Beyond the big players like Digicert, I'm surprised smaller companies have survived LetsEncrypt for this long. They mentioned it in this post ad well, most are moving towards free providers. I wonder if we'll see more shutting down in the next few years. One thing I think they could compete on is validity period as LetsEncrypt keeps lowering theirs
Shouldn't we be worried about the internet being centralized to depend on LetsEncrypt? Imagine the shit show if the US government stopped LetsEncrypt from issuing certificates to every country outside of the US.
matharmin•1m ago
Luckily there are still other options out there. ZeroSSL is one I quite like: Free ACME-based certificates just like LetsEncrypt, without the rate limits, and does have paid plans if you need support. It also has better legacy client compatibility than LetsEncrypt as far as I know.
bapak•13m ago
> "From a sysadmin and operations perspective: What a stupid change. In the perfect cloud native, fully automated fantasy land, this might work and not even generate that much overhead work. In the real world, this will generate lots of manual work. At least, until folks replace their legacy hardware and manufacturers patch their shit."
Give me a break. This is your literal job description, something you should be able to do blind.
If any random FE developer can put a proxy in front of their servers so can you.
portaouflop•7m ago
Wrong thread?
abujazar•5m ago
Kind of concerning they're not keeping TLS cert issuance even if only for the brand. Let's Encrypt is great, but it would be unfortunate if it ended up as a de facto monopoly.
yogorenapan•29m ago
Kwpolska•23m ago
nickf•22m ago
o_m•8m ago
matharmin•1m ago