I have to say that the one regarding the rule of thirds was... wrong. Thats always been a rule to break, and square isn't even close to a new format. Shooting 120 film in 6x6 is, and was, common. Its what the Apollo Astronauts took with them. Its also my favorite format.
It took a supreme court case to declare that photography includes some amount of artistic expression, without which it wouldn't be eligible for copyright: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burrow-Giles_Lithographic_Co._...
At the time it was debatable whether or not photographs were really art, because the photographer need do nothing more than release the shutter. There was probably some protectionism involved, as photography put a lot of portrait artists out of work.
Most things regarding photography mentioned in the article are still important and relevant. There's no death of landscape orientation, just that our primary displays for looking at photos mostly posted on social media are portrait. However the rule of thirds still applies regardless of whether you use a mobile phone or a DSLR.
Anyone can pick up a mobile phone and take a photo or a video, but the fundamental rules of photography and videography still apply if you want to do things seriously and properly. The article talks about manipulation
Yes its easier to pick up a mobile phone and take a good photo compared to picking up a DSLR. But that doesn't mean the fundamentals aren't important in making both of those devices take incredible photos.
Lastly, the article acts like decades ago photographers weren't taking photos with their DSLR's all dialed and dropping them into photoshop to retouch photos.
sherdil2022•5h ago
I hate vertical photos and videos too. I hate square photos and videos as well. But if the consumption is vertical (or square), you want to produce as needed.
PaulHoule•5h ago
I often use the rule of thirds in square prints.