Normally they have to fight VPN issues anyway, but having a sovereign state inject your packets is certainly a fun new one.
It’s good to know the boss.
But there absolutely is also a non-negligible number of Chinese and Indian nationals, who have some type of visa status in the US (especially a green card) who spend many months in their original countries making $200,000 or more per year while living like royalty in their home countries :)
So much has happened since then...
If you get a green card and leave the us for any amount of time, on return the border agent makes a determination on the spot if you intended to live abroad.
Less than six months is simply less suspicious than more.
Now, the people I work with know that I'm not really located in the same time zone, but I know people who don't bother to mention it. I rarely get phone calls, but I have a roaming connection active for banking/OTP/etc. Plenty of cheap cafes with great WiFi (500mbps+ almost everywhere), and several times cheaper too.
Because they have some of the most beautiful scenery and buildings I've seen and I've been to dozens of countries.
Personally I wouldn't go there for remote work, because the internet interference is a pain but a holiday definitely.
The nature spans salt lakes and rainbow mountains akin to South America, to the Northern Lights in Mohe down to karst formations of Guilin shared with Vietnam's Halong Bay.
The cuisine is diverse and dishes popular in places like Xi'an reveal lasting influences dating back to the Silk Road.
If you can't find "somewhere really nice" amongst the myriad people and locations you haven't tried.
If it wasn't literally 10x cheaper to live abroad than it is to live in Seattle/San Jose, it wouldn't be as prevalent. And not to mention, the quality of life is often better at the 10x cheaper price as well.
I can give you as much proof as you would like!
Example: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-...
That Cloudflare had an outage. Not America.
You probably mean the USA? After all, it was China and not Asia which was responsible for the incident ;)
in this case, the connection works fine, some extra RST+ACK packets were delivered to your network on purpose
But GFW certainly had the capability to block all ports. So no one really knew.
If I understand right, a good next step would would be with eBPF or some type of proxy ignore the forged RST+ACK at the beginning.
Then it would come testing to see if sending a bunch of ACK packets, perhaps with sequence numbers that would when reconstructed could complete the handshake. Trying to send them alongside the SYN+ACK or even before if it can be predicted. Maybe try sending some packets with sequence id 0 as well to see what happens.
kotri•2h ago
hackernewsdhsu•2h ago
phantomathkg•1h ago
wkat4242•1h ago
cedws•1h ago
Gigachad•53m ago
eastbound•1h ago
vintermann•1h ago
woooooo•1h ago
If it's on purpose, I think you have the most likely motivation.
wkat4242•1h ago
methou•1h ago
NitpickLawyer•1h ago
andrewinardeer•1h ago
NitpickLawyer•1h ago
Helmut10001•1h ago
Zacharias030•53m ago
4gotunameagain•51m ago
Every major power has polluted near Earth space as a show of power.
cyberax•31m ago
therein•26m ago
perihelions•16m ago
[0] https://planet4589.org/space/con/star/planes.html
(On general principles, you could argue you'd need 1:1 launch vehicle parity (number, not payload) to defeat a satellite constellation this way. For each satellite launch, you'd need one corresponding anti-satellite launch into that same, newly-defined orbit).
perihelions•42m ago
Relevant, Chinese domestic media reporting on China's own perspective:
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3178939/chin... ("China military must be able to destroy Elon Musk’s Starlink satellites if they threaten national security: scientists" (2022))
> "Researchers call for development of anti-satellite capabilities including ability to track, monitor and disable each craft / The Starlink platform with its thousands of satellites is believed to be indestructible"
"Easy to bring down" vs. "believed to be indestructible"—some tension there!
progbits•54m ago
senectus1•34m ago
audunw•25m ago
And I doubt China would want to make LEO impossible to move through anyway. It’d affect China badly as well
stevage•1h ago
mryall•32m ago
preisschild•22m ago
veunes•36m ago
outworlder•32m ago
If you think this is bad...
You can't even have a blog in China without authorization. It doesn't matter if you pay "AWS" for a machine. It won't open port 80 or 443 until you get an ICP recordal. Which you can only do if you are in China, and get the approval. It should also be displayed in the site, like a license plate. The reason "AWS" is in quotes is because it isn't AWS, they got kicked out. In Beijing, it is actually Sinnet, in Nginxia it's NWCD
You can only point to IPs in China from DNS servers in China - if you try to use, say, Route53 in the US and add an A record there, you'll get a nasty email (fail to comply, and your ports get blocked again, possibly for good).
In a nutshell, they not only can shutdown cross border traffic (and that can happen randomly if the Great Firewall gets annoyed at your packets, and it also gets overloaded during China business hours), but they can easily shutdown any website they want.
UltraSane•20m ago
I added an A record for subdomain and pointed it at Chinese IP addresses. I wonder if I will get that angry email?