2025 is the year of the terminal, apparently?
For my prototype purposes, it’s great, and Claude code the most fun I’ve had with tech in a jillion years.
Sure, you can have your LLM code with any JavaScript framework you want, as long as you don't mind it randomly dropping React code and React-isms in the middle of your app.
https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1mk8ks5/discussion_...
https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/llm-gateway#l...
is there a way to make it more verbose?
https://agent.md [redirect -> https://ampcode.com/AGENT.md] https://agent-rules.org
they also suggest using symlinks for now
Claude Code likes to add "attribution" in commit messages, which is just pure spam.
The whole agentic coding via CLI experience could be much improved by:
- Making it easy to see what command I last issued, without having to scroll up through reams of output hunting for context - Making it easy to spin up a proper sandbox to run sessions unattended - Etc.
Maybe for code generation, what we actually need is a code generator that is itself deterministic but uses AI, instead of AI that does code generation.
Till then you can also use symlinks
there are issues opened in some repos for this
- Support "AGENT.md" spec + filename · Issue #4970 · google-gemini/gemini-cli
https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli/issues/4970#issu...
Why are we purposely creating CLI dialects?
Yesterday, I was writing about a way I found to pass the same guideline documents into Claude, Gemini, and Aider CLI-coders: https://github.com/sutt/agro/blob/master/docs/case-studies/a...
I guess having links to supplementary rules files is an option, but I'm not sure which agents (if any) would work well with that.
I guess Cursor makes sense for people who only use LLMs for coding.
I pay for Cursor and ChatGPT. I can imagine I’d pay for Gemini if I used an android. The chat bots (1) won’t keep the subscription competitive with APIs because the cost and usage models are different and (2) most chat bots today are more of a UX competition than model quality. And the only winners are ChatGPT and whatever integrated options the user has by default (Gemini, MSFT Copilot, etc).
unsupp0rted•2h ago
sblawrie•2h ago
zaphirplane•2h ago
jstummbillig•2h ago
jonplackett•1h ago
jstummbillig•1h ago
anthonypasq•1h ago
bangaladore•1h ago
With the benefit that you can also pull in people who don't like using VSCode such as people who use Jetbrains or terminal based code editors.
gorjusborg•1h ago
The IDE/editor is for me, the agent doesn't need it. That also means I am not forced to used whatever imperfect forked IDE the agent is implemented against.
worldsayshi•1h ago
Because the agents aren't yet good enough for a hands off experience. You have to continuously monitor what it does if you want a passable code base.
tsvetkov•1h ago
stavros•1h ago
Xenoamorphous•1h ago
stavros•14m ago
Programming has changed from writing code to reviewing/QAing and reprompting, but the tooling hasn't yet caught up with that workflow. We need Gerrit for coding agents, basically.