And yes I know that there are Cloudflare employees here so spare me with your pinky swears.
Lying about the scale of thwarted attacks by others is the counter argument
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/05/krebsonsecurity-hit-with...
While it may not impact your site, it does impact your hosting provider. As their costs go up, your costs go up. Anything on the Internet at this point needs DDoS / scraping protection. If may not drop your service, but your ISP or upstreams may blackhole your route.
The "old web" (current web) was largely based on an open exchange of information.
The "new web", post AI bot scraping, is taking its place. Websites are getting paywalls. Advertising revenue is plummeting. Hosting providers are getting decimated by the massive shift in bandwidth demand and impact to systems scraped by the bots.
Everyone hates when I set my app's fonts to courier size 8.
smokel•2h ago
How is that more complicated than a for-loop?
ukuina•2h ago
lolinder•48m ago
blitq•2h ago
monster_truck•1h ago
lolinder•51m ago
A well-engineered attack would not draw headlines for its scale because it would take down its target without breaking any records.
motorest•34m ago
You don't hear much about DDoS that are either comparable in size or bring down targets. How do you explain why this one made the news in spite of not having met your arbitrary and personal bar?
lolinder•26m ago
> in spite of not having met your arbitrary and personal bar?
I'm not sure what you mean by this. I didn't establish any sort of bar for what sorts of DDoS should get headlines, I'm just agreeing with OP that that line in the article doesn't make any sense. There may be other reasons to believe this attack was well-engineered but the article doesn't get into them.
rob_c•12m ago
It's that a serious question or bait?
Either way, are you so broken as to not understand what was just typed?