How do you think about remote configurability?

Stuff like a lot of this needing to be A/B tested, models hot swapped, and versioned in a way thats accessible to non technical people?

How do you think about this in relation to tools like BAML?

What is a motivating use case that this solves?

It’s a noisy / busy syntax. Just my own opinion.

Why not library?

Next step, an LLM that writes convo-lang programs to programs with an LLM

This looks a lot like another effective way of interacting with LLMs: english-lang. Some of english-lang 's features are that it can be used to convey meaning, and it's largely accepted (network effect!). I'm excited to see what convo brings to the table /s

Nice try. We will eventually get there, but I think this can and need to get better.

The new COBOL. The next step is obviously to add syntax when you need to specify the type of the variables: put the type first, then the name and its value, and finish with a semicolon because it's fun, like "int n = 0;"

Why not as a library in Ruby or Python?