The platform is designed around the idea that people don't just want resources, they want to understand the experience behind the recommendation. So instead of just sharing links, people add context explaining why each resource matters. For example - rather than posting "Great Photoshop tutorial," you'd write "This 10-minute video taught me the layer masking technique I used in my latest series."
Here's how Flokkk works differently: - Every submitted link requires an annotation explaining why it's valuable. - Community votes based on actual usefulness, not just engagement. - You see exactly who endorsed each resource and their reasoning (full transparency). - Topics get organized into peer-validated learning paths and resource collections.
The annotation requirement filters out low-effort submissions, while the voting system surfaces genuinely helpful content. We support all types of resources - YouTube videos, articles, courses, tools, even personal Google Sheets or templates.
Built this as a non-technical founder who learned to code specifically for this project - took 9 months from zero coding experience to launch.
The irony? Learning to code taught me exactly why we need better content curation - I wasted so much time on poor tutorials that good community filtering could have saved me.
You can try it out at https://www.flokkk.com/home where it's free to use.
Feel free to try it out and contribute your own curated resources. We'd love your feedback on the approach and how it could be made even better!