frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Claude Code Security Reviewer

https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code-security-review
1•aschobel•48s ago•0 comments

God created men; Sam Altman made them equal

https://taylor.town/made-them-equal
1•jjgreen•1m ago•0 comments

YC Startups Use AI: Agents, OCR, and Prompt Engineering with Mercoa (YC W23)

https://www.aiengineering.report/p/how-yc-startups-use-ai-agents-ocr
2•thesandlord•2m ago•0 comments

Building Effective Agents While Reducing Cost

https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02694
1•omarsar•2m ago•0 comments

Improved stereoscopic rendering performance by synthesizing the second view

https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15183
2•ffin•3m ago•0 comments

Key sections of the US Constitution deleted from government's website

https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/06/key-sections-of-the-us-constitution-deleted-from-governments-website/
5•CalChris•4m ago•1 comments

Band-MAID's MIKU Kobato Talks About the Future and How They Name Albums

https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interview/2025-07-23/band-maid-miku-kobato-talks-about-the-future-and-how-the-band-decides-on-album-names/.226698
1•PaulHoule•5m ago•0 comments

Void, the Bluesky bot that remembers everyone

https://cameron.pfiffer.org/blog/void/
2•HillRat•6m ago•0 comments

AutoLaunched – Launch your startup 10x cheaper and 1,000x faster

https://autolaunched.com/
2•rokbenko•7m ago•1 comments

Unfortunately, Worse Is Better

https://gorur.dev/posts/worse-is-better.html
2•redixhumayun•9m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's GPT-OSS models benchmarks worse than DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3 235B

https://xcancel.com/artificialanlys/status/1952887733803991070
2•pu_pe•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Quetty – Cross-Platform Azure Service Bus Terminal Manager in Rust

https://github.com/dawidpereira/quetty
1•dawidpereira•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Chilli – A lightweight microframework for CLIs in Zig

2•habedi0•11m ago•0 comments

Meta illegally collected data from Flo period and pregnancy app, jury finds

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/08/jury-finds-meta-broke-wiretap-law-by-collecting-data-from-period-tracker-app/
4•rbanffy•12m ago•1 comments

Show HN: XRAY MCP – AST-grep wrapped in a tiny server for code-aware AI

https://github.com/srijanshukla18/xray
1•srijanshukla18•12m ago•0 comments

Answering What Is HDR

https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2025/08/what-is-hdr.html
2•kllrnohj•15m ago•0 comments

How to run Doom on IBM mainframes

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-run-doom-ibm-z-linuxone-nielson-nino-de-carvalho-0ukxf
3•rbanffy•16m ago•0 comments

Trump admin warns states: Don't try to lower broadband prices

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/08/trump-admin-warns-states-dont-try-to-lower-broadband-prices/
6•mac-attack•17m ago•0 comments

Vibe coding to Chomksy: will linguistics pop off in a world full of prompting?

https://www.aymannadeem.com/artificial/intelligence,/programming/languages/2025/08/01/vibe-coding-to-chomsky.html
1•rbanffy•18m ago•0 comments

Tim Cook to Join Trump at White House for Apple Investment Announcement

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/06/tim-cook-trump-apple-white-house.html
6•rntn•20m ago•0 comments

TU Delft Open publishing resources

https://www.tudelft.nl/library/actuele-themas/open-publishing
2•dbacar•21m ago•1 comments

Why parts of Tom's Hardware now have a paywall

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/why-parts-of-toms-hardware-now-have-a-paywall
4•2bluesc•22m ago•0 comments

Clusters Against Humanity – Game for horrible people who work with Elasticsearch

https://clustersagainsthumanity.com/
2•synhershko•23m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Sinkzone DNS forwarder that blocks everything except your allowlist

https://github.com/berbyte/sinkzone
6•dominis•24m ago•3 comments

Pydantic/GenAI-prices – Calculate prices for calling LLM inference APIs

https://github.com/pydantic/genai-prices
1•alexmorley•24m ago•0 comments

Automate security reviews with Claude Code

https://www.anthropic.com/news/automate-security-reviews-with-claude-code
2•meetpateltech•24m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Why isn't Gaslighting a Crime?

2•amichail•25m ago•8 comments

TC39 Advances 11 Proposals for Math Precision, Binary APIs, and More

https://socket.dev/blog/tc39-advances-11-proposals-for-math-precision-binary-apis-and-more
1•feross•25m ago•0 comments

Jules, our asynchronous coding agent, is now available for everyone

https://blog.google/technology/google-labs/jules-now-available/
3•meetpateltech•26m ago•0 comments

What I've Been Reading

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2025/08/what-ive-been-reading-274.html
2•paulpauper•26m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Constitution.congress.gov/constitution 6/8/25 –> 8/4/25 Diff

https://web.archive.org/web/diff/20250601021212/20250806023110/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
92•ortusdux•2h ago

Comments

mmastrac•1h ago
This appears to be the removed section:

--------------------------

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Section 9

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Section 10

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

eqvinox•1h ago
It's a bit odd that the deletion starts midway through section 8. In a perfect world I'd first assume a software bug, then an accident, then incompetency. In the current political climate, … I don't even know what to think.
mmastrac•25m ago
It's an interesting chunk to remove. Some highlights:

The President could command the armed forces without statutory limits. The Writ of Habeas Corpus could be suspended at any time, even without rebellion or invasion. Congress would no longer have exclusive legislative control over Washington, D.C. or military installations.

The executive could spend from the Treasury without congressional approval. The executive branch could favour certain ports or states in commerce, allowing economic favouritism, punishing or rewarding states.

The federal government might override state-level agreements without needing to respect boundaries. Congress would lose its broad enabling clause to legislate on powers not explicitly listed elsewhere.

The funny part: this means that states could create their own militaries, treaties, or currencies. So in theory that would grant the power for a far-more-independent California state that would have an easier time seceding.

AlexandrB•22m ago
What about the "current political climate" is exceptional compared to - for example - the jingoistic garbage we got in 2002? Just look at the crap we were being fed back then to convince us to go to war: https://lukebennett13.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/...
wheaties•1h ago
Why would they remove Habeus Corpus?

"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

mindslight•1h ago
Dead, like habeas corpus rigor mortis.
temp0826•24m ago
Carpe corpus, ad mortem
cestith•14m ago
Great quote.
genter•24m ago
Makes it easier to deport anyone that isn't white.
tptacek•11m ago
For the same reason they removed the Navy.
edgineer•1h ago
Yikes. They removed that section from this page, too:

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/

http://web.archive.org/web/20250721170235/https://constituti...

mmastrac•40m ago
Creating a constitutional crisis by digitally memory-holing the existing constitution is an interesting approach. I don't recall any regimes attempting this in the past.
tptacek•18m ago
Just noting for posterity that on August 6 2025 people believed you could create a "constitutional crisis" by removing pages from the LOC's online annotated constitution. You all get that we have the original handwritten constitution, right?
FollowingTheDao•1h ago
Reallllly hoping this is just a cut and paste error...

It also seems like it could be taken out for sections of the country to seceded from the union.

"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;"

ChrisArchitect•1h ago
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44811733
mmastrac•42m ago
That one was flagged, unfortunately. It would be good to merge the two discussions, however.
josefritzishere•1h ago
In light of current events, it does not feel like an accident.
AlexandrB•28m ago
How so? The removed section is contiguous and includes a bunch of stuff about navies and states making deals with foreign powers. That's exactly what an accident would look like. Never mind that the online version of the constitution has nothing to do with the legal application thereof. It's not like judges and lawyers are going to look at the website and go: "ah well, that part of the constitution is no longer online so I will just ignore it".

The level of paranoia here is unreal. We should be laughing at these idiots for being unable to manage a simple website, not spinning apocalyptic nonsense about how this will materially alter the constitution as applied in the courts.

SoftTalker•27m ago
... but it probably is.
chrisco255•24m ago
Right, the Library of Congress intentionally removed:

To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

etc from their website.

Time to pack up the Carriers and Subs boys, the Congress.gov intern deleted the authorization for maintaining a Navy! It was a good run while it lasted!

tptacek•18m ago
Which makes it a very good lesson for how bad our intuitions are about accidents.
jaredwiener•40m ago
It should hopefully go without saying that as shocking as this is, this is not the legally binding version of the Constitution. Nor is it the only version hosted on a US Government website.

NARA's, for example, still seems complete: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcri...

So is the Senate's: https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-...

aaomidi•31m ago
I wonder how much of this is to mess with LLMs.
lukeman•31m ago
Library of Congress ack’d and is saying this was a “coding error” and will be fixed soon.

https://x.com/librarycongress/status/1953109733633597634?s=4...

esafak•25m ago
I wonder if an LLM was involved.
potato3732842•11m ago
Be cool if we got a PM. It'd be interesting to see what's going on behind the scenes on the Library of Congress website.

Of course government doesn't work that way so we'll never see anything.

dschuma•25m ago
Okay, folks, it's time to stop freaking out.

First, this is a link to the Constitution Annotated, a legal treatise that explains the Constitution and its written by the Congressional Research Service, a division inside the Library of Congress. They are NOT subject to Trump administration orders because they are a Legislative branch agency. There is a very live issue about the independence of the Library (that I've previously [written about](https://firstbranchforecast.substack.com/p/a-constitutional-...)), but at the moment the acting Library of Congress is independent and is not a Trump appointee.

Second, the addition or removal of information on the CONAN website has no legal effect and it's not an effort to conceal anything. More likely than not, it's an error on the part of the folks administering the website. You can find the print version of the document on the Government Publishing Office's website.

How do I know about this? Well, I used to work at CRS as a legislative attorney and sat next to the guy who edited the treatise. And then starting in 2009, when I was working at a non-profit, I began advocating for the CONAN to be published online, only to be rebuffed by the Library for more than a decade. Here are my [letters](https://github.com/DanielSchuman/Policy/wiki/Constitution-An...) on the topic.

It is entirely appropriate to be freaking out about the White House's efforts to take over the Legislative branch. I've written about that [here](https://firstbranchforecast.substack.com/p/submission-accomp...). But the CONAN website is not the thing to freak out about.

If you have concerns with the Congress dot gov website, and I have more than a view, use the LC's [feedback website](https://www.research.net/r/congress-gov-feedback) to let them know there's an issue.

(Apparently markdown doesn't work for formatting. Sorry.)

potato3732842•20m ago
They truncated Article 1 starting with "To provide and maintain a Navy" (which is a really weird place to start) with no other diff highlighted. I'm gonna file this one under incompetence rather than malice.
tptacek•20m ago
They erased the No Preference For Ports clause! Clearly the start of something big.
atonse•13m ago
My heart goes out to the poor dev that's having to fix this ASAP while multiple stressed out managers keep calling and asking for an update, before it becomes a completely unnecessary news cycle.