I'm curious how spam protection works if you're an alternative, few users, chat app? I hate Meta's monopoly as much as the next guy but one thing you do have to credit them for is the second to none spam protection. I also wonder how much requiring a cell number is part of that strategy.
chrisldgk•30m ago
I wouldn’t necessarily agree that WhatsApp‘s spam protection is that great.
I’ve been invited to quite a lot of pyramid scheme/scam WhatsApp groups, however that’s mostly happened after having to expose my private cell number on the internet (thanks to app stores and GDPR requiring some kind of phone number for businesses of any size).
Bluestein•10m ago
... always wondered if the cell phone requirement are not (also) tied to then wanting an actual, physical, person behind each account - as in most EU jurisdictions each SIM card is tied to an actual ID.-
v5v3•26m ago
An alternative few users chat app probably won't be a major target for spam untill it has lots of users.
So I would say it's a low priority feature in the backlog.
XorNot•18m ago
If your need is security then really that should be based on in person trust.
Or at least via a proxy.
So contact invitation can just be handled with use-once codes (or at least trivially burnable ones).
fouronnes3•38m ago
chrisldgk•30m ago
Bluestein•10m ago
v5v3•26m ago
So I would say it's a low priority feature in the backlog.
XorNot•18m ago
Or at least via a proxy.
So contact invitation can just be handled with use-once codes (or at least trivially burnable ones).