https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/07/us-court-cancels...
It's definitely a much better link.
It actually describes what the ftc did wrong and even links to the decision. The guardian link doesn't do either, and so doesn't actually provide for meaningful discussion.
I understand there is a "by the book" process that should be respected, but this seems very fishy to me. I am certain the regulation would have passed had the tables been turned (meaning the companies would benefit from that said regulation)
Cheer2171•4h ago
justahuman74•3h ago
davidmurdoch•3h ago
atoav•3h ago
hammock•3h ago
pfg_•3h ago
nothercastle•3h ago
greesil•3h ago
But in this vein, maybe if you can get the chatbot to disgorge its secret then you get to unsubscribe.
I hear disputing credit card transactions are a thing, though.
ryandrake•3h ago
Gigachad•3h ago
0xbadcafebee•2h ago
I have been getting charged $7.99 from Google every month for a year. I don't know what the charge is and it isn't linked to any of my accounts. I have contacted every single possible Google support line that exists to the public. They refuse to provide any means for me to show them I own this credit card and that I want the charges stopped. But of course, my credit card company also has no human support rep, and their automated support line tells me I need to talk to the merchant. So I cancelled the card. Guess what? They're still processing the fees from the old card, like it never cancelled.
Aeolun•2h ago
johnfn•2h ago
tomhow•1h ago
The guidelines ask us to avoid comments like this:
Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.
Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.
Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html