frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: Stacky – certain block game clone

https://www.susmel.com/stacky/
1•Keyframe•10s ago•0 comments

AIII: A public benchmark for AI narrative and political independence

https://github.com/GRMPZQUIDOS/AIII
1•GRMPZ23•17s ago•0 comments

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes

https://xorvoid.com/sectorc.html
1•valyala•1m ago•0 comments

The API Is a Dead End; Machines Need a Labor Economy

1•bot_uid_life•2m ago•0 comments

Digital Iris [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg_2MAgS_pE
1•Jyaif•3m ago•0 comments

New wave of GLP-1 drugs is coming–and they're stronger than Wegovy and Zepbound

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-glp-1-weight-loss-drugs-are-coming-and-theyre-stro...
3•randycupertino•5m ago•0 comments

Convert tempo (BPM) to millisecond durations for musical note subdivisions

https://brylie.music/apps/bpm-calculator/
1•brylie•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tasty A.F.

https://tastyaf.recipes/about
1•adammfrank•8m ago•0 comments

The Contagious Taste of Cancer

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/history-matters/contagious-taste-cancer
1•Thevet•9m ago•0 comments

U.S. Jobs Disappear at Fastest January Pace Since Great Recession

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/02/05/us-jobs-disappear-at-fastest-january-pace-sin...
1•alephnerd•10m ago•0 comments

Bithumb mistakenly hands out $195M in Bitcoin to users in 'Random Box' giveaway

https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2026-02-07/business/finance/Crypto-exchange-Bithumb-mis...
1•giuliomagnifico•10m ago•0 comments

Beyond Agentic Coding

https://haskellforall.com/2026/02/beyond-agentic-coding
3•todsacerdoti•11m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw ClawHub Broken Windows Theory – If basic sorting isn't working what is?

https://www.loom.com/embed/e26a750c0c754312b032e2290630853d
1•kaicianflone•13m ago•0 comments

OpenBSD Copyright Policy

https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
1•Panino•14m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw Creator: Why 80% of Apps Will Disappear

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uzGDAoNOZc
2•schwentkerr•18m ago•0 comments

What Happens When Technical Debt Vanishes?

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11316905
2•blenderob•19m ago•0 comments

AI Is Finally Eating Software's Total Market: Here's What's Next

https://vinvashishta.substack.com/p/ai-is-finally-eating-softwares-total
3•gmays•19m ago•0 comments

Computer Science from the Bottom Up

https://www.bottomupcs.com/
2•gurjeet•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A toy compiler I built in high school (runs in browser)

https://vire-lang.web.app
1•xeouz•21m ago•1 comments

You don't need Mac mini to run OpenClaw

https://runclaw.sh
1•rutagandasalim•22m ago•0 comments

Learning to Reason in 13 Parameters

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04118
2•nicholascarolan•24m ago•0 comments

Convergent Discovery of Critical Phenomena Mathematics Across Disciplines

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22389
1•energyscholar•24m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Will GPU and RAM prices ever go down?

1•alentred•25m ago•1 comments

From hunger to luxury: The story behind the most expensive rice (2025)

https://www.cnn.com/travel/japan-expensive-rice-kinmemai-premium-intl-hnk-dst
2•mooreds•26m ago•0 comments

Substack makes money from hosting Nazi newsletters

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/feb/07/revealed-how-substack-makes-money-from-hosting-nazi...
6•mindracer•27m ago•0 comments

A New Crypto Winter Is Here and Even the Biggest Bulls Aren't Certain Why

https://www.wsj.com/finance/currencies/a-new-crypto-winter-is-here-and-even-the-biggest-bulls-are...
1•thm•27m ago•0 comments

Moltbook was peak AI theater

https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/02/06/1132448/moltbook-was-peak-ai-theater/
2•Brajeshwar•27m ago•0 comments

Why Claude Cowork is a math problem Indian IT can't solve

https://restofworld.org/2026/indian-it-ai-stock-crash-claude-cowork/
3•Brajeshwar•27m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Built an space travel calculator with vanilla JavaScript v2

https://www.cosmicodometer.space/
2•captainnemo729•28m ago•0 comments

Why a 175-Year-Old Glassmaker Is Suddenly an AI Superstar

https://www.wsj.com/tech/corning-fiber-optics-ai-e045ba3b
1•Brajeshwar•28m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Military leaders aghast as Zuck crashes classified Oval Office meeting

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-oval-office-mark-zuckerberg-security-b2781215.html
59•CharlesW•7mo ago

Comments

mcswell•7mo ago
We knew that Hegseth didn't understand (or didn't believe in) security. It's not surprising that Trump, who had highly classified documents laying around in Mar a Lago, doesn't either.

Years ago, I was in a classified meeting in a SCIF when someone's cell phone went off. The person was immediately escorted out of the room--probably their clearance was revoked, and they were told not to come back. Having a cell phone in a SCIF is bad enough, having it go off inside the SCIF is even worse--and answering it during a classified meeting (or just answering it inside a SCIF) is cause for trouble big.

ModernMech•7mo ago
Huh... I had always imagined SCIFs were like faraday cages, so a cell phone wouldn't be able to send or receive any signals.
derektank•7mo ago
That would be prohibitively expensive in most cases.
sam_lowry_•7mo ago
O'rly?

These are not only Faraday cages, but they also actively transmit noise.

It's open information since the 70-ies.

A mobile phone will not work inside.

mcswell•7mo ago
(OP here) I kid you not, the person whose phone went off inside the SCIF was holding his phone next to a window, complaining about the poor signal. He was some kind of scientist or engineer who had been given a clearance as an "expert" adviser to listen to and grade presentations by people like me. I'm sure he didn't usually work in a SCIF--this might have been his first (and probably last) time inside one.
xlii•7mo ago
In case anyone else didn’t know: SCIF stands for "sensitive compartmented information facility" (I assume ;))

The thing with security is that usually people treat it like a joke or very very seriously. I think that was the latter.

FL410•7mo ago
Why would a cell phone even work in a SCIF?
sitzkrieg•7mo ago
its not a faraday cage. just built to spec
HappySweeney•7mo ago
I'm a bit surprised the entire thing isn't in a faraday cage.
russdill•7mo ago
If the door is open, signals can get in. Additionally, "gone off" could mean an alarm
sitzkrieg•7mo ago
i have seen someone lose their clearance and sap after wearing a fitbit into the doorway
sugarpimpdorsey•7mo ago
This description of the oval office as some super-secret meeting space seems like a gross mischaracterization in an attempt to fabricate a controversy or gain clicks.

I mean, it has windows.

If this was true, the situation room wouldn't exist.

The oval office seems more like a busy CEO's office with an open door policy. Bill Maher confirmed on his podcast the current administration turned the annex (where blowjobs were dispensed during the Clinton years) into the merch room where they store the red hats.

ck2•7mo ago
All the so-called "guardrails" are long gone now

It's just down to a handful of people able to get the Tyrant King to sign off on anything they put in front of him

The scariest perspective is this is only 150 days in.

So imagine what happens 150 weeks later when all bets are off and "sure why not who would stop us" kicks in.

I am truly morbidly curious what happens to a country when 15+ million people disappear in just four years though.

beefnugs•7mo ago
huh i thought this new cheap mystery meat would be crickets, but this tastes like mexican

Or the slightly more humanitarian version: Damn all those crocodiles are huge now, at least they kept the cute hats we put on them

yks•7mo ago
Random individuals without clearance and sometimes with ties to Russia (talking about DOGE here) have access to all government IT systems, including databases of the military personnel, and the military leaders are now aghast at Zuck? I don't know how people can take "clearance" or "classified" seriously anymore.
bediger4000•7mo ago
Yes. "Security violations" are just another set of laws that bind, but does not protect, any member of an outgroup.
ModernMech•7mo ago
It's incredible, because the entire basis laid out by the media and Republicans to reject Clinton in 2016 was that she would not respect security protocols. 10 years later and all the people who said she can't be POTUS because she would give secrets away to Russia are now doing the same as her and worse.
CamperBob2•7mo ago
Exactly. Every accusation from a Republican is either a confession in disguise, a plan in progress, or an unfulfilled wish.
subjectsigma•7mo ago
Makes me rabidly furious. “Rules for thee, but not for me.”
jrs235•7mo ago
The laws and rules are now selectively enforced only against those that don't submit to the head of enforcement. The head of enforcement may ignore the laws however they wish...

Four legs good. Two legs better.

SAI_Peregrinus•7mo ago
They're conservatives. That's the core premise of the ideology. For each "thing", prevent any progress that helps anyone other than the conservatives. If previous progress has made things worse for conservatives, revert that progress.
subjectsigma•7mo ago
No, that’s stupid. You’re replying to someone who would consider themselves fairly conservative. And in my mind conservatives follow and respect the rules and traditions. This is not following or respecting anything.

Though I will say, it’s been very clear to me since Trump ran in 2016 that he is not actually a “conservative” and that the GOP has been crumbling into degeneracy under him

Incipient•7mo ago
Trump is a businessman, at best, and a snake oil salesman or cult leader more accurately. He talks and people follow.

He's definitely not a 'conservative'.

andrekandre•7mo ago

  > GOP has been crumbling into degeneracy under him
agree, though i might offer the notion that they were already crumbling and thats how he got in the door in the first place
toomanyrichies•6mo ago
The only novel element that Trump brought to the GOP was profiting from his office financially, through meme coins, extortion via threats of executive orders, gifts of $400 million aircraft, foreign emissaries booking stays in Trump-owned hotels, etc. But American conservatism has always been destructive at its core.

Who would you consider to be a standard-bearer of "conservatism" as you define it? Ronald Reagan? Barry Goldwater? Phyllis Schlafly? William F. Buckley Jr.? Rush Limbaugh? Newt Gingrich? Karl Rove? Tucker Carlson? Lee Atwater? John Ehrlichman?

Because those are the same people who paved the way for Trump et al.

----

1. Ronald Reagan

- Legitimized the use of cultural wedge issues (e.g. "welfare queens," states' rights at the Neshoba County Fair) that racialized politics for electoral gain.

- His sunny rhetoric masked an increasing detachment from policy detail, paving the way for style-over-substance populism.

- His deregulation and anti-government messaging sowed distrust in institutions, which Trump exploited more fully.

2. Barry Goldwater

- His radical anti-government ideology and rejection of civil rights legislation marked the beginning of the GOP's shift toward Southern racial resentment and individualist extremism.

- His campaign normalized ideological purity tests and rejection of moderation in the Republican Party.

3. Phyllis Schlafly

- Promoted a cultural traditionalism rooted in opposition to feminism, secularism, and elites (core parts of Trumpist rhetoric).

- In her later years, she explicitly supported Trump and authored The Conservative Case for Trump.

4. William F. Buckley Jr.

- Helped unify disparate elements of the Right, including libertarians, traditionalists, and anti-communists. He also flirted with exclusionary ideas (e.g., defending segregationists early in his career).

- His gatekeeping role arguably failed to permanently expel conspiracists and racists from the movement, who re-emerged in Trumpism.

5. Rush Limbaugh

- Arguably did more than anyone to mainstream conservative media as a vehicle for outrage, identity politics, and misinformation.

- He regularly mocked facts, science, and expertise. He directly influenced the tone and method of Trump's political communication.

6. Newt Gingrich

- Gingrich normalized scorched-earth partisanship and delegitimized opponents as enemies, revolutionizing GOP politics in the process.

- His "Contract with America" and leadership style eroded congressional decorum and promoted grievance-based politics.

- He created the climate where performative politics and obstructionism became normal.

7. Karl Rove

- Pioneered data-driven wedge-issue campaigning and appealed to the Christian Right in ways that prioritized winning over policy consistency.

- Promoted executive power and political tribalism, both of which Trump exploited.

- His famous quote ("We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality...") precipitated the GOP's conversion to post-truth politics. [1]

8. Tucker Carlson

- Carlson became one of Trumpism's most effective propagandists, repackaging white nationalist themes in more polished rhetoric.

- Embraced anti-immigrant sentiment, anti-elite populism, and authoritarian sympathies—all central to Trump's base.

- Helped shift the conservative movement fully into post-truth, post-policy identity politics.

9. Lee Atwater

- Helped refine the Southern Strategy (using racial resentment in coded language) to mobilize white voters.

- The Willie Horton ad (1988). Exploited white fears of Black criminality, linking Democratic opponent Michael Dukakis to a Black man who committed violent crimes while on furlough.

- Trump’s political brand is built on humiliation, name-calling (“Crooked Hillary,” “Sleepy Joe”), and no-limits partisanship. This directly echoes Atwater’s ethic (Atwater said he'd make Willie Horton into Dukakis' running mate, and expressed willingness to go as negative as needed to destroy opponents).

10. John Ehrlichman

"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."

John Ehrlichman, as quoted by journalist Dan Baum in Harper’s, April 2016.

----

I posit that any philosophical / political difference between most conservative figureheads that you might name, and Trump himself, is more a difference in degree than a difference in kind:

Dog-whistle racism => overt bigotry

Narrative spin => post-truth politics

Ruthless attacks => personality-driven dominance

Cultural wedge issues => culture war extremism

A political philosophy that is so fundamentally rooted in asking “What about me?” instead of “What about them?” was always going to end this way.

1. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/846190-we-re-an-empire-now-...

sitzkrieg•7mo ago
so much for need to know. lets peruse the boxes he packed out LOL
bananapub•7mo ago
remember when the American Right pretended to care about security or propriety
rubberwoodneck•7mo ago
When you elect a clown, the palace turns into a circus.
akmarinov•7mo ago
Their boss is a news network host and their commander in chief is a reality tv star - why are they aghast?