frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
1•tablets•2m ago•0 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
1•breve•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•6m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
1•pastage•6m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
1•billiob•7m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
1•birdculture•13m ago•0 comments

Go 1.22, SQLite, and Next.js: The "Boring" Back End

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/go-next-pt-2
1•mohammede•18m ago•0 comments

Laibach the Whistleblowers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mx2mxpaCY
1•KnuthIsGod•20m ago•1 comments

Slop News - HN front page right now hallucinated as 100% AI SLOP

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•24m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•26m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
2•tosh•32m ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
3•oxxoxoxooo•36m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•36m ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
2•goranmoomin•40m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

3•throwaw12•41m ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
2•senekor•43m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Latest Platform Targets Enterprise Customers

https://aibusiness.com/agentic-ai/openai-s-latest-platform-targets-enterprise-customers
1•myk-e•45m ago•0 comments

Goldman Sachs taps Anthropic's Claude to automate accounting, compliance roles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/anthropic-goldman-sachs-ai-model-accounting.html
3•myk-e•48m ago•5 comments

Ai.com bought by Crypto.com founder for $70M in biggest-ever website name deal

https://www.ft.com/content/83488628-8dfd-4060-a7b0-71b1bb012785
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•49m ago•1 comments

Big Tech's AI Push Is Costing More Than the Moon Landing

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-spending-tech-companies-compared-02b90046
4•1vuio0pswjnm7•51m ago•0 comments

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/
2•1vuio0pswjnm7•53m ago•0 comments

Suno, AI Music, and the Bad Future [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8dcFhF0Dlk
1•askl•54m ago•2 comments

Ask HN: How are researchers using AlphaFold in 2026?

1•jocho12•57m ago•0 comments

Running the "Reflections on Trusting Trust" Compiler

https://spawn-queue.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3786614
1•devooops•1h ago•0 comments

Watermark API – $0.01/image, 10x cheaper than Cloudinary

https://api-production-caa8.up.railway.app/docs
1•lembergs•1h ago•1 comments

Now send your marketing campaigns directly from ChatGPT

https://www.mail-o-mail.com/
1•avallark•1h ago•1 comments

Queueing Theory v2: DORA metrics, queue-of-queues, chi-alpha-beta-sigma notation

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/queueing-theory
1•jph•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Hibana – choreography-first protocol safety for Rust

https://hibanaworks.dev/
5•o8vm•1h ago•1 comments

Haniri: A live autonomous world where AI agents survive or collapse

https://www.haniri.com
1•donangrey•1h ago•1 comments

GPT-5.3-Codex System Card [pdf]

https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/23eca107-a9b1-4d2c-b156-7deb4fbc697c/GPT-5-3-Codex-System-Card-02.pdf
1•tosh•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Congress Just Deleted Habeas Corpus from the Constitution on Its Website

https://abovethelaw.com/2025/08/congress-just-deleted-habeas-corpus-from-the-constitution-on-its-website/
58•akudha•6mo ago

Comments

Alupis•6mo ago
> Because the sketchy sedition hobbyists are the ones running Congress now.

Yeah, ok...

A website obviously isn't the Constitution nor the law.

Dumb, over-sensationalized, rage-baiting hit piece. Move along...

mlhpdx•6mo ago
Maybe. Or maybe it does signal intent. Either way it’s a valid reaction to a stupid edit.
Alupis•6mo ago
This article is attempting to read into something that is much more likely nothing... some intern clicked the wrong button or whatever.

Again, the website has zero impact on the law. It literally doesn't matter.

mason_mpls•6mo ago
Is there a delete habeas corpus button? The specific search the current administration happens to be hitting legal challenges on?
slowmovintarget•6mo ago
All of this heavy breathing leaves out that the edit also deletes the U.S. Navy, I mean, if it had any legally binding impact, which thankfully, a website does not.
throwanem•6mo ago
I've heard ideas I liked less. Let's give the damned airedales back to the Army while we're at it, hey? Buncha fancified cavalry-wannabe jagoffs, they've had swelled heads for fifty years.
mason_mpls•6mo ago
“Legally Binding” is determined by the courts. The process of overturning sections of the constitution start with claiming they were never there.

The current admin spent months saying the 14th amendment essentially isn’t valid, so they could justify it to their base once they got SCOTUS to overturn birthright citizenship, despite it being plainly enumerated in the 14th amendment.

raverbashing•6mo ago
Yes because it's fun to take legal texts and change them in interesting ways and post them to authoritative sites

"It's just a prank bro"

lwansbrough•6mo ago
Yeah why would an administration that is doing mass illegal deportations without due process want to remove freely available information on Habeas Corpus from their websites?

Clearly dumb and very sensationalized! Nothing to see here!

Alupis•6mo ago
Because it's not published in a million other places? Because it's now officially not the law because it's not on this one particular website?

Come on people... you're being rage-baited to hell.

lwansbrough•6mo ago
You keep harping on the point that the laws haven't changed. Nobody is arguing that. But how would the average person access the text of the constitution?

Should they not expect to find the full text on the official government website for the constitution?

If I search "US constitution" and congress.gov is the first result, am I dumb for reading that source and believing that is the full text?

If I am detained illegally by ICE and I try to inform myself of my constitutional rights through the official government channels, and am not informed of my right to due process, have I been successfully ragebaited?

Alupis•6mo ago
> But how would the average person access the text of the constitution?

Right, because the average person googles the constitution right away when they are arrested?

What are you going to do with this googled info? Show it to the officer and get released? What reality is this even?

Nothing on this website changes anything... so yes, you are being very successfully rage baited, to the literal max. Just look how outraged over nothing you are... getting all worked up over a website on a Wednesday afternoon. You'll probably stew on this all day, even complain to others about it.

Rage baited, indeed.

lwansbrough•6mo ago
Lol this guy thinks ICE detainees are getting lawyers
Alupis•6mo ago
So please explain for us, how googling this information from one particular website changes your fictitious scenario with ICE detainees?
throwanem•6mo ago
Lol this guy thinks the executive has bothered pretending we had a functioning legislature since about March
jmye•6mo ago
> You'll probably stew on this all day, even complain to others about it.

Grow up.

slowmovintarget•6mo ago
The local Library...

Cornell University's annotated Constitution website...

A physical copy in their personal set of books...

And yes you've been successfully rage-baited, as the site problems were over an hour ago. All the text and missing commentary is back up. From the site: "The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."

Alupis•6mo ago
I can hear the face-palming now...
khazhoux•6mo ago
Obviously this has no legal bearing.

The question is why was this removed?

If a simple accident then this is a non-story.

If deliberate, then we must understand what was the chain of command and the motivation for deleting references to habeas corpus on this government website.

pesus•6mo ago
And it's an administration that has a history of trying to rewrite history and deny reality when it conflicts with their goals. And regularly claims fundamental parts of the constitution are "unconstitutional" somehow and are actively trying to get rid of them.
xdennis•6mo ago
> doing mass illegal deportations without due process

I think it's wrong to overreact to what Trump is doing and label things you don't like as "lacking due process" because when he does do something illegal you'll be like the boy who cried wolf.

Trump is following the law on immigration but many people think otherwise because of media misinformation. Take the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He had his due process and a judge ordered his removal in 2019. He also received "withholding of removal" from being sent home to El Salvador. The administration made a mistake in deporting him there, but they are ordered to deport him.

Many of the people you see in the news also had their day in court.

But media is also spreading misinformation on arrests. ICE doesn't need warrants to arrest people. This has always been the case. They can also arrest anyone (citizen or not) who commits an illegal act in their presence.

It's okay to not like what Trump is doing, but you should protest to change the law, not deny reality.

Also, I'm surprised you're using "illegal" instead of "undocumented".

Volundr•6mo ago
Your skipping over a lot here. Like the fact that Garcia wasn't just "sent home" he was sent to prison. Along with 220 other men, at least 200 of which had no criminal records, and at least 50 of which entered the country legally. Against a judges orders.
nerdjon•6mo ago
Under normal circumstances I could more easily give the benefit of the doubt on this, but the reality is we are not living in any amount of normalcy as far as this administration is concerned.

Of course removing this does not change the law, but this is still an official place for people to view these documents.

Could it have just been someone making an honest mistake? Yeah of course.

Has this administration already been deleting other important information from government websites and this could have been on purpose? Also yes.

roughly•6mo ago
I get the feeling you're one of the people who's going to be telling me I'm overreacting while we sit shackled together on a bus to Guatemala, where surely there are lawyers waiting for us.
panarchy•6mo ago
"You should be grateful we're getting a free vacation to a nice country with lovely weather. Do you libs ever stop complaining?" /s
roughly•6mo ago
"Technically this isn't illegal, because we've got an extradition treaty with Guatemala, and the court said Trump needed to show evidence in a trial before flying people out, but we're on a bus, not a plane, so really this isn't violating any laws, so it's hard to really call this executive overreach.

Also, there's no law specifically saying the court trial needs to be in an American court room, plus the ICE-built adjunct to the Guatemalan embassy is technically American territory, and the local immigration judge was officially appointed by Congress in a secret session to protect his identity, and of course you can't let media in the room for a closed session. None of this is actually illegal, so I don't know why you're being so hyperbolic."

ortusdux•6mo ago
See also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44812375
throwanem•6mo ago
Flagged because it is obviously an error since corrected, because this is not an authoritative source nor meant to be one on the text of the Constitution as the fundamental law of the United States, and primarily because if these are the kinds of tea leaves you feel the need to invent in 2025, you are better off talking seriously with a professional about your anxiety disorder, because the republic is really in far worse shape than to find leisure for such comedy would suggest you understand.
mason_mpls•6mo ago
How does an error that specific happen on accident?
throwanem•6mo ago
Trivially, of course. To purport otherwise as this author has leads me to think, not remotely for the first time lately, that people would be wiser more often to heed labels saying things like "take with food" and "do not operate heavy machinery." (This last is a stretch, I grant you, but I've seen what folks in their 20s call upper body strength these days, and any mechanical keyboard with a steel baseplate likely now qualifies.)

I anticipate with mild annoyance your like insistence on calling my claim, that this is an example basically of a US government employee half-assing a job that sucks and they hate, a "conspiracy theory." It isn't, of course. It's just that I understand what to be afraid of and you don't, so you're constantly terrified and incapable to reacting to any development other than as a kicked dog, and I'm Wittgenstein's lion. Oh, not for the sake of the damned mangy cat! But there's nothing I can say that you are able to understand, not at the moment at least.

You're way too scared for today and not nearly enough for half a decade from now, when we'll all be wishing we had made the most of this time while we had it. You could do better, but you probably won't, because even right now you're wasting the same time being angry at me for tossing off a read like this.

mason_mpls•6mo ago
your prompt could use some tuning
throwanem•6mo ago
Thank you! :smile: Can you recommend any specific enhancements or changes that might improve my next response? :student:
mariusor•6mo ago
> Trivially, of course

But how though?

That's supposed to be a static piece of text. Nobody should be required to do work on it, nobody should have access to work on it, unless the actual constitution changes.

throwanem•6mo ago
How the hell am I supposed to know? It's never been my job to redesign, maintain, or otherwise care about that website, thank goodness. Presumably their CMS sucks in one or more of the same ways as any other.
mariusor•6mo ago
Again, that's a static piece of text, no CMS needed. I'm all for not attributing to malice what can be equally explained by incompetence, but it's been many administrations in charge of this website and somehow it never happened before. I'd say that some eyebrows need to be raised.
throwanem•6mo ago
Five out of 46 administrations is "many?" But sure, I can see that you'd feel that way. I'm just saying it's a really silly thing to feel that way about, versus the many much better reasons for similar trepidation you imagine yourself escaping by avoiding the news.
jmye•6mo ago
“Caring about things is dumb” is such a lame response to “at least thirty years of government didn’t fuck this up, so why is this one so incompetent that it did.”

The language you use to dismiss the concern is certainly cute, but maybe put down the thesaurus for a bit. It’s not doing you the favor you think it is.

throwanem•6mo ago
Who said caring about things is dumb? I'm saying it's pointless and unhealthy to make a big deal out of this nonsense, which is totally irrelevant to the ongoing destruction of the republic and concurrent real collapse of American hegemony throughout the world. That is a big deal. This is chickenshit.

The Constitution is not being curtailed by mere edits to a website, and only a child could imagine otherwise. But if you think I'm being an asshole about it, you can say so without the circumlocution.

sparrish•6mo ago
It wasn't that 'specific'. The part left out started in the middle of section 8 with "To provide and maintain a Navy;"

Do you think the current administration is wanting to remove its ability to provide and maintain a Navy?

Looks like a simple copy/paste error to me.

Havoc•6mo ago
Sure seems like preparation. Having multiple versions of it floating around creates ambiguity and chaos

As a certain someone is fond of saying

FAKE NEWS

puppycodes•6mo ago
good conspiracy theory fodder but occam's razor says just a dumb mistake.

ironically this would be a great way to draw attention to the missing section rather than bury it.