frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

We Conquered the Whomp's Fortress Tower [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEDQcxz5MKc
1•nomilk•16m ago•0 comments

Replit goes rogue and deletes our entire database

https://twitter.com/jasonlk/status/1946069562723897802
4•arrowsmith•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Benchstreet – the benchmark for financial time series forecasting

https://github.com/puffinsoft/benchstreet
1•ColonelParrot•28m ago•0 comments

How we made ClickHouse log queries 99.5% faster with resource fingerprinting

https://signoz.io/blog/query-performance-improvement/
1•ankit01-oss•29m ago•0 comments

Customer guidance for SharePoint vulnerability CVE-2025-53770

https://msrc.microsoft.com/blog/2025/07/customer-guidance-for-sharepoint-vulnerability-cve-2025-53770/
1•redmug•32m ago•1 comments

Unreal Engine 5.6 Performance Highlights

https://www.tomlooman.com/unreal-engine-5-6-performance-highlights/
1•mariuz•40m ago•0 comments

AI groups spend to replace low-cost 'data labellers' with high-paid experts

https://www.ft.com/content/e17647f0-4c3b-49b4-a031-b56158bbb3b8
2•eisa01•40m ago•0 comments

A different perspective on prompt evaluation

https://pieces.app/blog/prompt-evaluation
1•Nik09•46m ago•0 comments

The Big LLM Architecture Comparison

https://magazine.sebastianraschka.com/p/the-big-llm-architecture-comparison
2•mdp2021•46m ago•0 comments

Roman Roads Research Association (UK)

https://www.romanroads.org/index.html
2•countrymile•59m ago•0 comments

Leak? Meta Superintelligence Team Organization Structure

https://haebom.dev/archive?post=5r398nmnry4qjmvwje7y
1•haebom•1h ago•3 comments

How I Spent Months Solving the Ruby's Most Annoying Gem Installation Problem

https://mensfeld.pl/2025/07/solving-ruby-rdkafka-installation-problem/
1•thunderbong•1h ago•0 comments

French Data Under U.S. Firms Is Not Protected from U.S. Government Access

https://pxlnv.com/linklog/us-cloud-act-access/
2•BallsInIt•1h ago•1 comments

Proxmox-GitOps: Recursive GitOps Environment for Container Automation in Proxmox

https://github.com/stevius10/Proxmox-GitOps
1•stevius•1h ago•1 comments

Mathematicians interact with AI, July 2025 update

https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=15039
1•mellosouls•1h ago•0 comments

In a year US computer science departments will find their enrollment at 50%

https://twitter.com/ShriramKMurthi/status/1946673777485529149
1•tosh•1h ago•0 comments

Async I/O on Linux in databases

https://blog.canoozie.net/async-i-o-on-linux-and-durability/
8•jtregunna•1h ago•2 comments

Tricaprin triggered a dramatic reversal of heart disease

https://scitechdaily.com/remarkable-results-scientists-say-this-supplement-reversed-heart-damage/
2•majkinetor•1h ago•0 comments

Scientists discover Pfizer Covid jab linked to major eye damage

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14915995/pfizer-covid-vaccine-eye-changes-damage-risk.html
1•wopwops•1h ago•1 comments

Evidence-Based Truth Claim Scale (0-100)

https://domofutu.substack.com/p/evidence-based-truth-claim-scale
1•benjacksondev•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: New Audiobook Generator for Nvidia Using Chatterbox TTS

https://github.com/cpttripzz/Chatterblez
2•beboplifa•1h ago•1 comments

Will the Fear of Being Confused for AI Mean That We Will Now Write Differently?

https://3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2025/06/will-the-fear-of-being-confused-for-ai-mean-that-we-will-now-write-differently.html
2•bryanrasmussen•1h ago•5 comments

Denmark card payment outage last night – Nets terminals down nationwide

https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/nedbrud-hos-nets-giver-store-problemer-med-kortbetalinger
3•khebbie•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: MCP server for Blender that builds 3D scenes via natural language

https://blender-mcp-psi.vercel.app/
1•prono•1h ago•0 comments

Mass Grave Complex identification and analysis at CECOT

https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/mass-grave-complex-mgc-identification-and-analysis-of-grave-site-candidates-gsc-1-2-at-cecot
3•bryanrasmussen•1h ago•1 comments

An Introduction to GPU Profiling and Optimization

https://www.bitsand.cloud/posts/profiling-gpus
11•danielklnstein•1h ago•0 comments

You can use GitHub from your Watch – GitWrist

https://github.com/DaytimeDev/GitWrist
1•daytimedev•1h ago•0 comments

Grandma Test

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Grandma%2520Test
1•1970-01-01•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Lit Component Snippets

https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=brysonbw.lit-component-snippets
1•Brysonbw•1h ago•0 comments

Precise Exceptions in Relaxed Architectures

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3695053.3731102
1•matt_d•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Airbnb allowed rampant price gouging following L.A. fires, city attorney alleges

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-07-19/airbnb-allowed-price-gouging-following-l-a-fires-city-attorney-alleges-in-lawsuit
40•miguelazo•4h ago

Comments

vouaobrasil•3h ago
The article doesn't make it clear whether it was AirBNB itself that increased prices, or whether it was hosts. And moreover, it also doesn't even give one example of a before and after price. I'd like to see at least one example.
legitster•3h ago
Host here. Almost nobody sets prices manually. You either use Airbnb's pricing algorithm, or one from a third party. Either way it's set automatically based on local occupancy rates/hotel prices/etc.

Which is an argument that this is not truly gouging - there's just a demand surge and a supply crunch and the market responds the same way as if it was a business conference in town.

Another thing worth pointing out is that the market of available Airbnbs clears out from the cheaper units first. So it may look like prices are shooting up, but really it's just that all the normal priced ones are gone.

csomar•2h ago
Is the price reflective of the market though? I just negotiated an airbnb outside of airbnb at 40% of the platform quoted price and it was not a deal either but the market price. Airbnb massively inflates prices for everyone to create an expectation of how much things cost.
dmkolobov•2h ago
This reminds me of the time my middle-school history teacher decided to bring in one of the student’s financial advisor parents to defend price-gouging on gas during Hurricane Katrina evacuation and subsequent exodus.

It was an unconvincing argument then, and is an unconvincing argument now.

Rebelgecko•1h ago
FWIW this is the most convincing argument I've seen for allowing prices to raise during an emergency: https://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2007/Mungergouging....

Second most convincing argument is people who hoarded toilet paper during COVID

caterama•1h ago
Is this a viable workaround… Charge $XX entry/membership fee for the opportunity to buy ice at the regular price?
Arainach•46m ago
>Second most convincing argument is people who hoarded toilet paper during COVID

That's not an argument for price gouging, it's an argument for rationing.

AuryGlenz•9m ago
That’s awfully hard to do well though, especially setting up a system quickly.

Sure, you can limit amount per customer per store. But then someone comes in with their husband and double dips, and then go back through in 10 minutes hitting different checkouts, or just go through self checkout, and then go to different stores…

All the toilet paper is still gone, encouraging fear in other people to do the same as the couple above.

The alternative would have been “you idiots are buying all the toilet paper? Fine. It’s 5x more expensive now.”

People then see that toilet paper is still in stores and prices can come down gradually but rapidly, and if people start being nervous again prices can quickly raise to stamp that out.

xboxnolifes•2h ago
Sounds less like price gouging and more like price fixing.
pentaphobe•2h ago
Yeah, funny how property markets always seem to have that same response.

I bet most of those same people would lose their minds if their favourite restaurant tried to double prices overnight. "Yeah we sold a lot of burgers yesterday..."

AlotOfReading•1h ago
I wonder how much "value" would actually be lost from the market if prices were simply fixed a month or two ahead of time to exclude those price shocks.
orangecat•1h ago
If a restaurant is so popular that they're often running out of food, it's perfectly reasonable for them to raise their prices.
hackable_sand•45m ago
Not during a famine
AuryGlenz•14m ago
I’d argue that’s a better time to do it? People will eat less, conserving food.
tbrownaw•2h ago
> Which is an argument that this is not truly gouging - there's just a demand surge and a supply crunch and the market responds the same way as if it was a business conference in town.

So then real price gouging is... what, when you charge more than everyone else (and drive all your customers away to competitors)?

hcnews•1h ago
> Almost nobody sets prices manually. You either use Airbnb's pricing algorithm, or one from a third party. Either way it's set automatically based on local occupancy rates/hotel prices/etc.

This seems pretty undesirable. Very easy for Airbnb/third party to increase prices even without demand just to increase their prices.

We recently saw a similar price fixing lawsuit for renters. Landlords, co-ordinating together, ended up increasing prices of Condos across major American cities (via means of a third party). The consumer ends up paying unnecessarily high prices in an inelastic market.

msgodel•1h ago
>Almost nobody sets prices manually.

Huh. I know a number of AirBNB hosts (the new kind that treat it like a business, not the old kind) and they all absolutely do model the market out months in advance and 100% manually set the prices.

austhrow743•16m ago
What definition of gouging are you using that conflicts with “there's just a demand surge and a supply crunch”?

“the market responds the same way as if it was a business conference in town.” Normal people definitely complain about that and use the word gouging when they do so.

fsckboy•2h ago
>The article doesn't make it clear

we don't need to know.

if airbnb raised the prices and the market isn't there, rental income will go down and vacancy rates will go up and airbnb will lower prices again.

if airbnb raised the prices and the market stayed strong, they'd raise the prices more.

the higher the prices go, the more people with extra space to rent out will take notice and clean up their garage, or go stay at grandma's or whatever, creating more housing out of thin air (actually, on the margin) helping alleviate the housing shortage.

the same pattern would happen if hosts raise the prices themselves. also, if all the cheap places get rented, the market will appear to have higher prices even if nothing has changed.

let markets figure out prices, period. that's what markets do, it's one of mankind's stellar achievments. It's why the west is successful and communism fails.

if airbnb has monopoly power and is manipulating prices, fix that problem any day of the week, don't use a massive fire that destroys housing as evidence of anything, it means nothing, that's normal market correction.

JackYoustra•1h ago
(while I think this isn't the affordability driver) this point about prices isn't really true - compare the graphs of two markets: one with a horizontal demand curve (perfect competition) and one with a downward-sloping demand curve (monopoly) - the first will have no deadweight loss, the second will have substantial deadweight loss.

Markets tend to the second and need state intervention in order to prevent the proliferation of monopolies. Functionally this is intervention every time price coordination happens, which... is pretty clearly what AirBNB is doing!

tsimionescu•56m ago
This is all economy 101, rational preference BS. The reality is that suppliers very often collude to increase prices universally (particularly for things like housing, where there is almsot a natural monopoly - you can't bring in more land to the same city), and buyers have no way of knowing or acting on this. Airbnb is perfect for organizing such collusion, acting as a virtual cartel.
diziet•2h ago
Airbnb claims it charges about 16% fee on top of the actual rental price. https://www.airbnb.com/resources/hosting-homes/a/how-much-do...
ipaddr•1h ago
Which is fair for what they do.
VarFarYonder•1h ago
Seems like basic supply and demand rather than something nefarious?

But I guess if we accepted that, nobody would be to blame.

BallsInIt•1h ago
https://www.caloes.ca.gov/office-of-the-director/policy-admi...
DragonStrength•55m ago
Thank you. This thread is full of people acting as though price gouging during emergencies hasn't been illegal since before the Internet.

Not a California thing either. Southern states have similar laws thanks to common natural disasters like hurricanes.

tropicalfruit•1h ago
calling the airbnb landlord a "host" and not instead a "parasite" :/
shlant•2m ago
so brave of you. Everyone is clapping
rcpt•1h ago
The fires burned in some of the wealthiest parts of the US. Dumping a ton of multimillionaires on the short term rental market will raise prices yes.
baron816•1h ago
The supply of housing is more elastic than you think. Some people have spare bedrooms, or second homes in LA. They may have previously chosen to leave them vacant, but for many people the higher rates they can get on Airbnb can entice them to list them. This happens at the margins—it’s not an all or nothing thing. So the higher people can earn renting out available space, the more they’ll be willing to rent. At some price point, even a billionaire will rent out their garage.
jedberg•1h ago
This happens to any platform using algorithmic pricing. Any time there is an unexpected event that either constrains supply or increases demand (or both), the algos go haywire. Then the the platform has to put in checks to prevent it from happening again.

Remember when Uber was new and the surge pricing could do 20X+ in just a few minutes when there was an emergency? And then they had to fix it so that wouldn't happen, the trade off being that there just weren't cars available.

The thing is, some people aren't price sensitive. In a sudden blizzard, some people are happy to pay $350 for a two mile ride home, just to get home. And some drivers are happy to go out in that weather for their piece of the $350.

The hard question is how do you find the balance?

Y_Y•15m ago
The sellers are definitely price-sensitive though. The choice isn't between a $350 trip and a $20 one (because demand far outstrips supply at the point), it's $350 or no deal, or at best a lottery ticket to see if you're one of the lucky 5% of people who can get a ride at the old price.

When the rate shoots up like this drivers will get a message, and plenty of them will get out of bed or stop whatever they're doing and get on the road. The platform will probably take a nice cut, but otherwise to meet demand they'd have to subsidise most of the difference. That would be some very expensive PR.

aurareturn•1h ago
Is it Airbnb that increased the price or hosts?

Regardless, I don't see any problem here. The price increases, more people with a spare apartment, home, or room will be incentivized to host which increases supply.

If you suppress the price artificially, then the supply won't increase which won't do people who lost their homes any favors.

MangoToupe•47m ago
> If you suppress the price artificially, then the supply won't increase which won't do people who lost their homes any favors.

Supply's not increasing substantially in the near future to help regardless. Folks place far too much faith in market effects that history has demonstrated again and again only take effect in the long term.

You know what would actually guarantee an increase in supply? Government-funded public housing. But that would deflate property prices, which is far more reprehensible to americans than the institutions of poverty and homelessness. We are a disgusting and reprehensible people.

shlant•3m ago
> You know what would actually guarantee an increase in supply? Government-funded public housing

Or just removing needless restrictions so the market can provide the incentive for private entities to build housing? The government is not the primary builder of housing, nor should it be.

sanp•46m ago
Isn’t the underlying assumption here that supply is essentially infinite (or at least comparable to demand)? I think is the underlying assumption with any such statement. If the assumption doesn’t hold true then I am not sure the statement holds true (perhaps only till there is some supply).
aurareturn•33m ago
No, that's not the assumption. The assumption is that higher prices will draw out more supplies. This is how a free market works.
whatever1•26m ago
Is anyone tracking these platforms? Today coincidentally I got a Lyft from the airport to home and due to traffic it would take 1 hour, the price asked was $125. Ok steep, but the poor driver would be stuck with me for an hour.

BUT NO! I asked the driver and at the end of the trip he kindly showed me how much Lyft gave him.

$62 before tip.

sschueller•9m ago
AirBnB is also listed in the UN special rappoteur report [1] as profiteering from the Palestinian occupied territory. Israeli settlers are able to rent out their homes that are on UN recognized occupied territory violating international law.

Per international law the executives of these companies are supposed to be prosecuted by the countries they are operating out of. Even if the US does nothing, the tide is turning and these executives may face arrest when stepping into another country.

[1] https://www.un.org/unispal/document/a-hrc-59-23-from-economy...