I can totally see why people want to know the names of people in Epstein’s orbit, but I’m struggling to understand any public interest basis for releasing people’s addresses and telephone numbers. We have no idea who among this list are normal business contacts, who are abusers and who are victims, but some of these are almost certainly victims (who have now been doxxed on top of their other woes).
mystraline•6mo ago
1. The US government refused to accept this in evidence
2. These aren't 'nobodies'. These people are highly connected in criminal enterprise, corruption, and government, along with victims.
3. There were claims by the DOJ of what the redacted version contained and didn't. Those claims are lies, as proven here.
4. This is metadata of who Epstein was connected with, and connections. This is metadata, and high quality at that.
5. Doxxing isn't a crime. But, child rape kind of is. And so is conspiracy, money and influence laundering, along with corruption.
seanhunter•6mo ago
mystraline•6mo ago
2. These aren't 'nobodies'. These people are highly connected in criminal enterprise, corruption, and government, along with victims.
3. There were claims by the DOJ of what the redacted version contained and didn't. Those claims are lies, as proven here.
4. This is metadata of who Epstein was connected with, and connections. This is metadata, and high quality at that.
5. Doxxing isn't a crime. But, child rape kind of is. And so is conspiracy, money and influence laundering, along with corruption.