The lack of vector support really shows, as most geekbench benchmarks use SIMD, but MT performance is quite good.
brucehoult•6mo ago
> The lack of vector support really shows, as most geekbench benchmarks use SIMD
Despite that it's beating the newer gen 1.8 GHz Pi 4 (my Pi 4 is 1.5 GHz) single-threaded on everything except Image Compression and Machine Learning ... nice.
If the SG2380 had happened (US sanctions prevented it, for those who don't know) we should have a RISC-V board beating the Pi 5 by now, and be less than two years behind Arm. (or three years for RK3588 Rock 5)
I think we'll have something competitive with Radxa Orion O6 in the next 12 months, only 1 year behind -- and ARMv9 and RVA23 are *really* comparable in features.
evanjrowley•6mo ago
With an adapter that splits the M.2 into multiple SATA connections, this might be a great Mini-ITX motherboard for some NAS hardware that I've been hoping to revive.
camel-cdr•6mo ago
vs 1.8GHz SiFive P550: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseli...
Is about 30% faster ST, but a lot faster MT. It's 400% faster on the MT clang compilation benchmark, so this may be a good build server.
vs 1.8GHz Pi4: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseli...
vs 2.4GHz Pi5: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/23667112?baseli...
The lack of vector support really shows, as most geekbench benchmarks use SIMD, but MT performance is quite good.
brucehoult•6mo ago
Despite that it's beating the newer gen 1.8 GHz Pi 4 (my Pi 4 is 1.5 GHz) single-threaded on everything except Image Compression and Machine Learning ... nice.
If the SG2380 had happened (US sanctions prevented it, for those who don't know) we should have a RISC-V board beating the Pi 5 by now, and be less than two years behind Arm. (or three years for RK3588 Rock 5)
I think we'll have something competitive with Radxa Orion O6 in the next 12 months, only 1 year behind -- and ARMv9 and RVA23 are *really* comparable in features.