I still remember the disappointment I felt when, as a kid, tried Linux for the first time ever thanks to a magazine-attached live CD.
After years of hearing about this "alternative" OS, I was horrified to discover a UI that's very close to that of Windows. It felt boring and not as thrilling as I expected.
Today, I still appreciate the courage of those who go off the beaten roads of OS Land; even those that aren't as fun as templeOS.
taylodl•1h ago
I feel that back in the 80s QNX had already accomplished what Hurd had set out to do (https://blackberry.qnx.com/en/products/qnx-everywhere). Blackberry bought QNX decades after its creation but the core architecture - microkernel-based, modular, and real-time - was already mature and production-ready long before Hurd left the lab. Moreover, I've never known another OS to implement synchronous thread message passing the way QNX does.
ahmedfromtunis•1h ago
After years of hearing about this "alternative" OS, I was horrified to discover a UI that's very close to that of Windows. It felt boring and not as thrilling as I expected.
Today, I still appreciate the courage of those who go off the beaten roads of OS Land; even those that aren't as fun as templeOS.