This is interesting. Would doctors build/assemble their own machines?
Definitely not the case with newer forms of imaging.
Maybe worth pointing out that both doctors and laboratory scientists historically had a close relationship with glass blowers and glass work. Many doctors back then would have known someone who was able to make them a Crookes tube (often themselves). A sufficiently hard vacuum pump was I think the trickiest part?
For example, 94% of OBGYNs in the US that have training for high risk pregnancies, offer NIPT tests [0].
Basically anyone in the US who is pregnant can order a NIPT test for very little money.
None of the dates in this "article" are correct and are off by a hundred years.
Worthless and don't waste your time reading it. Go to ChatGPT if you're bored and want more lies and invented bullshit
Brave world we live in now
For shoe fitting there were actually x-ray machines in shoe stores. They were widely used, especially when buying shoes for children. Wikipedia has a nice description [1]:
> The shoe-fitting fluoroscope, also sold under the names X-ray Shoe Fitter, Pedoscope and Foot-o-scope, was an X-ray fluoroscope machine installed in shoe stores from the 1920s until about the 1970s. The device was a metal construction covered in finished wood, approximately 4 feet (1.2 m) tall in the shape of short column, with a ledge with an opening through which the standing customer (adult or child) would put their feet and look through a viewing porthole at the top of the fluoroscope down at the X-ray view of the feet and shoes. Two other viewing portholes on either side enabled the parent and a sales assistant to observe the toes being wiggled to show how much room for the toes there was inside the shoe. The bones of the feet were clearly visible, as was the outline of the shoe, including the stitching around the edges.
JohnMakin•7mo ago
dhosek•7mo ago
bawolff•7mo ago
Or at least it would be if they did it once, but they made the same mistake multiple times which is bizarre. I dont know what to think about that.
auserisme•7mo ago
tinymagician•7mo ago
I used an LLM to gather sources but wrote it myself. The writing having flow errors/grammar is more just a function of poor proofreading on my end - my brain skips words and flow sometimes. I'm not a great writer.
I see your point with the "bullet" namely - Some surgeons doubted the image quality, felt bullet could be left safely in the body, and worried about patient privacy (seeing through clothes). It should read "Some surgeons doubted the image quality. Others felt that the bullet could be left safely in the body and worried about patient privacy (seeing through clothes). The article has been updated.
Thanks for everyone's comments, I appreciate them.