original title: Documents reveal EU states saw EU Court of Justice as an obstacle to mass surveillance that prioritized privacy over law enforcement access

After doing a course in uni in ethics of Ai I made my final essay about chat control and breaking encryption, somebody on reddit asked me to read it. If anybody is interested, the "political" section gives a lot of information about the current debate on eu and encryption. It's not up to date to the the latest developments, but it's definitely better than nothing. There are also a lot of references that are useful if someone wants to dig further. You can read it here (truly, if you're on hn save time and skip the technical debate): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A8x4a76ArVDil1xaUe3jF42p...

Regarding this, the question "is e2e weaker if anybody else have the key" is ridiculous, and I feel very negative towards politician having absolutely no clue when talking about encryption. I'm not asking to understand encryption well, just to know why the position of cs people are so against such measures that eu commission would like to adopt