frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Open in hackernews

Why Some Satellites Use NetBSD?

https://machaddr.substack.com/p/why-some-satellites-use-netbsd
14•Bogdanp•5h ago

Comments

posix86•2h ago
Why so many articles have grammatically incorrect headlines?
AndrewDucker•2h ago
Because many writers are writing in their second language, and sometimes they use language structures from their native language.
netsharc•2h ago
Author is Portuguese, that rule is the same in Portuguese.
posix86•15m ago
I'm second language too, so I checked the article, and it seems fine otherwise apart from the title; I'd expect the title to get extra care. Anyway it's flagged anyway.
NitpickLawyer•2h ago
This post could have been a prompt. It is 1000% generated with an LLM.

Tell-tale signs: fluffs up the "key features for x". Each feature follows bold title, highly generic explanation of the title. Then it lists some examples, all following the same pattern "why x".

Then the conclusion is full of gpt-isms. Doesn't say anything of value, just re-iterates fluff words.

> NetBSD's presence in space demonstrates how a well-designed, community-supported operating system can play a pivotal role in advancing space exploration and technology. As satellite missions grow more ambitious, NetBSD’s adaptability ensures it will remain a key player in the evolving field of aerospace engineering.

I know there's a policy encouraging users not to cry "llm generated" every time, but this is quite egregious.

ygritte•2h ago
> there's a policy encouraging users not to cry "llm generated"

There is? If so, it should be reversed and LLM-generated crap should be banned.

elcritch•2h ago
Eh I found the article interesting. To me it seems more like a non-native English speaker using an LLM to help their English grammar.

The article lists out some examples which I found interesting and didn't know about. I tried getting Gemini to reproduce them but it just gave general examples. Now without those examples it'd be a boring listicle.

Also I haven't seen an LLM spit out a classic sentence like: "This text explores the reasons behind its adoption and how it powers these satellites."

netsharc•2h ago
I skimmed through it, yeah, such a pathetic article. It's like having the title "Why satellites use carbon fibre (question mark because of illiteracy)" and having the text be too many words that's just repetitions of "Because it's lightweight and strong"...

At least give us some history about who decided on NetBSD, when, and why they picked it without the generic blah blah.

yard2010•2h ago
It's quite funny how "pass a Turing test" is something that changes over time.
elcritch•2h ago
I really want an excuse to run NetBSD on something. I wonder if ESP32's are capable of running NetBSD? Even just running on a RPi would be fun.

Also, for embedded devices the coherent whole system design of *BSDs with the package builder seems like it'd be much nicer than BuildRoot or Yocto.

I've come to very much dislike trying to keep Linux images for embedded stuff running over years. Perhaps it's because Linux claims not pride itself on "not breaking userspace" but seems to add a new GPIO sub-system every 5 years. Ain't nobody got time for that.

sunshine-o•2h ago
> I wonder if ESP32's are capable of running NetBSD?

Interesting question but can't find much about it [0]

I guess for the most recent ESP32 it will be under RISC-V.

People have been able to boot Linux on them for a while so why not...

- [0] https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/

elcritch•1h ago
It’d probably depend on whether NetBSD requires having an MMU or MPU.

RISC-V support might be an option.