I was thinking of pursuing the difficult task of going through TAOCP cover to cover. Is it helpful in real life CS/software reasoning or is it just academic stimuli?
Comments
brudgers•2h ago
It is an amazing book by the standards of books in general.
That's a reasonable reason to read it.
It's at the foundation of computer science.
Thats a reasonable reason to read it.
It's really fucking challenging.
that's an adult reason to try to read it.
And the reason, people don't.
Good luck.
And because Knuth has been writing it for more than sixty years and because Knuth is almost certainly more expert than you and because TAOCP is full of things that Knuth found difficult it is unreasonable to expect to read it cover to cover for any adult definition of "read" in any reasonable amount of time.
hamiecod•38m ago
Are there any specific sections I should focus on reading? Or just see what seems interesting and go with that?
brudgers•2h ago
That's a reasonable reason to read it.
It's at the foundation of computer science.
Thats a reasonable reason to read it.
It's really fucking challenging.
that's an adult reason to try to read it.
And the reason, people don't.
Good luck.
And because Knuth has been writing it for more than sixty years and because Knuth is almost certainly more expert than you and because TAOCP is full of things that Knuth found difficult it is unreasonable to expect to read it cover to cover for any adult definition of "read" in any reasonable amount of time.
hamiecod•38m ago