment
worik•5h ago
I am no fan of Timothy Leary, I think he put the cause of Psychedelics back decades. He was also a very flawed researcher, which effected this study.

Nevertheless, it was ground breaking for 1962 and had a huge impact.

Not so significant in the twenty first century.

chiefgeek•3h ago
Yes. Came here to to say this has been done before. It was too much for the Establishment to stomach. Ram Dass, Tim Leary’s associate (Richard Alpert at the time) talks about it here - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ram-dass-here-and-now/...
bravesoul2•5h ago
> Almost a decade ago, a Baptist Biblical scholar, a Catholic priest, several rabbis, an Islamic leader, a Zen Buddhist roshi, and more than a dozen other religious leaders walked into a lab—and took high doses of magic mushrooms.

Wild. Maybe what the world needs.

BitwiseFool•4h ago
Quite frankly, that quote sounds like the premise of some new Netflix original series.
neilv•4h ago
Also, an old joke format, presumably done intentionally by the writer.

Example: "A priest, a rabbi, and an atheist walk into a bar..."

867-5309•3h ago
"...and say ouch! it was an iron bar"
jjulius•4h ago
>Maybe what the world needs.

One line that's been recurring between my wife and I for the past half-decade or so is that the whole planet needs a good hotboxing.

robocat•3h ago
That's the scattergun controlled approach of seeing like a state - give everyone medication even though it's only some that need it.

There's a small percentage ruining it for most: a few defectors when most are cooperators.

How do we identify the defectors?

What do you do if you identify defectors?

Spivak•3h ago
It's maybe inefficient to hotbox everyone but I think I would rather that than give my government the green light to define and identify defectors.

If humanity has proven one thing over and over and over again to itself it's that we're terrible at witch hunts.

shiroiuma•3h ago
>There's a small percentage ruining it for most: a few defectors when most are cooperators.

>What do you do if you identify defectors?

Simple: you put them in charge of the government. That's what we do now, after all.

gsf_emergency•2h ago
So we just need to hotbox the people running gov :)
pasquinelli•57m ago
you're being too fixated on individuals. everyone's doing the same thing: avoiding pain, uncertainty, and the limitation of their future choices; seeking pleasure, security, and to increase their future choices. the very few people who aren't doing that don't matter: history unfolds because people do what makes sense for them, not because some don't.
ElijahLynn•2h ago
Exactly.
readthenotes1•5h ago
"William James, considered the father of American psychology ...., is said to have to come to many of his own most central ideas at least in part through hallucinatory experiences with nitrous oxide"

That's a pretty good explainer for psychology. We have a Coke addled Freud who is the father of it all and another drug abuser shepherding the USA.

I wonder how many people have tried to replicate their experiments and succeeded?

kevinsync•4h ago
Yeah, keep in mind that significant abuse of the drugs mentioned are, uh, let's say, prone to inflating the ego rather than killing it and showing a different path.

Kinda fills in some unspoken gaps about the 'discipline' of psychology...

hsbauauvhabzb•4h ago
Can you explain this for those of us with minimal background in psychology? Is there a substantial amount of pseudoscience in modern psychology, or just historically?
7thaccount•4h ago
This is a little blunt, but I knew a lot of people who went into psychology and got degrees. They were not very gifted academically (C students in highschool) and went into psych as it was an easy major that let them coast and party for four years. I'm sure this isn't the case for all psychology majors of course, but it was very different on average than what I was used to in engineering or the hard sciences where you generally had 4 years of excruciating math classes including calculus and differential equations that weeded out most.

Psychology is very dependent on statistics and experiments. That can be complicated and after going through those classes I simply don't trust the majority of students (or their professors) to get any of that right. It's why I roll my eyes every time the radio guy talks about the results of another pop psych study. I knew some psych majors big into new age crystal stuff and legitimately believed it all as well as a bunch of additional pseudoscience garbage. That kind of thing is a lot more rare in say physics where it's really hard to get through the program without a rational brain.

Again, there are probably some brilliant folks drawn to that field who knows how to do solid research, but my experiences suggest that the signal to noise ratio may be suspect.

hsbauauvhabzb•3h ago
I appreciate your honesty, blunt or not that’s an interesting perspective.
BeetleB•3h ago
Psych majors with just a BS degree - totally agree with you.

PhDs, though - some more rigor is involved. Definitely not C-grade level folks (or if they were, they've rectified that problem). But still, we do have a replication crisis...

thayne•3h ago
Psychology has a pretty significant reproducibility crisis.

From what I've seen as an outsider, a lot of studies are taken as fact without any confirmation with attempts to reproduce the results. And many results suffer from questionable methodology.

A big part of the problem is that doing psychology well is really, really hard. You are dealing with human subjects, which means there are a lot of ethical and regulatory constraints. A lot of experiments that might give you important insights are unethical and/or illegal. Getting people to participate in studies is difficult and expensive, which means sample sizes are often much smaller than they should be. And there are often significant biases in the population sampled (I believe most psychology studies are done on college students... often psychology students). And then there is the inherent complexity of the subject. Every person's brain is different, and finding general rules that apply to the incredible diversity of human minds is very, very difficult. And finally, I suspect that a lot of psychologists are not trained in statistics and experimental methodology to the same degree as scientists in "harder" sciences.

kevinsync•3h ago
I can't really speak for psychology as a field other than a spectator, but I find it to be quite subjective. What I really meant was related to cocaine and nitrous oxide -- two very different substances that both result in wild egos, wild ideas, hard-to-sustain invincibility and a host of other effects, unlike psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, DMT, etc) which are arguably closer to (and provide) positive psychological responses / breakthroughs / perspectives.

For a current-times look into nitrous, observe Kanye West. The rumor mill (plus believable evidence) suggests he is out of his MIND on large amounts of N2O frequently, and his erratic and grandiose behavior reinforces the idea. That's probably not ideal for American psychology if "the father" of it is similarly whacked lol.

For a historical look into cocaine, observe Sigmund Freud. There was a great book called Cocaine: An Unauthorized Biography [0] by Dominic Streatfeild, the second-third of which covers Freud's discovery and promotion of cocaine as a cure-all.

TL;DR Freud was searching for a drug, any drug, that hadn't been claimed yet by a scientific promoter to then market as his own for fame and fortune, stumbled upon cocaine (hydrochloride, not freebase), started doing a lot of it, proselytizing it (it could cure your heroin addiction!) etc, before the whole thing kind of collapsed around him.

While arguably fun, it's a substance that is the polar opposite of "introspection" and drives a lot of behavior that honestly a person might seek a therapist or psychologist to resolve LOL, so for a psychologist to promote it early in his career who eventually progresses into more or less defining psychology as a field, well ... I just find it curious and would wonder what theories Freud would have put forth had he come to be in a time with psychedelics available instead. That's all!

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocaine:_An_Unauthorized_Biogr...

clipsy•4h ago
> That's a pretty good explainer for psychology. We have a Coke addled Freud who is the father of it all and another drug abuser shepherding the USA.

Now do tech CEOs

quantified•3h ago
The Hebrew writings include some instances of God appearing from fire or smoke. Exactly what was burning? I've read what I consider rumors that there are DMT-containing shrubs in that part of the world.
caycep•4h ago
a corollary is - can a clergy still practice if implanted with a neuromodulator device, i.e. deep brain stimulation, for epilepsy, or Parkinson's, or depression?
xwowsersx•4h ago
Promising title, but the article felt hollow... all surface, no depth. Skimmed anecdotes without probing them, offered no real insight or new perspective, and left me with absolutely nothing I couldn't have guessed from the headline alone :(
aspenmayer•3h ago
There’s also this guy who you might have heard of, who created a little thing called Alcoholics Anonymous:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_W.#Psychedelic_therapy

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5922.13027

Apparently he was so serious about the potential for LSD to help alcoholics, that he almost got thrown out of Alcoholics Anonymous, the recovery group he helped create. He had written to a Catholic friend about this.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/23/lsd-help-alc...

> LSD, by mimicking insanity, could help alcoholics achieve a central tenet of the Twelve Step programme proposed by AA, he believed. It was a matter of finding "a power greater than ourselves" that "could restore us to sanity". He warned: "I don't believe [LSD] has any miraculous property of transforming spiritually and emotionally sick people into healthy ones overnight. It can set up a shining goal on the positive side, after all it is only a temporary ego-reducer."

> But Wilson added: "The vision and insights given by LSD could create a large incentive – at least in a considerable number of people."

> His words were found in a late 50s letter to Father Ed Dowling, a Catholic priest and member of an experimental group he had formed in New York to explore the spiritual potential of LSD.

ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7•3h ago
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/psymed.2023.0044
patrickmay•3h ago
When clergy take psilocybin . . . God sees them?
867-5309•3h ago
when you eat too many shrooms .. the shrooms eat back at you
867-5309•3h ago
I vaguely remember some televised British experiment in which a clergyman replaced his usual bread with poppy seed bread -- toast for breakfast, sandwich for lunch, etc. -- then at the end of a month or so tested positive for some opioid threshhold
cnasc•2h ago
From Brainiac: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9At-dgp0rQ
nathan_compton•3h ago
I don't know if my brain is just wired up differently, but I've taken both LSD and Psilocybin many times and I did not find the experiences spiritual at all. I don't even know what people are talking about when they talk about spiritual experiences.
esseph•3h ago
I know people personally that psilocybin, LSD, and other substances do nothing for. All of them also have existing mental health disorders (extreme generalized anxiety, depression, bipolar, etc.).
kbenson•2h ago
Nothing as in there is no outside noticeable change in behavior and they report no change in speaking, or nothing as it relates to the topic of this thread, in that they have no profound or spiritual experiences?
esseph•2h ago
They might get a slight body high even on what would otherwise be considered heroic doses for their weight.

Things like lemon-tek to make the psilocybin more bioavailable were also not impactful to them, while being apparently extremely impactful for others.

vermilingua•2h ago
It may be worth noting that antidepressant medication has a strong suppressing effect on psychedelics.
ghxst•1h ago
Depends on the type! Generally might be true for SSRIs but not always for TCAs or lithium which can have the opposite effect. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8788508/ (just one example)
jdenning•2h ago
Many psych meds diminish/block psychedelic effects.
t-3•3h ago
Agreed. I really enjoy both acid and shrooms, but beyond appreciating the fractal beauty of trees and the patterns in carpets a bit more I wouldn't describe them as anything life-changing, let alone some kind of spiritual awakening. MDMA is similarly hyped up, but no, I never felt "connected to the mass of humanity" or whatever people talk about, I just got high and danced while gritting my teeth and rubbing on my head.
crtified•1h ago
Decades ago I had the same type of what are people talking about?!, it's certainly not happening to me! surprise, regarding MDMA and the supposed wonders of dancing the night away. I felt the effects of the substance, but to me, nightclub dancing on MDMA still felt about as awkwardly-conscious, performative and unnecessary as it did without!

I suspect it's similar with the spiritual stuff, in principle. That is, if you're typically not a personality who tends towards that stuff - spiritual connections and revelations and such - then perhaps no substance will necessary make you so.

sev•3h ago
Dosage might play a factor, I presume.
denkmoon•3h ago
are you otherwise spiritual? I think that might be a prerequisite. Outside of spirituality did you have any experiences that were "profound" or "thought provoking"?
comrade1234•3h ago
Same. The hallucinations are fun and the laughter and joy but at the same time I can tell, even though I'm tripping, that it's just my brain mixing up its wiring and nothing to do with god.
konfusinomicon•1h ago
it is there. in a former life ive only felt it under the spell of either of those substances mixed with others popular with today's party goers, but it is. very fleeting and hard to describe but I have the sparse memories of the feelings during the experiences and once you get there you will know and definitely remember
DontchaKnowit•1h ago
Lsd did it for me. Psilocybin was not spiritual at all.

For me the "spiritual exlerience" was just a profound sense of gratefulness. And then the idea that god and objective truth are one and the same. Whatever that means

Projectiboga•2h ago
It was done at Harvard Divinity School in 1962

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_Chapel_Experiment

The Marsh Chapel Experiment, also called the "Good Friday Experiment", was an experiment conducted on Good Friday, April 20, 1962 at Boston University's Marsh Chapel. Walter N. Pahnke, a graduate student in theology at Harvard Divinity School, designed the experiment under the supervision of Timothy Leary, Richard Alpert, and the Harvard Psilocybin Project.[1] Pahnke's experiment investigated whether psilocybin would act as a reliable entheogen in religiously predisposed subjects.[2]

gchamonlive•1h ago
I go to raves, I take very modest amounts of LSD (100 maybe 150 micrograms), and the whole experience turns into very spiritual session where I dance with my entire being and let myself disolve into the Great Void.

It has lasting effects that go way beyond the effects of the drug.

However I think it's complicated to derive generalisms like saying it's a drug for everyone and everybody should take it. It's definitely not for everybody.

I'm also not going to be a hypocrite and say that you shouldn't do it. What I'll go and say is that it's your journey to figure out what you are going to invite into your life. In any case, depending on what you believe, you aren't actually here to figure things out. You already did. You are here to remember.

In more secular terms, you are here to do the required work to understand yourself, your circumstances, stand on the shoulder of giants and study the great minds that came before you. That will give you the necessary foundational philosophy to withstand and understand these experiences, should you choose to go through them. This is the only way to acquire a foundational respect for these substances and these experiences.

Have I done this work? Have I achieved the required level of understanding to make heads and tails of these experiences? Not for a while at least. It was rough the first couple of times. Very violent and crude, like rushing naked through a sea of people while being completely sure that that night is the last night of your life (I wasn't actually naked, it just felt like that and that everyone was eventually going to merge with me and that I should feel ashamed of it).

But with time and with the necessary exposure to understand the basics of existencialism I think I managed to pin down a more gentle form of this experience that can help me remember how to lay myself bare to the goddess and just be there when I dance.

So I think I can extend this invitation to anyone that feels brave enough to lift the reins of existence and reality and expose yourself to the truth. That everything is a story about the end of the world. About the beginning. And about everything at once.

It's scary, it's blissful and it's totally worth it.

thinkingtoilet•1h ago
I would go as far as to say most people should have a psychedelic experience at least once in their life. There's nothing like it. It's one of the great pleasures of being alive.
gchamonlive•46m ago
Totally. It's just that that realisation must come from within, because the experience changes the very perception of reality and the relationship between yourself and everything else. With the wrong circumstances what would otherwise be a blissful experience can turn into a nightmare and this gate is likely forever closed for this person. I'd never forgive myself if I had this happen to someone else because of ill advice given by me.
SlowTao•8m ago
Some of the best writing on the uses of LSD come from Alan watts. In his early life he said "it was impossible to bottle mysticism" and yet on dropping acid the first time felt like "they have completely bottled mysticism!".

But then he noticed that the results really depend on who is taking it and what their world view is. If you do not have any inclination towards that mystic space, you will not get the ego death. It is as Eckhart Tolle said "just your senses turned up to 11", that is if there is nothing else you can get out of it.

As Douglas Rushkoff said "If you give tech bros a hit of psychedelics, all you get is tech bros on psychedelics." There is no higher sense achieved.

kazinator•1h ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_of_the_people

What are the odds that peddlers of religion would turn to promoting chemical drugs on the side ...

cluckindan•1h ago
There’s that word again: ”drugs” - you just know anyone using that word in earnest is suffering from a narrow and naïve world view imposed upon them by generations of propaganda.

There is a huge experiential chasm between opiates and psychedelics. These two groups of substances have nothing to do with each other.

kazinator•12m ago
[delayed]
motohagiography•1h ago
if you are interested in a rabbit hole, look up the appearance of the acacia shrub in the bible, a source of DMT, and how some people associate it with the burning bush. quite a trip.

I've said before that I think the geometric patterns in hallucinations resemble analog signal feedback, inside an analog signalling system (your brain) that has been impaired by a chemical. other dimensions and beings aren't necessary to the explanation. there are theraputic uses for breaking cycles of thought, but I'd argue a non-spiritual view of drugs based on signalling feedback and channel impairment is sufficient to describe their effects.

guicen•1h ago
What I find interesting is that the line between a religious experience and a brain chemistry event seems a lot thinner than we usually think. The clergy didn’t lose their faith after taking psilocybin. Instead, they seem to hold their beliefs a bit more loosely and focus more on what they feel in the moment. In some ways, this feels like something humans have always done. Whether it's prayer, meditation, fasting, or psychedelics, people keep looking for ways to quiet the noise in their heads and feel connected to something bigger. The methods change, but the need stays the same.
leptons•38m ago
>the line between a religious experience and a brain chemistry event seems a lot thinner than we usually think.

George Gurdjieff wrote about this many, many years ago (1890 – 1912). He called it "The Fourth Way". This is the relevant passage from the book "In Search of the Miraculous":

“So that when a man attains will on the fourth way he can make use of it because he has acquired control of all his bodily, emotional, and intellectual functions. And besides, he has saved a great deal of time by working on the three sides of his being in parallel and simultaneously.

“The fourth way is sometimes called the way of the sly man. The ‘sly man’ knows some secret winch the fakir, monk, and yogi do not know. How the ‘sly man’ learned this secret — it is not known. Perhaps he found it in some old books, perhaps he inherited it, perhaps he bought it, perhaps he stole it from someone. It makes no difference. ‘The ‘sly man’ knows the secret and with its help outstrips the fakir, the monk, and the yogi.

“Of the four, the fakir acts in the crudest manner; he knows very little and understands very little. Let us suppose that by a whole month of intense torture he develops in himself a certain energy, a certain substance which produces certain changes in him. He does it absolutely blindly, with his eyes shut, knowing neither aim, methods, nor results, simply in imitation of others.

“The monk knows what he wants a little better; he is guided by religious feeling, by religious tradition, by a desire for achievement, for salvation; he trusts his teacher who tells him what to do, and he believes that his efforts and sacrifices are ‘pleasing to God.’ Let us suppose that a week of fasting, continual prayer, privations, and so on, enables him to attain what the fakir develops in himself by a month of self-torture.

“The yogi knows considerably more. He knows what he wants, he knows why he wants it, he knows how it can be acquired. He knows, for instance, that it is necessary for his purpose to produce a certain substance in himself. He knows that this substance can be produced in one day by a certain kind of mental exercises or concentration of consciousness. So he keeps his attention on these exercises for a whole day without allowing himself a single outside thought, and he obtains what he needs. In this way a yogi spends on the same thing only one day compared with a month spent by the fakir and a week spent by the monk.

“But on the fourth way knowledge is still more exact and perfect. A man who follows the fourth way knows quite definitely what substances he needs for his aims and he knows that these substances can be produced within the body by a month of physical suffering, by a week of emotional strain, or by a day of mental exercises—and also, that they can be introduced into the organism from without if it is known how to do it. And so, instead of spending a whole day in exercises like the yogi, a week in prayer like the monk, or a month in self-torture like the fakir, he simply prepares and swallows a little pill which contains all the substances he wants and, in this way, without loss of time, he obtains the required results.

https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.5892/page/49/mode/2up

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Way

testemailfordg2•48m ago
Better to stay sane...Have seen a lot of these kinds of articles, surely funding comes from somewhere...
50208•46m ago
Why do people insist on complicating all this so much ... just take a hit of whatever and experience it for yourself.
summer_glue•27m ago
There's not much information in this article.
SlowTao•12m ago
Ram Dass said that back in the 1960's when they were doing study of LSD they would try to randomize/double blind these tests but it was very funny to see. There were one where they had clergy involved and it basically went, one person would be like "I think it is doing something" and another would be wandering around going "I SEE GOD! I SEE GOD!". It was obvious who had what.