As an amateur private researcher I am tired of these studies and they should be ended and all health studies performed by publicly funded projects.
My strategy is to let conflicting parties fight it out over round of publication. This has at least three major benefits:
1. It forces the conflicting parties to be open and release their data for scrutinization.
2. It tests the peer-review process, helping create improvements that benefit all peer reviewing.
3. It lead snarky journal articles, which are more fun to read.
FollowingTheDao•2h ago
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/apnm-2023-0594