> The via negativa part of this, removing language related to misinformation, Diversity, DEI and climate change and leaving things neutral, seems good.
I appreciate that the author then goes on to list a bunch of bad things about this and then convinces himself that it will all actually be fine because, dunno, it fits his prejudices? Biden did something something?
Everyday I realize just how true the adage about not being able to logic someone out of a position they didn't use logic to get into.
wredcoll•9h ago
> Ideological Neutrality. LLMs shall be neutral, nonpartisan tools that do not manipulate responses in favor of ideological dogmas such as DEI. Developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments into an LLM’s outputs unless those judgments are prompted by or otherwise readily accessible to the end user.
> I worry that the White House has not thought through the implications of (b) here.
Yeah... "worry" is a word here.
Like, people's willingness to have faith in someone that continually betrays them genuinely baffles me.
wredcoll•9h ago
I appreciate that the author then goes on to list a bunch of bad things about this and then convinces himself that it will all actually be fine because, dunno, it fits his prejudices? Biden did something something?
Everyday I realize just how true the adage about not being able to logic someone out of a position they didn't use logic to get into.
wredcoll•9h ago
> I worry that the White House has not thought through the implications of (b) here.
Yeah... "worry" is a word here.
Like, people's willingness to have faith in someone that continually betrays them genuinely baffles me.