There is a nice illustration of a 2-sphere wrapped twice around another 2-sphere on the Wikipedia article for the homotopy groups of spheres [0].

Now, there are many ways of proving that there is only one way (up to homotopy) of wrapping a 2-sphere n times around another 2-sphere, but all of them are fairly involved. The simplest proof comes from an analysis of the Hopf fibration, which roughly describes a relation between the 1-sphere, the 2-sphere and the 3-sphere [1]. Other than this, it follows from the theory of degrees for continuous mappings, or from the Freudenthal suspension theorem and some basic homological computations.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homotopy_groups_of_spheres#/me...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopf_fibration

This answer is probably a bit convoluted and possible erroneous. Assume the Earth has radius 2. Use coordinates (t,z) to denote “longitude” and “latitude from the North pole”. Thus (0,0) is the North Pole, (0, pi/2) is the Greenwich equatorial point and (0, pi) is the South pole.

You can have “two” spheres wrapped within the Earth with the following parametrization. Using a first coordinate r to denote the distance to the Earth’s center, so that (1,t,z) denotes the points in the sphere of radius 1:

(a,b)-> (1+cos(b)/2, a,b), for a,b in the interval [0,2pi].

Those are not proper spheres (the radius changes) but the surface so parametrized is homotopic to a sphere “counted two times”.

It is not possible to have a warped sphere which does not cross itself, as far as I can tell (but I might be wrong).

The wikipedia image linked by a sibling comment did not help me…

ETA: the issue is not the dimension (2) of your spheres but the codimension (1) inside the object, and the fact that you have only removed the center of the main sphere. I think (caveat emptor) that if you remove 2 points form the solid sphere, you get Z^2. Similar to the case of surfaces and holes.

this great visualisation of homotopy groups might be helpful

A Sphere is a Loop of Loops (Visualizing Homotopy Groups)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=CxGtAuJdjYI

It's a good (and long) interview, and I genuinely enjoyed it. Terry Tao comes across as a truly nice person. However, I noticed that he tends to be somewhat non-committal in his responses. For each question posed, he provides thorough explanations that most with a basic understanding of math can follow. Nevertheless, he rarely makes predictions or offers his opinion. He frequently ends with a remark such as, "Yes, well, it's a challenging problem."

I completely understand where he is coming from. While it's true that "we don't know what we don't know", I would appreciate hearing more about his (opinionated) thoughts regarding the topics discussed during the interview.