frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Seedance2 – multi-shot AI video generation

https://www.genstory.app/story-template/seedance2-ai-story-generator
1•RyanMu•55s ago•1 comments

Πfs – The Data-Free Filesystem

https://github.com/philipl/pifs
1•ravenical•4m ago•0 comments

Go-busybox: A sandboxable port of busybox for AI agents

https://github.com/rcarmo/go-busybox
1•rcarmo•5m ago•0 comments

Quantization-Aware Distillation for NVFP4 Inference Accuracy Recovery [pdf]

https://research.nvidia.com/labs/nemotron/files/NVFP4-QAD-Report.pdf
1•gmays•5m ago•0 comments

xAI Merger Poses Bigger Threat to OpenAI, Anthropic

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2026-02-03/musk-s-xai-merger-poses-bigger-threat-to-op...
1•andsoitis•5m ago•0 comments

Atlas Airborne (Boston Dynamics and RAI Institute) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNorxwlZlFk
1•lysace•6m ago•0 comments

Zen Tools

http://postmake.io/zen-list
1•Malfunction92•9m ago•0 comments

Is the Detachment in the Room? – Agents, Cruelty, and Empathy

https://hailey.at/posts/3mear2n7v3k2r
1•carnevalem•9m ago•0 comments

The purpose of Continuous Integration is to fail

https://blog.nix-ci.com/post/2026-02-05_the-purpose-of-ci-is-to-fail
1•zdw•11m ago•0 comments

Apfelstrudel: Live coding music environment with AI agent chat

https://github.com/rcarmo/apfelstrudel
1•rcarmo•12m ago•0 comments

What Is Stoicism?

https://stoacentral.com/guides/what-is-stoicism
3•0xmattf•13m ago•0 comments

What happens when a neighborhood is built around a farm

https://grist.org/cities/what-happens-when-a-neighborhood-is-built-around-a-farm/
1•Brajeshwar•13m ago•0 comments

Every major galaxy is speeding away from the Milky Way, except one

https://www.livescience.com/space/cosmology/every-major-galaxy-is-speeding-away-from-the-milky-wa...
2•Brajeshwar•13m ago•0 comments

Extreme Inequality Presages the Revolt Against It

https://www.noemamag.com/extreme-inequality-presages-the-revolt-against-it/
2•Brajeshwar•13m ago•0 comments

There's no such thing as "tech" (Ten years later)

1•dtjb•14m ago•0 comments

What Really Killed Flash Player: A Six-Year Campaign of Deliberate Platform Work

https://medium.com/@aglaforge/what-really-killed-flash-player-a-six-year-campaign-of-deliberate-p...
1•jbegley•15m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Anyone orchestrating multiple AI coding agents in parallel?

1•buildingwdavid•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Knowledge-Bank

https://github.com/gabrywu-public/knowledge-bank
1•gabrywu•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: The Codeverse Hub Linux

https://github.com/TheCodeVerseHub/CodeVerseLinuxDistro
3•sinisterMage•23m ago•2 comments

Take a trip to Japan's Dododo Land, the most irritating place on Earth

https://soranews24.com/2026/02/07/take-a-trip-to-japans-dododo-land-the-most-irritating-place-on-...
2•zdw•23m ago•0 comments

British drivers over 70 to face eye tests every three years

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c205nxy0p31o
26•bookofjoe•23m ago•10 comments

BookTalk: A Reading Companion That Captures Your Voice

https://github.com/bramses/BookTalk
1•_bramses•24m ago•0 comments

Is AI "good" yet? – tracking HN's sentiment on AI coding

https://www.is-ai-good-yet.com/#home
3•ilyaizen•25m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Amdb – Tree-sitter based memory for AI agents (Rust)

https://github.com/BETAER-08/amdb
1•try_betaer•26m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw Partners with VirusTotal for Skill Security

https://openclaw.ai/blog/virustotal-partnership
2•anhxuan•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Seedance 2.0 Release

https://seedancy2.com/
2•funnycoding•26m ago•0 comments

Leisure Suit Larry's Al Lowe on model trains, funny deaths and Disney

https://spillhistorie.no/2026/02/06/interview-with-sierra-veteran-al-lowe/
1•thelok•26m ago•0 comments

Towards Self-Driving Codebases

https://cursor.com/blog/self-driving-codebases
1•edwinarbus•27m ago•0 comments

VCF West: Whirlwind Software Restoration – Guy Fedorkow [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLoXodz1N9A
1•stmw•27m ago•1 comments

Show HN: COGext – A minimalist, open-source system monitor for Chrome (<550KB)

https://github.com/tchoa91/cog-ext
1•tchoa91•28m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Brazil's top court rules US laws do not apply to its territory

https://www.rfi.fr/en/international-news/20250819-brazil-s-top-court-rules-us-laws-do-not-apply-to-its-territory
28•matheusmoreira•5mo ago

Comments

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> According to the Constitution of Brazil, foreign court decisions "can only be enforced in Brazil upon approval or in compliance with international judicial cooperation mechanisms," the court said.

> Although the ruling did not explicitly mention the Magnitsky Act, a Brazilian court source told AFP that the ruling "in theory" invalidates the law in Brazil -- though Washington has already contested this interpretation.

They are moving to sacrifice the country's entire economy in order to maintain the despotic supreme court judge who got sanctioned under Magnitsky.

If they keep this up it's pretty much over for this country. Wow.

duxup•5mo ago
I'm a little lost on the whole story here, article is short.

What did the US government expect? The Brazilian government to carry out their wishes just because of US legal action in the US?

cactacea•5mo ago
Essentially, yes. Trump has no understanding of what the word sovereign means (or just doesn't care).
matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> I'm a little lost on the whole story here, article is short.

I submitted to HN and discussed all the major episodes of this saga. Here are the links if you'd like to know more.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44152909

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44188337

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44256169

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44613114

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44736860

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44793777

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44869353

Some of these have been flagged and my comments are almost always downvoted to oblivion but I don't care, I will continue speaking out because these are my honest opinions on the subject.

Under the pretext of protecting denocracy, the unelected, supposedly impartial brazilian supreme court waged an all out legal and political war against our "Trump equivalent". They have engaged in unconstitutional censorship and politically motivated arrests.

They have usurped the functions of the legislative and executive branches of government. They are essentially judge-kings and have transformed my country into a dictatorship of the judiciary.

One of these judges has been sanctioned by the USA under the Magnitsky Act, an unprecedented consequence that nobody thought would ever happen. I mean that literally: these judges publicly mocked the idea that they would ever be sanctioned for their actions.

Now they are apparently moving to defy the sanctions by ordering banks to continue providing services to the sanctioned judge despite the sanctions.

This will get our banks banned from the international banking system, isolating our country. The economic damage this will cause simply cannot be calculated.

Brazil is essentially the world's soy farm and we import like 70% of our fertilizer. They're going to sacrifice everything to protect these judges and display their non-existent "sovereignty", like a defiant child trying to stand up to its parent. Brazil is pretty much done for if this continues.

ronsor•5mo ago
> This will get our banks banned from the international banking system, isolating our country. The ecomomic [sic] damage this will cause simply cannot be calculated.

Is this going to be like the Russian sanctions?

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
I'm not sure... I don't think they will be that strong but still pretty bad.

The sanctioned judge has been essentially permabanned from the US financial system. Everything that touches US dollars is now banned from transacting with him. He cannot even have a brazilian bank account since they absolutely do business with US institutions.

This news is essentially them saying "Magnitsky is invalid here, you cannot refuse service to the judge unless we say so". It looks like they're going to force the issue.

This will immediately expose Brazil to secondary sanctions. All banks that comply with the supreme court will be sanctioned and cut off from US institutions. Every single brazilian will be affected.

This will no doubt cause foreign investment to flee the country as Brazil becomes high risk. It will also probably significantly reduce or destroy our USD reserves, indirectly devaluing our already devalued currency.

motorest•5mo ago
> The sanctioned judge has been essentially permabanned from the US financial system.

You're referring to the fact that the Trump administration is engaged in persecuting individual judges ruling on a coup attempt, hoping to intimidate them into submission to deliver the ruling they demand.

And you glance over this as a "permaban".

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
You cannot convince me a thousand unarmed civilians attempted a military coup. Protesters from the current ruling party have done far worse things than those people did. They've set those same buildings on fire and nobody ever jailed them for 18 years over it.

That protest was directly caused by the supreme court's profoundly destabilizing actions prior to the 2022 election. In 2019 they gave themselves powers to investigate, prosecute, judge and punish wildcard crimes against themselves encompassing the whole brazilian territory. Then they started engaging in unconstitutional political censorship targeting Bolsonaro and his supporters. I was there, I saw them do it. Any claims to the contrary are gaslighting.

motorest•5mo ago
> You cannot convince me a thousand unarmed civilians attempted a military coup.

I don't care about at what level of delusion you're operating.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Brazilian_coup_plot

arunabha•5mo ago
> Some of these have been flagged and my comments are almost always downvoted to oblivion but I don't care, I will continue speaking out because these are my honest opinions on the subject.

If only you spent a fraction of that energy on self reflection...

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
Do you have a point to make?

My thoughts are all there in my comment. If you disagree, then just refute them. I'd love to have reasons to believe things are not as bad as they seem.

motorest•5mo ago
> Do you have a point to make?

I believe there is a strong point to make. Not only are engaged in obsessive compulsive behavior but you are also leaning on alternative versions of reality/accounts to form your opinions.

You posted in other threads that you are going through therapy and your therapist already gave you directives regarding your obsession over this topic. I feel OP's point reiterate your therapist's feedback.

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> you are also leaning on alternative versions of reality/accounts

What is this supposed to mean? My view points are "alternative" and therefore wrong? No.

motorest•5mo ago
> What is this supposed to mean? My view points are "alternative" and therefore wrong? No.

That's something you need to work out with your therapist, given that all the people reiterating that point to you in all those threads didn't seemed to get through to you.

db48x•5mo ago
While this is no doubt an important topic of discussion, you keep getting flagged because it’s off topic for HN. Check the guidelines <https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html>:

    On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

    Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic. 
You would probably have better luck finding a different forum to discuss it on.
matheusmoreira•5mo ago
Yeah I know... I know that it's not a good fit for HN. I post this here because this is the only place I feel safe discussing this.

I do hope I'm not being too much of a pain on dang's butt... My account is already rate limited to about 5 posts every two hours or so and I think that's absolutely fair. I emailed him once about it, he explained his reasons and I accepted them and the limitation. I hope HN's downraking of political threads neutralize any disruption these discussions could possibly cause.

I know I'm going to sound like a paranoid schizophrenic by saying this but please keep in mind that there's at least a possibility that the flaggings and downvotes are politically motivated.

People have created sockpuppet accounts here and called me out by name because of the views I express.

https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=forabolsonaro

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35900285

owebmaster•5mo ago
> I know I'm going to sound like a paranoid schizophrenic by saying this but please keep in mind that there's at least a possibility that the flaggings and downvotes are politically motivated.

Those are both true. As a Brazilian, I'm politically motivated to engage with these lies that bring so much damage for a whole nation of 200million people.

Edit: Really, reading the links and the suppositions, I honestly recommend you to refrain from engaging in this kind of crusade. It does you no benefit and tech has a big list of smart developers that went crazy going a similar route.

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> I'm politically motivated

Thank you for admitting to it.

> lies

Repeating it won't make it true. I've explained what I think and why I think it numerous times. I have no reason to think differently if you can't present strong counter arguments as to why I should.

petronio•5mo ago
> Brazil is essentially the world's soy farm and we import like 70% of our fertilizer.

You might want to check the sources from which we import those fertilizers, largest of which are Russia and China. While some do come from more US aligned sources, including the US itself, most of the names on that list have no problems ignoring US sanctions if it comes to that.

> They're going to sacrifice everything to protect these judges and display their non-existent "sovereignty", like a defiant child trying to stand up to its parent.

Our sovereignty is very much real and existent :)

> Brazil is pretty much done for if this continues.

Nope, we'll be fine.

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> most of the names on that list have no problems ignoring US sanctions if it comes to that

Somehow I doubt it...

Trump has already imposed 50% tariffs, causing major economic losses. NATO has already threatened to impose 100% tariffs on us if we keep buying russian oil. And these are mere tariffs, not actual sanctions.

It's very hard to predict what's going to happen if things keep spiralling out of control.

> Our sovereignty is very much real and existent :)

Sovereignty must be backed up by military and economic power. We have neither. It's complete fantasy.

Do you really think the likes of China and Russia are going to defend us and our interests if push comes to shove?

Look at Ukraine. Gave up nuclear weapons because the USA promised to defend them if push came to shove. How's it going for them?

They'll use us like pawns and then turn us into their own backyard. Not that our relation with the USA is any different but personally I'd rather live in the USA's backyard than in China's backyard.

> Nope, we'll be fine.

Remains to be seen.

petronio•5mo ago
> Trump has already imposed 50% tariffs, causing major economic losses. NATO has already threatened to impose 100% tariffs on us if we keep buying russian oil. And these are mere tariffs, not actual sanctions.

Maybe we're looking at vastly different numbers, but most analysts are expecting little to no impact from the 50% tariffs. The US only makes up 12% of our exports, and they've already cut down the scope so that only around 36% of those are even affected. Since we mostly export commodities, even those 36% can just be sold elsewhere.

The NATO claims are irrelevant: NATO is not a trade alliance and the US struggles to get it to comply even with its intended military goals. You can safely place the odds of the other NATO countries agreeing to their own tariffs at approximately 0%.

> Sovereignty must be backed up by military and economic power. We have neither. It's complete fantasy.

Not sure where you get this idea? We have both military and economic power. Just because we're not as large as the US or China doesn't mean we have nothing.

Also, I don't see why you think there's a possibility of this escalating to war. Trump already had to back down with large exceptions to his 50% tariffs due to the domestic political impact it would have, and war is extremely unpopular with the Americans these days, which is why they only fund Ukraine and Israel instead of actually sending soldiers to fight.

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> Maybe we're looking at vastly different numbers

Even though the scope of the tariffs was reduced, we're still talking figures around hundreds of billions of BRL worth of immediate damage to the economy, with long term losses uncertain.

> Since we mostly export commodities, even those 36% can just be sold elsewhere.

There is no guarantee that there will be enough demand from alternative buyers to fully mitigate the long term damage.

> You can safely place the odds of the other NATO countries agreeing to their own tariffs at approximately 0%.

People told me the same thing about the Magnitsky sanctions. I realize that as of this moment it's all just threats but I won't doubt them.

> Not sure where you get this idea?

Well, from the fact Trump could order a single B2 Spirit to wipe Brasília off the map and there'd be nothing at all the entire brazilian military could do about it.

The USA can also effortlessly isolate our country via economic levers. There's no need to fire any bullets. Those levers are going to move some mountains if the supreme court keeps protecting the sanctioned judge.

> I don't see why you think there's a possibility of this escalating to war

I do think that's very unlikely. They'll probably keep leveraging their massive economy and USD hegemony against us.

hshdhdhj4444•5mo ago
> This will get our banks banned from the international banking system, isolating our country. The economic damage this will cause simply cannot be calculated.

What about Trump’s actions makes anyone think that Brazil will escape this fate if only it suborns its democracy to Trump’s whims?

Of the BRICS nation, the only one that isn’t being targeted by Trump is Russia. We don’t need to get into why that is.

India is being targeted purportedly for importing Russian oil which is obviously nonsensical considering Russia keeps escaping additional sanctions and other areas, such as China which imports more Russian oil and the EU which imports far more gas, don’t face sanctions for this reason.

China has been facing a whole set of sanctions for the past 6 months and other restrictions.

South Africa faced an escalation based on nonsensical claims of white genocide (South Africa has a massive crime problem…there’s no evidence it’s targeted towards white people and if anything the opposite seems true considering black South Africans are suffering more from crime than white SA)

And these are just BRICS. We haven’t even gotten to the Penguins yet.

motorest•5mo ago
> What about Trump’s actions makes anyone think that Brazil will escape this fate if only it suborns its democracy to Trump’s whims

The Trump administration is persecuting Brazil for bringing the perpetrators of a coup to trial, and went to the extent of threatening individua judges of the trial with sanctions if their ruling is unfavourable to Trump.

This has by no means any relationship with democracy or basic democratic principles.

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
The only coup that took place here was perpetrated by the unelected supreme court itself. Not a single person voted for those judges. They gave themselves extraordinary powers and have usurped the functions of the other branches of government. There is nothing democratic or principled about their monocratic decisions or their censorship and imprisonment of their political opposition.
motorest•5mo ago
> The only coup that took place here was perpetrated by the unelected supreme court itself.

This is your very personal version of reality, and one where you don't even stop to think about all the absurdities and inconsistencies it's built upon.

You seriously need to step away from the keyboard and reassess what you are doing.

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> absurdities and inconsistencies

Elaborate on every single one of them. Otherwise, there is no point in replying.

motorest•5mo ago
> Under the pretext of protecting denocracy, the unelected, supposedly impartial brazilian supreme court waged an all out legal and political war against our "Trump equivalent". They have engaged in unconstitutional censorship and politically motivated arrests.

This personal opinion sounds awfully outlandish, and it's baffling how it leaves out the fact that the "trump equivalent" engaged in a coup and your wall of text boils down to "he is facing a trial for his coup attempt, and he is currently awaiting sentence".

In fact, each discussion you cited reminds you of this fact, but somehow you repeatedly posted outlandish comments, such as claiming that judges ruling over a coup attempt are somehow the ones perpetrating a coup?

Perhaps someone else from Brazil should chime in, as I feel your comments convey an alternative version of reality that doesn't reflect the majority of facts and instead leans heavily on unsupported and very emotional and partial interpretations.

Edit: while reading through the discussions you cited, I stumbled upon your comment discussing how you are going through therapy and your therapist already gave you recommendations on how you should modulate your behavior. Perhaps it's time to consider the recommendation.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44744606

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> your wall of text

That was merely a summary of my commentary on the matter over the course of many HN threads.

There's no point in engaging with you if you won't actually read those arguments.

You've clearly demonstrated you're not willing to actually discuss this. So I won't either.

owebmaster•5mo ago
Do you feel like you are on a Crusade? All the posts you are always arguing alone, repeating the same arguments, ignoring everything multiple different people says and then get back to the same vitriolic argument.
matheusmoreira•5mo ago
> Do you feel like you are on a Crusade?

I just care a lot. What's going on in this country deeply offends my sense of justice.

> ignoring everything multiple different people says

Nope, I try really hard to not ignore things. When I disagree, I explain why. If I can't rationalize it, then I must incorporate it into my world view.

I do ignore name calling, feigned concern and vague allusions to mental illness. You too have done this before. I won't engage with it.

hulitu•5mo ago
> Now they are apparently moving to defy the sanctions by ordering banks to continue providing services to the sanctioned judge despite the sanctions.

A sovereign country has its own laws and the laws only apply within its territory. There are countries who try to be the World Police but, sometimes, with limited success.

matheusmoreira•5mo ago
Brazil cannot even hope to overturn the application of this sanction by the global financial system.

They are judge-kings, of course they can order local banks to comply and order police to jail the bankers if they disobey. The point is if they do that the banks themselves will be sanctioned and every single brazilian will pay the price.

mmacvicarprett•5mo ago
“those providing material support to human rights abusers face sanctions risk themselves.” The irony, this comes from a government with strong ties to Saudi Arabia, Israel and El Salvador.
general1726•5mo ago
This is something what USA is taking for granted. Case and point - DMCA. American companies are sending DMCA takedown through their lawyers and then being surprised that nothing may happen when DMCA takedown is ignored by European company with no exposure to USA (services nor presence).