frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

ClawEmail: 1min setup for OpenClaw agents with Gmail, Docs

https://clawemail.com
1•aleks5678•46s ago•1 comments

UnAutomating the Economy: More Labor but at What Cost?

https://www.greshm.org/blog/unautomating-the-economy/
1•Suncho•7m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Gettorr – Stream magnet links in the browser via WebRTC (no install)

https://gettorr.com/
1•BenaouidateMed•8m ago•0 comments

Statin drugs safer than previously thought

https://www.semafor.com/article/02/06/2026/statin-drugs-safer-than-previously-thought
1•stareatgoats•10m ago•0 comments

Handy when you just want to distract yourself for a moment

https://d6.h5go.life/
1•TrendSpotterPro•11m ago•0 comments

More States Are Taking Aim at a Controversial Early Reading Method

https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/more-states-are-taking-aim-at-a-controversial-early-read...
1•lelanthran•13m ago•0 comments

AI will not save developer productivity

https://www.infoworld.com/article/4125409/ai-will-not-save-developer-productivity.html
1•indentit•18m ago•0 comments

How I do and don't use agents

https://twitter.com/jessfraz/status/2019975917863661760
1•tosh•24m ago•0 comments

BTDUex Safe? The Back End Withdrawal Anomalies

1•aoijfoqfw•27m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Compile-Time Vibe Coding

https://github.com/Michael-JB/vibecode
5•michaelchicory•29m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Ensemble – macOS App to Manage Claude Code Skills, MCPs, and Claude.md

https://github.com/O0000-code/Ensemble
1•IO0oI•32m ago•1 comments

PR to support XMPP channels in OpenClaw

https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/pull/9741
1•mickael•33m ago•0 comments

Twenty: A Modern Alternative to Salesforce

https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty
1•tosh•35m ago•0 comments

Raspberry Pi: More memory-driven price rises

https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/more-memory-driven-price-rises/
1•calcifer•40m ago•0 comments

Level Up Your Gaming

https://d4.h5go.life/
1•LinkLens•44m ago•1 comments

Di.day is a movement to encourage people to ditch Big Tech

https://itsfoss.com/news/di-day-celebration/
3•MilnerRoute•45m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI generated personal affirmations playing when your phone is locked

https://MyAffirmations.Guru
4•alaserm•46m ago•3 comments

Show HN: GTM MCP Server- Let AI Manage Your Google Tag Manager Containers

https://github.com/paolobietolini/gtm-mcp-server
1•paolobietolini•47m ago•0 comments

Launch of X (Twitter) API Pay-per-Use Pricing

https://devcommunity.x.com/t/announcing-the-launch-of-x-api-pay-per-use-pricing/256476
1•thinkingemote•48m ago•0 comments

Facebook seemingly randomly bans tons of users

https://old.reddit.com/r/facebookdisabledme/
1•dirteater_•49m ago•1 comments

Global Bird Count Event

https://www.birdcount.org/
1•downboots•49m ago•0 comments

What Is Ruliology?

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2026/01/what-is-ruliology/
2•soheilpro•51m ago•0 comments

Jon Stewart – One of My Favorite People – What Now? with Trevor Noah Podcast [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44uC12g9ZVk
2•consumer451•54m ago•0 comments

P2P crypto exchange development company

1•sonniya•1h ago•0 comments

Vocal Guide – belt sing without killing yourself

https://jesperordrup.github.io/vocal-guide/
2•jesperordrup•1h ago•0 comments

Write for Your Readers Even If They Are Agents

https://commonsware.com/blog/2026/02/06/write-for-your-readers-even-if-they-are-agents.html
1•ingve•1h ago•0 comments

Knowledge-Creating LLMs

https://tecunningham.github.io/posts/2026-01-29-knowledge-creating-llms.html
1•salkahfi•1h ago•0 comments

Maple Mono: Smooth your coding flow

https://font.subf.dev/en/
1•signa11•1h ago•0 comments

Sid Meier's System for Real-Time Music Composition and Synthesis

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5496962A/en
1•GaryBluto•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Slop News – HN front page now, but it's all slop

https://dosaygo-studio.github.io/hn-front-page-2035/slop-news
7•keepamovin•1h ago•2 comments
Open in hackernews

What's the difference between named functions and arrow functions in JavaScript?

https://jrsinclair.com/articles/2025/whats-the-difference-between-named-functions-and-arrow-functions/
46•jrsinclair•7mo ago

Comments

comrade1234•7mo ago
JavaScript used to be a nice prototype based programming language...

Anyway, I'm more interested in how this site is being published. I'm on iOS and in vertical format words are cutoff with dashes properly for that format and when I switch to landscape other words are cut off that fit that format.

Is this some simple css attribute I missed completely?

test1235•7mo ago
css hyphens?

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/hyphens

comrade1234•7mo ago
I totally missed that. :) as long as the browser has a hyphenation dictionary for the language being used it will work.
moritzwarhier•7mo ago
> JavaScript used to be a nice prototype based programming language

"this" binding depending on the call site never made sense to me. Why do you think it became worse with arrow functions and Function.prototype.bind?

In case I'm not misunderstanding you. Tbh I haven't read the article so I'm only responding to your first sentence, since the CSS hyphens thing has been cleared up already.

By the way, CSS hyphens have been my most-wanted feature ever when I was working for a web design agency. So glad to see it gain traction over the years.

There are JS libraries for this, and of course they cause ugly page reflow and/or overhead.

Prime example of what should be in the CSS domain, and such a frequent problem when putting real content into design templates.

WorldMaker•7mo ago
To be fair, most of these complaints about functions in JS are because its roots are still a nice prototype-based programming language and the `class` syntax sugar implies class-oriented things that JS doesn't deliver and confuses prototype-oriented features as class-oriented bugs. You can still use them as features, though we are getting close to the point where using them as features is an art form for arcane wizards that will make many, many JS users scream in terror and confusion.
fitsumbelay•7mo ago
one of my favorite JS bloggers, love his deep dives
JoeOfTexas•7mo ago
There is a bit more nuance in using `this` in a named function that wasn't covered. Named functions defined in classes are scoped outside of the class, meaning they are not bound to the class. To use `this` in your named function, you usually have to bind it in the constructor using `this.functionName.bind(this)`

Arrow functions defined within a class are scoped and bound to the class automatically. Hence, arrow functions do not require calling the .bind in constructor, and you can happily use `this` inside arrow functions.

moritzwarhier•7mo ago
The article misses even more nuance, independent from classes.

If you define

  const o = { a: "Hello", b() { return this.a;} }
then

  o.a()

will return "Hello"

while

  const b = o.b; // not a.b ...
  b();

will throw an error.

This predates generator functions and classes (which are only syntax sugar AFAIK).

And it seems like a glaring omission giving the submission title.

I'm ashamed though if it's in there and I missed it.

The behavior is called "late binding".

WorldMaker•7mo ago
Late binding is also what the above poster is complaining about and they mention the habit some have in class constructors for "early binding" to try to avoid it.
moritzwarhier•7mo ago
Thanks for explaining, maybe I was missing the point there.

I was replying with this because it happens without using the "class" keyword (or "constructor") at all.

Not sure what you mean with the class constructor thing, but that's on me. I still don't understand these properly:

> Named functions defined in classes are scoped outside of the class, meaning they are not bound to the class

> the habit some have in class constructors for "early binding" to try to avoid it.

You mean using sth like

  this.a = //...
in the constructor, using arrow functions?

I guess I'm missing something here.

That can also be done after the class was declared? The class keyword is only syntax sugar.

Anyway, I might be missing something important here.

That's why I brought up an example using an object literal, which has the prototype

  Object.prototype
Try it:

  const a = {};
  console.log(Object.getPrototypeOf(a) === Object.prototype); // logs "true"
These shenanigans are why I sometimes hate JS, but also agree that we should aim to understand the basics first.

I love MDN for that.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn_web_developme...

WorldMaker•7mo ago
The `class` keyword is as much "just" syntax sugar for stuff you can do without the `class` keyword. The behaviors are the same.

Late binding happens whether or not the function is a part of the Object's prototype chain or directly attached. JS is built so that's all mostly the same thing. That's why late binding exists. Maybe you copy a function from one prototype to another to create a new sort of prototype with a bit of "code-sharing", which is the same if you want to copy a function directly from one object to another. You want that function to work in all these cases, you don't want to redefine the function explicitly for a different kind of prototype or a different kind of object, you want to pick up what it is bound to by how it is called (thus late binding). Late binding is an ancient feature of JS that feels like a bug if you think `class` works like it does in OO languages like C++ or Java or C#. Late binding feels like a bug if you think of an Object's prototype as being a strongly formed contract and not a runtime object that itself can change at any time, or can be used as a lego brick to construct other types of objects and code-sharing beyond traditional class-based OOP "inheritance" models.

The difference between a "regular object" and thing constructed from a `class` in JS is effectively nonexistent. It's the same stuff, just a few syntax niceties. (In the old days, it was a lot harder to build a clean prototype, `class` makes it a lot cleaner. But that's all it does, it makes it cleaner to write, but under the hood it is entirely the same as it was.)

> in the constructor, using arrow functions?

The example above was the related but similar thing of doing `this.a = this.a.bind(this)` in a class constructor. It's very similar to using `this.a = () => …` arrow functions to early bind `this`. (Assigning a function to itself in a constructor with a `bind()` is also an idiom pattern that predates arrow functions and class syntax. Constructors predate class syntax, but they used to look a lot different. You can still write that form of constructor if you want, but class syntax is a lot cleaner.)

Late binding is an old feature that feels like a bug today, so a lot of people work very hard to early bind functions or only ever use arrow functions because they don't trust late binding.

moritzwarhier•7mo ago
Thank you for responding!

Yes, I think we are on the same page. I did not want to include "legacy" prototype-based inheritance examples because I'm on a phone and didn't want to make complexity explode here.

Also I made a weird statement here:

> That can also be done after the class was declared?

That doesn't make much sense for binding "this" to the class that was declared, I wsd mixing up arrow function class properties inside the class declaration with adding prototype properties (which is exactly what one doesn't want for classes with many instances).

In the scope of the class declaration, all methods of adding methods to the prototype are awkward, I guess.

Regarding the "early-binding" using .bind or arrow functions in constructor, I see your points, and it's the subtle and hard-to-explain differences that are really annoying.

JS really requires some discipline and sticking to a pit of success, while it's still essential to know the basics.

> Late binding is an old feature that feels like a bug today, so a lot of people work very hard to early bind functions or only ever use arrow functions because they don't trust late binding

Yes, that's what I was going at, thanks for making clear the difference between arrow functions (lexical scoping) and using `bind` (arbitrarily fixed "this").

I was lately (no pun!! really coincidence, it just wasn't only recently) using late binding with object literals in tests with Jest and TS and had to ignore TS there, it's pretty much the major reason I'm commenting here. It was convenient and succinct for a mock object implementing an interface otherwise used by class instances to use late binding.

postalrat•7mo ago
Of course it's an error. 'a' isn't defined.
moritzwarhier•7mo ago
Lol, thanks, edited
fud101•7mo ago
I appreciate the article but I was waiting for Monads to appear.
nayuki•7mo ago
> Somewhat confusingly, we can also give our function expression a name. One that’s separate from the variable name [...] This throws an error. If we can’t use that name, then what’s the point of it? Well, takeyWhiley will show up if we throw an error in our code.

There is another reason: If you give a name to a function expression, the function can directly recurse on itself without the use of combinators. For example:

  const factorial = function fact(n) {
      if (n == 0)
          return 1;
      else
          return n * fact(n - 1);
  };
Ashkee•7mo ago
Named functions give you a clear function name which helps in debugging and recursion. For simpler syntax and capturing the surrounding context, arrow functions are handy. You might want to explore MailsAI for organizing your JavaScript code snippets efficiently, it made my workflow smoother.