After months of conversations with experienced Magento 2 developers about AI tooling, the feedback is brutal: "AI delivers horrible code," "It's fundamentally stupid," "We tried it and went back to writing everything ourselves."
They're not wrong about their experience—they're wrong about the cause.
Recent METR research on AI-experienced developers found productivity reductions, not gains, when using AI tools for complex tasks. The problem isn't AI capability. It's that most developers treat AI agents like junior developers: throw requirements over the wall and expect clean code back.
This approach fails catastrophically because it ignores fundamental limitations like the "Lost in the Middle" problem, where LLMs degrade performance on long contexts, and error propagation in multi-step reasoning.
The implementations that work treat AI agents as specialized components in larger systems, with proper validation, error handling, and human oversight. Success comes from better architecture, not better prompts.
*Full technical breakdown of production-tested patterns inside.
herrmaier•6mo ago
They're not wrong about their experience—they're wrong about the cause.
Recent METR research on AI-experienced developers found productivity reductions, not gains, when using AI tools for complex tasks. The problem isn't AI capability. It's that most developers treat AI agents like junior developers: throw requirements over the wall and expect clean code back.
This approach fails catastrophically because it ignores fundamental limitations like the "Lost in the Middle" problem, where LLMs degrade performance on long contexts, and error propagation in multi-step reasoning.
The implementations that work treat AI agents as specialized components in larger systems, with proper validation, error handling, and human oversight. Success comes from better architecture, not better prompts.
*Full technical breakdown of production-tested patterns inside.