frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Smart Homes Are Terrible

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/smart-homes-technology/685867/
1•tusslewake•1m ago•0 comments

What I haven't figured out

https://macwright.com/2026/01/29/what-i-havent-figured-out
1•stevekrouse•1m ago•0 comments

KPMG pressed its auditor to pass on AI cost savings

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2026/02/06/kpmg-pressed-its-auditor-to-pass-on-ai-cost-savings/
1•cainxinth•2m ago•0 comments

Open-source Claude skill that optimizes Hinge profiles. Pretty well.

https://twitter.com/b1rdmania/status/2020155122181869666
1•birdmania•2m ago•1 comments

First Proof

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05192
2•samasblack•4m ago•1 comments

I squeezed a BERT sentiment analyzer into 1GB RAM on a $5 VPS

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/trendscope-market-scanner
1•mohammede•5m ago•0 comments

Kagi Translate

https://translate.kagi.com
1•microflash•6m ago•0 comments

Building Interactive C/C++ workflows in Jupyter through Clang-REPL [video]

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/QX3RPH-building_interactive_cc_workflows_in_jupyter_throug...
1•stabbles•7m ago•0 comments

Tactical tornado is the new default

https://olano.dev/blog/tactical-tornado/
1•facundo_olano•9m ago•0 comments

Full-Circle Test-Driven Firmware Development with OpenClaw

https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/02/07/full-circle-test-driven-firmware-development-with-openclaw/
1•ptorrone•9m ago•0 comments

Automating Myself Out of My Job – Part 2

https://blog.dsa.club/automation-series/automating-myself-out-of-my-job-part-2/
1•funnyfoobar•9m ago•0 comments

Google staff call for firm to cut ties with ICE

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgjg98vmzjo
24•tartoran•10m ago•1 comments

Dependency Resolution Methods

https://nesbitt.io/2026/02/06/dependency-resolution-methods.html
1•zdw•10m ago•0 comments

Crypto firm apologises for sending Bitcoin users $40B by mistake

https://www.msn.com/en-ie/money/other/crypto-firm-apologises-for-sending-bitcoin-users-40-billion...
1•Someone•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: iPlotCSV: CSV Data, Visualized Beautifully for Free

https://www.iplotcsv.com/demo
1•maxmoq•11m ago•0 comments

There's no such thing as "tech" (Ten years later)

https://www.anildash.com/2026/02/06/no-such-thing-as-tech/
1•headalgorithm•12m ago•0 comments

List of unproven and disproven cancer treatments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unproven_and_disproven_cancer_treatments
1•brightbeige•12m ago•0 comments

Me/CFS: The blind spot in proactive medicine (Open Letter)

https://github.com/debugmeplease/debug-ME
1•debugmeplease•13m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: What are the word games do you play everyday?

1•gogo61•15m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Paper Arena – A social trading feed where only AI agents can post

https://paperinvest.io/arena
1•andrenorman•17m ago•0 comments

TOSTracker – The AI Training Asymmetry

https://tostracker.app/analysis/ai-training
1•tldrthelaw•21m ago•0 comments

The Devil Inside GitHub

https://blog.melashri.net/micro/github-devil/
2•elashri•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Distill – Migrate LLM agents from expensive to cheap models

https://github.com/ricardomoratomateos/distill
1•ricardomorato•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Sigma Runtime – Maintaining 100% Fact Integrity over 120 LLM Cycles

https://github.com/sigmastratum/documentation/tree/main/sigma-runtime/SR-053
1•teugent•22m ago•0 comments

Make a local open-source AI chatbot with access to Fedora documentation

https://fedoramagazine.org/how-to-make-a-local-open-source-ai-chatbot-who-has-access-to-fedora-do...
1•jadedtuna•23m ago•0 comments

Introduce the Vouch/Denouncement Contribution Model by Mitchellh

https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/10559
1•samtrack2019•23m ago•0 comments

Software Factories and the Agentic Moment

https://factory.strongdm.ai/
1•mellosouls•24m ago•1 comments

The Neuroscience Behind Nutrition for Developers and Founders

https://comuniq.xyz/post?t=797
1•01-_-•24m ago•0 comments

Bang bang he murdered math {the musical } (2024)

https://taylor.town/bang-bang
1•surprisetalk•24m ago•0 comments

A Night Without the Nerds – Claude Opus 4.6, Field-Tested

https://konfuzio.com/en/a-night-without-the-nerds-claude-opus-4-6-in-the-field-test/
1•konfuzio•26m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Amazon and the “Profitless Business Model” Fallacy

https://www.eugenewei.com/blog/2013/10/25/amazon-and-the-profitless-business-model-narrative
102•serviette•6mo ago

Comments

aaronbrethorst•6mo ago
(2013)
turnsout•6mo ago
An important note, because Amazon is now profitable (though not wildly so, given their revenue)
adventured•6mo ago
$651 billion in revenue, $71 billion in operating income. They're approaching wildly profitable for an extremely large business. To be that big and to eclipse a 10% op income margin is exceptional. It's closing in on three times the margin of Walmart (obviously Amazon is making their margin in AWS and ads, not retail).

$71 billion in operating income is so exceptional only seven other companies in history have gotten that large: Apple, Microsoft, Google, Nvidia, Facebook, Exxon and Aramco (if you count them as a company). And importantly, that $71 billion is rapidly expanding - it has doubled just since fiscal 2023. In 15 months sales increased $76 billion and op income increased by $35 billion.

The spigot is flowing. $100b in op income is likely not far away.

turnsout•6mo ago
I guess that’s fair—10% is impressive at that scale
a_c•6mo ago
The 2013 me wouldn’t make any sense out of this article. I’m glad the Theseus ship worked a fair bit on me
CGMthrowaway•6mo ago
Is the whole gist of this article basically, "start with your fixed cost business model and reinvest all proceeds into growth and scale"? What else am I missing?
agentcoops•6mo ago
They bury the important point halfway through the article: Amazon is a free-cash-flow machine and it has almost always been so. The distinction is subtle [1], but consistent (and ideally ever-growing) free-cash-flow is what really matters in valuing a highly capitalized company, even if the firm has always re-invested it each quarter to date. The important point to investors is that the firm's re-investment is a decision -- the company is not brittle to economic downturn and any quarter could decide to payout investors through share buyback etc.

Copious free-cash-flow every quarter is why software companies generally have higher valuations than traditional industries and why it was novel that Amazon, which is not obviously a software company, behaves as one financially.

[1] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflow.asp

CGMthrowaway•6mo ago
Makes sense thanks. Software isnt the only industry where FCF matters most either
ljlolel•6mo ago
What else?
vineyardmike•6mo ago
This business model was made famous by cable companies. They’d undergo expensive built-out to be the cable provider in a town, then benefit from a continuous subscription revenue for literally decades.
ljlolel•6mo ago
insurance

Famously Warren buffet.

CGMthrowaway•6mo ago
Anything capital intensive. Telecom was a good example. Oil & gas (they often have dividends tho) , real estate, anything that is a PE target, really every company though since we are living in a "post P/E" world
klank•6mo ago
> any quarter could decide to payout investors through share buyback etc.

Your etc. is layoffs. In this example, the "free-cash-flow" is people's salaries. I'm not personally comfortable with it being considered such a liquid asset.

vineyardmike•6mo ago
> Your etc. is layoffs. In this example, the "free-cash-flow" is people's salaries. I'm not personally comfortable with it being considered such a liquid asset.

It’s almost certainly, in the case of Amazon, data centers and fulfillment centers and trucks and planes and heavy equipment.

Unfortunately, you are probably viewed as a liquid asset by your management.

bluefirebrand•6mo ago
> Unfortunately, you are probably viewed as a liquid asset by your management.

What a rotten world we live in

agentcoops•6mo ago
For the record, I wasn't justifying the world that has created these incentives. In order to understand (maybe even someday change) the rottenness of the world, it's important to avoid the sort of reasoning that the OP critiques, which sees everything as just a sort of arbitrary maliciousness, rather than understanding the very concrete institutional mechanisms by which it has perversely become 'rational' to view everything outside a few profit centers as a 'liquid asset.' If a firm doesn't generate free-cash-flow, which is very very difficult outside the software industry, it will not receive significant capital investment and will be dependent on debt/profits. This impacts not just the life of employees, but limits what endeavors are funded at all, i.e. in part why it is that "software is eating the world." How to change those incentives is a much more difficult, but real problem.
ethan_smith•6mo ago
You're missing the strategic focus on long-term unit economics and customer lifetime value, where Amazon prioritizes sustainable margin structures within each business unit while accepting delayed profitability at the consolidated level.
troupo•6mo ago
Since then, Amazon kept growing and eating other markets (see AWS), or failing to eat markets (see Alexa) while still producing a shitton of money to finance all of that.

However, most of the rest of the industry simply collectively decided that profits don't matter. Most companies of past 10-15 years stopped caring about profits, and only talk about revenue. The are now only two goals in mind:

- survive long enough on unlimited investor money to be sold to the highest bidder and be immediately shutdown

- survive long enough on unlimited investor money to try and corner a market through investor-subdidized price dumping and near-illegal business practices, and then maybe look at how to get some of the lost money back, maybe

axus•6mo ago
Get bought by IBM, Oracle, or Broadcom, and let them be the villains.
teddyh•6mo ago
Once the exit is finalized, who cares about the customers? That’s not my department, says Wernher von Braun.
criemen•6mo ago
Thanks for the reminder! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjDEsGZLbio
masfuerte•6mo ago
You may not be aware that Tom Lehrer has released all his songs into the public domain:

https://tomlehrersongs.com/

https://tomlehrersongs.com/wernher-von-braun/

Animats•6mo ago
"Profits don't matter" only worked during the period of zero interest rates.

AMZN started to become profitable in 2021.[1] By 2023, it was very profitable. $17 billion in Q1 2025.

[1] https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/AMZN/amazon/net-in...

vineyardmike•6mo ago
Cable companies and other infrastructure companies have been focusing on free cash flow and revenue over profit for generations. Interest rates have fluctuated a lot in that time.

Amazon started to be very profitable because they couldn’t reinvest all that money into growing the business in a meaningful way. The timing aligning with when they stopped their Covid-buildout because sales behavior returned to in-store, they started scaling back the billions a year they wasted on Alexa, and started scaling back various moonshot ideas like Amazon Go stores.

jongjong•6mo ago
It's weird because revenue can easily be gamed. I could set up a shell company and quickly sell expensive goods back and forth between the two companies and achieve any revenue number I want. Profits are much harder to fake however, especially in the long run.
typs•6mo ago
This post tracks well with much analysis of some (emphasis some) AI companies in this particular audience.
pengaru•6mo ago
"Revenue solves all problems"
metabagel•6mo ago
Please update the title with "(2013)". This article was published on October 26, 2013.
RobotCaleb•6mo ago
Yeah, it's hardly worth reading anymore
JCM9•6mo ago
Amazon generates a ton of cash and the strategy of rolling that back into the business has, broadly, worked well. The challenge now as the company gets on in years is that there’s some bits making cash and a whole lot that’s not. That OK so long as the cash keeps coming in to subsidize things but if that changes things will get messy quickly. They’re clearly trying to start rationalizing that now, including with AWS where they’re starting to address some of the bloat there and lack of a coherent strategy at scale outside EC2, storage, and a few other core services.
Frieren•6mo ago
> They’re clearly trying to start rationalizing that now, including with AWS where they’re starting to address some of the bloat there and lack of a coherent strategy at scale outside EC2, storage, and a few other core services.

So, now that they have a defacto monopoly they will jack up prices and profit from companies being slow to move out. IBM did the same thing.

I_dream_of_Geni•6mo ago
Even though this article is seriously out of date, there is one thing missing in the analysis: Jeff Bezos was worth almost $30 billion in 2013, and is worth about $240 billion today. That money (value? worth?) comes from somewhere. So, yes, Amazon IS profitable (especially for Bezos)
jrflowers•6mo ago
That’s not what profit is
I_dream_of_Geni•6mo ago
I'm sure you are right. Bezos hasn't 'profited' from Amazon. I was making a different point.
SR2Z•6mo ago
I think you were deliberately being obtuse. Bezos' net worth is not realizable in full and what he does have is directly the result of Amazon being profitable as a business.
gnabgib•6mo ago
At the time (231 points, 2013, 137 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6620598

Previously (95 points, 2021, 105 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29661261