And this version combining the graphic and the sound used to make the graphic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abapFJN6glo
And this alternative version (h/t @Kye): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpMrTxMV6E4
https://www.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/c...
Most are older and don't want to spend the obscene prices for satellite, cellular signal isn't good enough out there.
(I haven't personally had dial up in about 20 tears.)
Sites that work well with lynx are OK on dial up.
I literally cannot imagine 56K on the modern web.
Comcast and/or Century Link would be willing to set the neighborhood up, for a pretty sizable fee.
(Sorry to slightly hijack the thread. It's been an ongoing debate on HN)
Traditional server-rendered HTML should be orders of magnitude faster than most SPA bundles though.
I'm talking about long-lived apps where work is being accomplished. An SPA allows downloading and caching al or most of the frontend, then further communication can proceed using minimal bandwidth as the user works.
With traditional SSR, every page/form the user navigates to requires downloading all markup, styles, and client-side behaviors for that route.
Or a terminal UI, since that usually worked well back when dial-up was common.
I wonder if AOL will stop charging people on dial-up only, or if they will later claim "oops, sorry..."
Sounds like everyone keeps getting charged, since this is technically part of their "AOL plan", whatever that actually includes.
And a video version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpMrTxMV6E4
They had some pretty unscrupulous business practices back in the day with their free trial CD mailers. My cousin worked in their call center ages ago and would sometimes convince even people who didn't have a computer to pay for the service.
weeeeeeeeeee
kzzzzzzzzzzz
I was always kind of jealous of my friends who had AOL because I wanted the "You've Got Mail!" greeting, and I would see promotions that talk about "AOL Keywords" and I couldn't use those with Prodigy.
Amazing to think that AOL still offered dial-up service.
Not that I'm really complaining. I do like what we got.
And curiously different from the AI revolution, where there are no pretensions of idealism at at all, and everyone clearly understands that whoever wins this time will quite literally own the entire world, if the plan succeeds. And that it won't be a pleasant or pretty world for the rest of us, and that all of the leading candidates for King of the Universe don't care at all that the rest of us will be discarded. The complete opposite, in that regard.
I shall have to break out my set of AOL CD drink coasters, and put songs from Camelot on permanent repeat in order to mark the passing of an age with the solemnity it deserves.
loose-cannon•4h ago
derwiki•3h ago
benchly•3h ago
BobbyTables2•3h ago
donio•3h ago
sugarpimpdorsey•3h ago
smelendez•3h ago
philistine•3h ago
Or as worse I guess.
tonetegeatinst•2h ago
blcArmadillo•2h ago
grishka•3h ago
wtallis•2h ago
duskwuff•3h ago
A Google SERP with rich content: about 20 minutes
A typical Facebook post: ten minutes
CNN home page: half an hour
YouTube: forget it
dylan604•25m ago
bawolff•2h ago
But im pretty sure the answer is really damn slow.