It’s designed to avoid inflation, exclusion, and market closure by structuring value around verifiable action and shared trust, not speculation.
There are no gatekeepers. No centralized evaluation. No fixed market limits.
All definitions, structural proofs, and implementation principles are open on GitHub:
GitHub: https://github.com/contribution-protocol/contribution-protocol-project
We welcome feedback from engineers, economists, and anyone interested in post-capitalist design.
This structure is already in use in a local community. Do you think local currencies might hold more promise than cryptocurrencies?
sunscream89•6mo ago
I have long dreamed of how exactly all this could be of useful utility to real people and real places and real [community of] things.
I don’t know everything you have going on here, though I like what I see so far.
I have wished for similar ideas around functional communities who actually still have brick and mortar terminal interests. It’s a big leap these communities going digital, however the economies they generate within themselves could have long term “share cooperative” value.
It could be like a currency with a running exchange (cash and carry) however what it is in one part (token) a value share, and in another (non fungible) like a voting right (contributor.)
Anyways, yes, local value systems that aren’t public blockchain have a place in the world.
mzk_pi•6mo ago
Please also see the discussion^^ https://github.com/contribution-protocol/contribution-protoc...