Let's face it, it's easy to ignore this stuff if it happens quietly. Tesla would probably have been fine if Musk had quietly financed Musk. He's being too public and blatant about it. Most consumers don't actually care that much until you rub their faces in it. Which Musk does.
It would absolutely be better if consumers were more aware of the hidden atrocities behind the products they buy. I try to avoid Chinese products, don't buy from Amazon, I've got a Fairphone, am picky about where my chocolate comes from, and avoid Chiquita, Nestle and brands like that. But I'm a tiny minority. We do need more awareness about this sort of thing.
But even with all the awareness that Musk is creating about his own fascism, there are still people buying his cars.
Otherwise it is difficult to see how they could still succeed, even if they ever manage to produce a perfect FSD.
He brought this on himself.
He should apologise,stay quiet, not get involved in politics or try to influence elections in Europe by supporting far right or other extreme parties.
Even if he steps away completely, the brand is still damaged and the competition is catching up pretty fast.
And that's not even considering how a change of heart would probably hurt his government connections and other funding sources in the near future.
His best chance is possibly to stay on course but tone it down, and generate some (at least perceived) successes with his companies. If he can stay in the game for another couple of years, I'd bet consumers will have mostly forgotten and focus on the products they're getting. I'm not exactly a fan of the CEOs of most companies I'm a customer of. Musk managed to be too much for many, but I don't think that'll stick for very long.
They took something that was quite tidily styled and classy (IMHO) looking, and have made it into this weird horizontal slit thing that looks cheap and nasty, and feels at odds with the rest of the car's shape and massing. A real mess of a facelift I think - no one would willing pick that if they cared about what it looks like.
Most importantly, it differentiates the model y from the model 3. Before the facelift the y sort of looked like a bloated model 3 with the exact same design language.
I dislike the new look of the Model 3, though, which looked kind of cute and from the front somewhat like a Porsche and now looks sort of aggressive with the thin lights.
regardless - you do realize tesla isn't about the looks, but user convenience? No car comes close it's integration.
It's funny they say climate change is a critical emergency (with several countries making measures to effectively ban AC), but then stick to stuff like that.
Yet here we are, with no end in sight for them, while I have to feel guilty to prefer something that doesn't destroy itself after a few seconds in contact with liquids, or to take the car, because transport network only favours those that already live in the city.
Energy usage doesn't have to correspond to environmental damage much at all.
This degrowth mindset is the whole problem with the EU. They focus on scarcity and cutbacks and regulation and bans, rather than addressing the underlying issues to spur on growth and innovation.
It is like loving the planet eating soja, while ignoring the forests being destroyed to satisfy demand as planting fields.
Or farmable fields now being solar panel fields, because it is more profitable to sell energy, than living the farmer life, earning pennies for a hard work life, while kids die every day of lack of nutrition.
To fix the planet, first we need to get rid of profit driven societies.
Edit: fully agree with the sentiment, getting rid of the profit-driven mindset would be beneficial to all.
Similar to the can ring holders that got banned previously for similar reasons.
It's telling that critics of the move needs to invent other reasons for it to fail at.
The percentage has been falling but it was still about a quarter of imported Chinese made EVs being Tesla in 2023. And a chunk more is European brands like Dacia and BMW.
Projected to be majority Chinese brands from this year though.
If it's about function or form then I think the new Teslas are getting uglier with light bars and busy styling vs the old clean and minimal look.
I think it's the Nazi salute where he really fucked up. Because even people that don't read (aka: most people) will look at an image of a Nazi salute and instantly have a strong opinion.
As long as JinPing doesn't do a Nazi salute, most people won't care much about what the Chinese government is doing.
The lesson of the story: Don't do controversial things in a way that makes a good cover page image.
I like my Model 3. It is a fantastic car. Charging infrastructure is bar none. Price is unbeatable. No range anxiety.
But of course, were I choosing a car to buy today, I would have never bought it. That would be akin to doing business with Epstein. Some things are absolutely unforgivable.
with BYD - they make cheaper cars, are more experienced in making batteries than tesla. so what advantage does tesla have over their rivals ?
yeah at first 'tech' people bought tesla's as a fashion statement but that period is over.
But that is banned in Europe atm, so it negates Tesla's main advantage.
Quarter-on-quarter or month-by-month would have been much more interesting, could have shown a change in trend. Especially after Musk's departure from the administration.
At this point it's much more interesting how well the Robotaxi is doing. It's still not driving like Waymo (I didn't like how it is desregarding the rules), but in a few years if it is able to scale up, it will scale much much faster and cheaper.
Volkswagen group EVs are pretty good, Volvo/Polestar EVs look really good, BYD is like Tesla but with Chinese backing and seem to be pulling ahead in battery tech, Hyundai/Kia produce batteries and control a ton of their supply chain being a conglomerate, etc... Tesla's battery tech is stale, their designs are stale (except the Cybertruck which is hideous), and all this is before considering the US/Elon Musk craziness...
Edit - should add, outside all the more innovative brands, every legacy brand has an EV as well.
Technologically behind the competition and more expensive too, but a strong brand name well known for being one of the first major electric car producers.
Now the brand is toxic BYD etc. will overtake them in Europe too. Ironically, it's Europe's own tariffs against China that have protected them from BYD for this long.
But Europe bans FSD, so in Europe, Tesla is just more expensive for no benefit.
Toyota's PE ratio, for a random comparison, is 6.5. It is unfair in many ways, but still, it shows the scale of the valuation gap!
I just don't understand the reason, why any Tesla shareholder wouldn't like the 400% return in 5 years, just because BYD had even better return and forced some margin compression on Tesla.
adlpz•4h ago
petesergeant•4h ago
quonn•4h ago
The software is a terrible mess for most brands and the charging infrastructure as well. Tesla's competition still costs about 25-50% more. It will take at least another 5 years or longer for someone to catch up.
tossandthrow•4h ago
Charging infrastructure really depends. In the northern country the alternatives are great and even Tesla owners would likely use alternative charging infrastructure - unless they want to take detours to get to Tesla charging points.
quonn•4h ago
gniv•4h ago
Edit: I meant to reply to u/petesergeant above.
quonn•3h ago
I have test-driven BYD, Volvo, VW and Tesla and extensively driving VW, Tesla and Volvo. Of course you see different brands, but it doesn't mean they are as good right now.
sundaeofshock•34m ago
mattlondon•3h ago
At least in the UK, I've never had a problem with charging stations of payment yet - there are lots of stations (some now are "plug and charge" so you just plug and the payment is dealt with automatically, but those are currently rare but the rest pretty much all take contactless payments) and many now that are 350KW (which is way more than either my ID3 or the Tesla 3 can handle). Pretty much everyone now has settled on CCS as the "usb for cars" in Europe so that are no cable/adaptor issues to worry about.
The software on the ID.3 is ok. If you sit there for 20 minutes and fiddle with it yes it is not as smooth as using a modern smart-phone in terms of responsiveness. But really, 99% of the time all I am doing with it is changing the radio station or aircon for which it is totally fine. I've not used a tesla so cannot do a direct comparison.
quonn•1h ago
I have an ID4 so I can compare both.
> I've not used a tesla so cannot do a direct comparison.
That's all I need to know.
ben_w•3h ago
You sure about that? From what I've seen, each of Tesla's models have a competitor of similar category and range that's order-of €5k cheaper.
Even with that aside, there's also the issue that Tesla doesn't have a broad range of vehicles, and there's now a lot of other competitors filling all the various niches, which means if all you want is a cheap electric city car you can get that for €17k* and don't need to start with the, what is it, €42k for a Model 3?
* For a Dacia Spring: https://www.dacia.de/nci-catalog.html?model.code=S1E&sortKey...
There is also the much cheaper Citroën Ami for just under €8k, but that's more of a car-shaped object, legally a quadricycle, but even then the point remains that it's filling in niches that Tesla doesn't: https://www.citroen.de/modelle/neuer-ami.html
dzhiurgis•2h ago
Weird exemption is Korean cars that cost far more. Go figure that out.
I agree Tesla's narrow range of options is probably THE issue. Like it or not, a lot of people's car buying is irrational. Flash looks, unrealistic range, tons of custom options, old habits (Korean EVs still ship a fricking engine start button). Tesla is the most rational car purchase out there (average looks, tons of features, tons of automation, mass produced so parts a dirt cheap). Most of rational buyers already got one.
rsynnott•1h ago
This might be an NZ trade policy thing; in Europe, Hyundai has electric cars susbstantially cheaper than the cheapest Tesla.
jaggs•1h ago
kmac_•3h ago
tossandthrow•3h ago
BYD is as old as Tesla (2003) and XPeng is more than 10 years old at this point.
kmac_•3h ago
tossandthrow•2h ago
Bringing a car on the market is quite regulated, so if you don't have adequate capital, it is really difficult to bring a new car to market in the EU.
kmac_•1h ago
MG, BYD, ORA, Haval, Omoda, Lynk & Co, NIO, Xpeng, Zeekr, Maxus, Leapmotor, Hongqi, Aiways, Chery, Jaecoo, BAIC, Forthing, DFSK, Seres, Voyah, SWM, JAC, Bestune, Skywell
ZeroGravitas•37m ago
Omoda is Chery for example.
MG and Maxus are both SAIC.
Haval and ORA are Great Wall.
A diagram as of 2024: https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D4D22AQE4uiRLMqkneQ/fee...
beAbU•36m ago
debian3•3h ago
dzhiurgis•2h ago
Koreans have far too many issues and Japanese are just making fun of themselves (albeit new Leaf finally might be decent).
rsynnott•1h ago
Just looking at a sampling of Irish prices across the low end (including grants):
Tesla Model 3: min 37,500eur
VW id.3 (European): min 31,780eur
Dacia Spring (European/Chinese): 17,000eur
Hyundai Inster (Korean): 20,000eur
Like, certainly in terms of minimum entry price, Telsa's very much on the expensive end.