frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Show HN: Frost AI – Monetize your AI agents with a few lines of code

https://www.frostai.dev/
1•florentmsl•1m ago•0 comments

Enter the Arena: Simplifying Memory Management (2023) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ5a3gCCZYo
1•ibobev•1m ago•0 comments

Scientists Discover New Species of Pterosaur in Japan

https://scitechdaily.com/first-of-its-kind-scientists-discover-new-species-of-pterosaur-in-japan/
1•Brajeshwar•2m ago•0 comments

Forget SuperIntelligence – we need to tackle 'stupid' AI first

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26635482-700-forget-superintelligence-we-need-to-tackle-stupid-ai-first/
2•Brajeshwar•2m ago•0 comments

Sleep Has No Magic Number

https://nautil.us/sleep-has-no-magic-number-1218435/
1•Brajeshwar•2m ago•0 comments

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Foundations and Modern Approaches

https://www.marl-book.com/
1•lnyan•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Build production-ready LangGraph AI agents with natural language

https://github.com/braid-ink/braid
1•digitcatphd•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I'm building an app to replace Overleaf and Notion

1•WolfOliver•3m ago•0 comments

Removal of unwanted drivers from Windows Update

https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/hardwaredevcenter/removal-of-unwanted-drivers-from-windows-update/4425647
1•zdw•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Nxtscape – an open-source agentic browser

https://github.com/nxtscape/nxtscape
4•felarof•6m ago•0 comments

Cracovians: The Twisted Twins of Matrices

https://marcinciura.wordpress.com/2025/06/20/cracovians-the-twisted-twins-of-matrices/
4•mci•6m ago•0 comments

Hey aliens, here's our new album. How to follow up a record hurtling in space?

https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/jun/20/aliens-new-album-golden-record-space-voyager-chuck-berry
1•markx2•9m ago•0 comments

16 billion logins discovered across exposed datasets, but don't panic

https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/06/18/16-billion-logins-discovered-across-exposed-datasets-but-dont-panic
1•TZubiri•10m ago•1 comments

Who cares about developer productivity anyway?

https://keystonebit.com/posts/developer-productivity
3•gatinsama•13m ago•0 comments

Russian Hackers Bypass Gmail MFA with App-Specific Password Ruse

https://www.securityweek.com/russian-hackers-bypass-gmail-mfa-with-app-specific-password-ruse/
2•Bender•16m ago•0 comments

Godfather Android Trojan Creates Sandbox on Infected Devices

https://www.securityweek.com/godfather-android-trojan-creates-sandbox-on-infected-devices/
1•Bender•17m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I Built a Rust Docs MCP Server for Agents

https://github.com/snowmead/rust-docs-mcp
1•snowmead•17m ago•0 comments

FreeType Zero-Day Found by Meta Exploited in Paragon Spyware Attacks

https://www.securityweek.com/freetype-zero-day-found-by-meta-exploited-in-paragon-spyware-attacks/
1•Bender•17m ago•0 comments

'catastrophic risk to humanity': New York is pushing back against AI

https://www.dazeddigital.com/life-culture/article/67027/1/catastrophic-risk-humanity-new-york-artificial-intelligence-raise-act-bill
3•Bluestein•21m ago•0 comments

JSFireTruck: Exploring Malicious JavaScript Using JSFuck Obfuscation Technique

https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/malicious-javascript-using-jsfiretruck-as-obfuscation/
1•dskrvk•22m ago•0 comments

Marijuana's Links to Heart Attack and Stroke Are Becoming Clearer

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/19/well/marijuana-heart-health-risks.html
1•mikhael•24m ago•0 comments

Assisted dying set to become law in England and Wales after bill passed by MPs

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/jun/20/assisted-dying-law-england-and-wales-bill-passed
1•tomduncalf•25m ago•0 comments

How to Hire a Back End Developer as an Executive

https://www.technology.org/2025/06/20/how-to-hire-a-backend-developer-as-an-executive/
1•Aninay•25m ago•1 comments

Show HN: An SDK for building custom coding agents with tools and sub-agents

1•chw9e•29m ago•0 comments

Godfather of AI has a new plan to keep us safe from it

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/417087/ai-safety-yoshua-bengio-lawzero
2•tux1968•30m ago•0 comments

A continental scale analysis reveals widespread root bimodality

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-60055-2
4•Bluestein•32m ago•0 comments

Gulaschprogrammiernacht 23

https://media.ccc.de/c/gpn23
1•todsacerdoti•33m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pickaxe – a TypeScript library for building AI agents

https://github.com/hatchet-dev/pickaxe
2•abelanger•34m ago•3 comments

Show HN: Lin – CLI tool that uses LLMs to automate/manage internationalization

https://github.com/yuo-app/lin
1•Rettend•34m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What do you think about app native vs. portable look-and-feel?

2•ttd•35m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Meta announces Oakley smart glasses

https://www.theverge.com/news/690133/meta-oakley-hstn-ai-glasses-price-date
74•jmsflknr•3h ago
Official announcement: https://www.meta.com/en-gb/blog/oakley-meta-ai-glasses-sport...

Comments

garbawarb•2h ago
Looks cool but I just hate the heaviness and feel of wearing acetate. If they ever make titanium smartglasses I'll be all over them.
kube-system•2h ago
Titanium is about 3-4x the density, they're normally light only because less material can be used... which is probably problematic when used as an enclosure for electronics.
syntaxing•2h ago
Titanium for electronics isn’t much of a problem (look at Apple Watch and a bunch of Apple product). The issue is that it’s a considerably more expensive material (every cents count when you scale to consumer electronics) and a bit harder to work with.
woleium•2h ago
The material is not the majority of the expense. The cost comes from the difficulty encountered when working the metal using standard tooling. It is difficult to work, low tolerance and high failure rates made it impractical prior to modern (very expensive) machines.
kube-system•2h ago
We were talking about weight -- you don't hang those devices on your face.

Titanium glasses are lightweight because a very minimal amount of material is used. This is possible for regular glasses because you can make them with a ~1mm cross-section. When you want to put electronics inside of them, you need much more material.

diggan•1h ago
Although parent asking for titanium for the feeling, so maybe something in-between would be fine? Lightweight material inside and structurally, but titanium or something else as the "skin".
isatty•1h ago
Why? If 1mm cross section titanium is just as or stronger why does it need to be thicker? For anchors?
kube-system•1h ago
Because the electronics used in smart glasses go inside of the frames. It's not a structural problem, it's a packaging problem.
LtdJorge•1h ago
Does sheet titanium not exist? I know it’s a tough metal, I don’t know if it would be feasible to make it out of folded sheet titanium.

Edit: Just checked, it does exist.

kube-system•40m ago
The weight is the issue. The guy above said he doesn't like the weight of acetate glasses. Acetate frames for traditional glasses are 10-20 grams. Titanium frames for traditional glasses are 5-10 grams.

Between the weight of material and the electronics, I don't really see anything approaching the feel that someone that discerning would want.

LtdJorge•1h ago
Even if it’s an order of magnitude more expensive, they would make money on the glasses. Oakley (and every brand controlled by the Luxotica monopoly) glasses have extreme margins. On the order of, could be sold for under $20 making a profit but are sold for $300+. I don’t think the titanium work and the electronics can offset that.
LorenDB•2h ago
Come on, why would you make smart glasses with a clear shell and then hide the electronics behind an inner shielding layer? I want all the circuits on display.
sodokuwizard•2h ago
ah yes to satisfy that world famous market of giga electronics nerds in oakleys
longtimelistnr•2h ago
Well i know this is sarcastic but have you seen the preferred design language of the Oakley founder? Exposed circuitry is righttt up his alley.
luxuryballs•2h ago
it sounds like he got in trouble for exposing his circuitry in public
duped•1h ago
Light can affect the operation of many electronics, it's just easier to not worry about it and enclose the entire thing. Some models of RPI had this problem.
sleepyguy•2h ago
My elderly mother-in-law is slowly going blind. She relies on Meta glasses to read print on everything — from the back of a can to the mail. She also uses them to help locate items around the house, whether it’s something on the counter or in the living room.

I’ve tried the glasses myself, and I’m convinced that wearable eyewear like this will eventually replace the mobile phone. With ongoing advances in miniaturization, it’s only a matter of time before AR and AV are fully integrated into everyday wearables.

gwbas1c•1h ago
> and I’m convinced that wearable eyewear like this will eventually replace the mobile phone

Once there is an actual usable in-glasses screen, I will agree.

A few years ago I tried someone's smartglasses with a screen. It basically had similar functionality to my first Fitbit: it would show texts, notifications, caller ID.

I really want one of those and went looking, but couldn't find it.

ge96•25m ago
What style was it, nreal (bulky) or something like Frame (though lower end in quality)
themanmaran•9m ago
You might be interested in the EvenRealities G1 [1]. It's the absolute best form factor I've seen for just the text HUD

https://www.evenrealities.com/

ian-g•1h ago
I’m very glad your mother in law has use for them.

With that said, I don’t think these can replace phones until they’re quite a lot smaller and lighter. And to make it worse, you’d need at least two pairs - regular and sun. Possibly three if you’re someone who regularly uses safety glasses.

nhecker•57m ago
Photochromatic coatings -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochromic_lens -- have existed for a while and are sold on safety glasses, at least according to a cursory look at a large online retailer's site.

That said, I'm not sure I'd want smart glasses. Being stuck on a computer for work, I try to take some time every day to be completely free of digital things. It's hard enough to do that with a smart phone in my pocket vying for my attention. I imagine it would be only harder with smart glasses over my eyeballs.

foobarian•25m ago
They may not replace the current gamut of phone features. However; I question how much of current phone functionality is actually something users strongly need/want, vs. how much is pushed by big tech. It would be pretty great if a small core feature set done well in-glass turned out to be enough to kick off large scale adoption. Ultimately I think the input is probably going to be the hardest issue
ge96•24m ago
What would be the interface, talking? I know they have pinching and hand tracking, guess it's no different than people talking "to themselves" while wearing earbuds.
criddell•21m ago
I don't think I would be super comfortable walking around with Meta cameras seeing everything I see in my home. I'm not sure I'd trust any of the companies likely to build the product with that kind of access to my personal life.
SoftTalker•1h ago
I don't think so. You still would have to wear glasses, which is annoying.
cshimmin•1h ago
some of us have to wear glasses anyway :/
dmarcos•55m ago
And contact lenses and lasik are popular because many don’t want to wear glasses. I see head mounted displays useful in constrained scenarios (e.g construction site and tasks where you already wear safety glasses and need free hands). I have a harder time seeing a world where people ditch phones and start voluntarily wearing glasses which is often uncomfortable and inconvenient. Just finished 5 miles run on treadmill, went to sauna and did bouldering. There’s no room for glasses but can occasionally check my phone.
mollerhoj•37m ago
i dont think youre very representative of the general population
eloisant•55m ago
Then they'll have to find a way to separate the "smart" frame from the prescription lenses, so you can change the glasses when your sight changes without having to buy smart frame each time - or the other way around, upgrade your frames without having to buy prescriptions lenses again.
sleepyguy•44m ago
Lensology, you tell them the frames, and upload your prescription, and they send you the lenses to pop in. It's called reglazing, and millions of people do it all the time.

Ray Ban does it for their Meta glasses, but Lensology can handle stronger prescription lenses.

barbazoo•21m ago
Anecdotally, I haven't found it possible to buy lenses for a particular frame other than when you buy both new at the same time. Good luck getting the same lenses next time the prescription changes.

The frame will probably change slightly over time to make them incompatible.

kcb•13m ago
Very confused by this. As far as I know it's standard for lenses to be custom made for your frame even when you purchase them at the same time.

I just sent an old pair of glasses to eyeglasses.com for new lenses. I never considered this to be a big deal.

zie•4m ago
> The frame will probably change slightly over time to make them incompatible.

This is probably true.

The rest of your comment is probably not true for most people.

It just depends on how strong your prescription is and how willing the shop/website is to do special orders.

If you are almost blind, then your choice of lenses/frames will be much lower than if you are only slightly blind(most people). Any reputable eyeglass/optician shop should be able to make custom lenses for pretty much any frame. They can't always do the super sleek shades that some people like to wear.

lokar•18m ago
I often get updated lenses for my frames. Is that not what you mean?
xnorswap•10m ago
Maybe we'll work out how to stimulate the optic nerve directly and skip to bionic eyes for both corrective vision and AR.

We'll need to overhaul the concept of limited liability before we do that though, the thought of someone being left without their eyes because a company goes bankrupt and no-one is at fault is pretty horrifying.

SoftTalker•9m ago
Yes, and I am one of "us" but I still think they are annoying. I wear contacts most of the time. Glasses are just awkward in many situations. In the heat when you get sweaty they slide down your nose or completely fall off, in the cold when you walk in to a warm house they fog over, in the rain they get water spots, they interfere with peripheral vision. I just don't care much for them.
pizzathyme•18m ago
I agree. Some threshold in the past few years has been passed. I wear mine every day (and I don't wear glasses normally). Music, photos, videos all super useful. AI is lacking but will get better. Feels cool and not-embarassing in public

I think that they've done it, this is Meta's iPod

dustbunny•13m ago
I'm interested in hearing more use cases! Anyone else got one?
Janicc•7m ago
I believe it's going to replace smartphones like smartphones replaced computers or more specifically laptops.
luxuryballs•2h ago
I was looking at the Ray-Ban version of these for a few minutes before I realized there’s no HUD… I wouldn’t even consider a dev kit for one of these unless I had some kind of ability to add a dragon ball scouter widget to show the power level on the lens…
excalibur•1h ago
If that's what you want, you can find some pretty good deals on Google Glass on ebay.
amazingamazing•1h ago
won't buy these, or any others smart glasses until there's a way to replace the battery. I'm annoy'd enough that it's difficult to do with bluetooth headphones... with my quest 3 at least there's an option to plug it into an external battery, given the traditional use cases.
Workaccount2•1h ago
A side note, but it is very unfortunate luck that the pendulum of fashionable eye-wear has swung back towards 80's/90's style thin frame/no frame glasses.

You really need young people to carry tech like this, and needing them to wear millennial fashion from 10 years ago so camera and compute fit will just make it that much harder.

paxys•1h ago
Why did Zuck think it was okay to post a photo of himself wearing them? Does he think his cool looks will drive sales? The little interest I had immediately disappeared after seeing it.
some_random•1h ago
Do you typically make your tech choices based on who they have modeling them in ads?
Apocryphon•1h ago
Well, when they’re wearables…
542354234235•1h ago
The entire history of advertising would indicate that a lot of people do make choices, especially fashion related, based on being modeled by beautiful famous people with established parasocial relationships with their audience.
spiderice•35m ago
Whether or not we want to admit it, people definitely make tech choices based off how cool the people in the ads look. To deny that would be to deny the effectiveness of marketing.
foxygen•1h ago
What is wrong with it?
mkoryak•1h ago
hes trying to show off his 100k watch
tomhow•1h ago
Stub for oftopicness
demosthanos•2h ago
Somehow we've actually managed to regress from 2013's Google Glass.

Always-on microphone and camera sold by one of the world's sketchiest privacy invaders? Check.

Display that actually takes advantage of the glasses form factor? Nope. Sounds like this could just as easily be the Humane pin.

Handy-Man•2h ago
It's not always on. How do you skeptics always manage to get things wrong to get your point across?
demosthanos•2h ago
If you can ask "Hey Meta, ..." while holding a golf club and unable to touch a button (which the promo video [0] shows you can) then the mic is always on. It may not always be beaming data to Meta, but that's a matter of trust, which I don't have much of for Meta given their history.

The camera may or may not be always on, but it can be turned on by software activated by the always-on mic (again, demonstrated by the promo video), so it would be best to treat it as though it is.

[0] https://about.fb.com/news/2025/06/introducing-oakley-meta-gl...

elondaits•34m ago
The “Hey *” (Meta, Siri, Alexa) is typically handled by a simpler mechanism on a short buffer that triggers the proper recording and speech recognition workflow in order to save battery. But if you’re not going to trust the company, then the fact that it responds to Hey Meta shouldn’t make any difference because it could still be quietly recording. The fact that it responds to a wakeup prompt changes nothing.
demosthanos•28m ago
I'm aware of the mechanism, but that mechanism relies on a mic that is always on.

I agree that the primary issue is that it's a software-controlled microphone with no off switch controlled by software written by Meta. I only emphasized the wake word listening in response to OP's claim that it's not always on when it must be.

meepmorp•1h ago
how can it respond to voice prompts if it's not listening?
echoangle•1h ago
The claim was always-on mic and camera. The mic might be always on, the camera doesn’t have to.
demosthanos•1h ago
I responded to that above. If the mic is always on and controls the camera (both of which are demonstrated in the promo video), any reasonable approach to infosec needs to treat the camera as always on as well.
echoangle•1h ago
Maybe, but that doesn’t mean that the camera is always on. It’s like saying a person holding an empty gun and a magazine is holding a loaded weapon because they can quickly reload it. It doesn’t really change the effect but it’s still an error.
demosthanos•1h ago
Whether an empty gun and a magazine counts as a loaded gun varies state-by-state, so the distinction is not as clear-cut as you make it sound. New York State penal code defines a loaded gun as follows:

> 15. "Loaded firearm" means any firearm loaded with ammunition or any firearm which is possessed by one who, at the same time, possesses a quantity of ammunition which may be used to discharge such firearm.

So I guess I'm using the New York definition of an always-on camera.

https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/265.00

toofy•1h ago
and you trust meta with this? i don’t mean to be crass but that would be crazy.

they have proven over and over and over and over again they are absolutely not trustworthy.

at some point we have to come to grips with the fact that people like zuck, elon, andreeson, and other tech monarchs are openly hostile and despise us when we ask for anything remotely resembling transparency for their companies but repeatedly abuse us and openly scoff at our privacy.

the fact that we collectively don’t understand the repercussions of this really is a bad sign.

i very well may have misunderstood your meaning, tho. i hope so.

awongh•1h ago
Crazy how much more acceptable this is only 12 years later.

People were so angry in 2013.

toast0•1h ago
Google glass was a display that was up and to the right of where you want to be looking.

I don't know about everyone, but I found it pretty hard to use. Caveat, I didn't get them fit to me, I was supervising an intern working on a speculative Glass project, and they were fit to him.

AR would be neat, but voice interfaces are acheivable at an approachable cost. I'm not one to talk to a computer, and I wear prescription lenses, so these glasses don't appeal to me, but I can see there's a market there, not sure how big or if Meta can capture it.

demosthanos•1h ago
Right, I'm not claiming Glass was good, but it at least attempted to use the glasses form factor for something.
toast0•16m ago
The camera to capture 'what you see' seems like using the form factor pretty well.

Mic and speakers, too.

Glass attempted a display, but IMHO, it was unusable, so I understand why you would try the same thing with no display. Or the same thing, but mounted on your wrist (Google Wear).

kotaKat•1h ago
It's one of those times you just want to "OK Glass" the person around you that says "Hey, Meta" with their privacy-invading cameras.
georgeecollins•1h ago
Well it shows you what was the real problem with glass, it looked dorky. I wish people cared about privacy but in general they don't.
xnx•2h ago
Official source: https://about.fb.com/news/2025/06/introducing-oakley-meta-gl...

Not sure why theverge gets linked so much here.

diggan•1h ago
Usually I prefer second-hand sources over press-releases, as press-releses tend to be a bit too much navel-gazing and pats on the back.
add-sub-mul-div•1h ago
Right, journalism adds commentary and context. People may often think it's bad, or not like or agree with what they read, and conflate that with thinking journalism is bad or forgetting what it fundamentally is and why it's important that it exists. A straight up ad from Facebook would not be better than this.
demosthanos•1h ago
In general I agree, but The Verge in particular tends to just say exactly what the press release says with less detail. If we're going to do a non-press-release source it should be because they're offering context and information that the company would not willingly choose to provide themselves.
diggan•1h ago
Yeah, also agree with you in general, if it's the same, doesn't really matter :)

But at least the last paragraph seems to be adding something, although the rest of the article is indeed just a re-hash of the press-release.

> Meta recently signed a multi-year deal with EssilorLuxottica, the parent company behind Ray-Ban, Oakley, and other eyewear brands. The Meta Ray-Bans have sold over two million pairs to date, and EssilorLuxottica recently disclosed that it plans to sell 10 million smart glasses with Meta annually by 2026. “This is our first step into the performance category,” Alex Himel, Meta’s head of wearables, tells me. “There’s more to come.”

DHPersonal•2h ago
The difference between the stylish product shot and the goofy candid is stunning. The glasses look ridiculous on Zuckerberg.
jebarker•2h ago
Ridiculous seems strong. They’re not my style but I see people making far more surprising fashion choices everyday
badlucklottery•2h ago
I think part of the issue is that Zuckerberg is a smaller dude and they're pretty big sunglasses so he has a bit of that "Look! I'm wearing dad's glasses!" thing going on.
gardenhedge•1h ago
So that's half of men and most women ruled out?
ChrisMarshallNY•1h ago
Big glasses are actually quite popular with women.

Heavy frames and large lenses tend to compensate for larger noses, and other facial issues (although they won't come out and say that). Clear glasses can really focus on the eyes.

I know a couple of women that have made large, heavy-rimmed glasses into a real fashion statement.

newsclues•1h ago
Oakley quality tanked since luxottica bought them.

Unfortunate.

deafpolygon•1h ago
Whaaaat the heck is going on in the reflections on Mark Z’s glasses?
foxygen•1h ago
His wife holding a phone?
make3•1h ago
I don't think we should normalize pointing cameras at people's faces all the time. I hate these things.
dynm•14m ago
Maybe they have some light to show if they're on. But is everyone supposed to just know that? Pointing a video camera at everyone you talk to is an... interesting social choice. Glasses like these should be designed with a physical mechanisms to cover the cameras.
wiether•53m ago
So how do you prevent Meta from gathering secrets displayed for even a tenth of a second on an employee' screen? You'll have to ask security to check everyone's glasses now?
wwweston•39m ago
Meta isn’t the last company I’d trust with a wearable always on video input (among other data no doubt), but they’re in the bracket.
Bender•44m ago
This is just my opinion but these look even worse that the 1940's+ military issued BC glasses. BC as in birth control. [1] At least it will be easy to spot the glassholes [2] for now at least.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GI_glasses

[2] - https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=glassholes

OkGoDoIt•32m ago
Still no SDK though, what’s the point of smart glasses that only do what Meta lets them?

I’m personally more excited about the Mentra Live glasses, which are fully programmable with AugmentOS.

dkobia•27m ago
This. The meta glasses have so much potential and it is absolutely frustrating as a developer to have no way to make use of it.
divan•29m ago
Weird take: my biggest annoyance with Meta glasses after 1+ year of almost daily usage is that there is no way to switch from Meta AI to any other voice AI.
kaycebasques•19m ago
So there's no AR aspect to the lens on any of these Meta-partnered smart sunglasses, right? I assumed that was standard on all of them. Naive, I know, because that would require some amazing hardware. But it does go to show that we're still far from the Star Trek future that other simpleton consumers like myself might be hoping for / expecting.
dustbunny•16m ago
I was stoked when I saw these headlines cause I generally prefer Oakley to Ray Ban in terms of style, but these look nothing like Oakley's! Personally I don't like round glasses, I like more square glasses. Dang!
post_break•11m ago
Until they make it so you can replace the battery I'm not going to buy.
kgilpin•8m ago
I will miss being able to see people’s eyes.
Raed667•4m ago
Does it even matter if they have Oakley or any other logo on them? Aren't they all luxotica anyway?
toephu2•3m ago
No mention of weight in the article or on the official product page?