I wonder why drug cartels don’t just change their names to get a similar advantage. If one of the Mexican drug cartels owned a social media company, would their name be rehabilitated the way Facebook’s was when it became Meta?
I wonder why drug cartels don’t just change their names to get a similar advantage. If one of the Mexican drug cartels owned a social media company, would their name be rehabilitated the way Facebook’s was when it became Meta?
bigyabai•1h ago
Most of their users would keep using Facebook if it was rebranded to "brain poison" and its logo changed to a skull-and-crossbones. It never rehabilitated, it was never sullied by the mainstream in the first place.
robthebrew•1h ago
piratesAndSons•1h ago
Also the fact that Facebook is popular despite it, is not itself proof accusation isn't true, example cigs and drugs