frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Bitwig Studio 6 details revealed, and editing gets a big boost

https://cdm.link/bitwig-studio-6-details/
1•robenkleene•1m ago•0 comments

FortMajeure: Authentication Bypass in FortiWeb

https://pwner.gg/blog/2025-08-13-fortiweb-cve-2025-52970
1•redbell•2m ago•0 comments

Tipping point in Gulf Stream may be reached as early as mid-century

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JC022651
2•tcumulus•2m ago•1 comments

Amazon aiming to deploy Kuiper satellite services in Vietnam

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/amazon-aiming-deploy-kuiper-satellite-services-v...
1•mooreds•5m ago•0 comments

Google Aiming for Gold

https://divested.dev/pages/blog#2025-08-27-android-issues
1•SubzeroCarnage•5m ago•0 comments

Publishers gather to discuss protocols over platforms

https://www.niemanlab.org/2025/08/the-next-internet-for-news-publishers-gather-to-discuss-protoco...
1•mooreds•5m ago•0 comments

Inline Style Exfiltration: leaking data with chained CSS conditionals

https://portswigger.net/research/inline-style-exfiltration
1•pentestercrab•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Write Code to Solve Minigames

https://codyssey.andersource.dev
1•andersource•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Minecraft Circle Generator

https://minecraftcirclegenerators.com
1•pqmpqm123•9m ago•0 comments

Salesforce data missing? It might be due to Salesloft breach, Google says

https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/27/salesforce_salesloft_breach/
1•rntn•9m ago•0 comments

Microsoft hosts emergency press conference after protesters 'storm a building'

https://www.theverge.com/microsoft/766429/microsoft-emergency-press-conference-palestine-protest
1•AlexandrB•9m ago•0 comments

We built TestDino to stop wasting hours on flaky/failing E2E test debugging

https://testdino.com/
1•pratik-tgx•10m ago•0 comments

Google's Gemini CLI Agent Comes to Zed

https://thenewstack.io/googles-gemini-cli-agent-comes-to-zed/
3•keithba•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Checkpoints for Claude Code [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lNL4K-75PE
2•punnerud•11m ago•0 comments

Bluesky now platform of choice for science community

https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/08/more-scientists-choose-bluesky-over-twitter/
7•carride•12m ago•1 comments

How Africa wants to redraw the world map

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/interactive/2025/mercator-map-africa-au-size/
1•bookofjoe•13m ago•1 comments

Malicious versions of Nx and some supporting plugins were published

https://github.com/nrwl/nx/security/advisories/GHSA-cxm3-wv7p-598c
1•todsacerdoti•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: DeepMyst- Model Router and Token Optimizer

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=deepmyst.com
1•bahaAbunojaim•19m ago•0 comments

Implementing Forth in Go and C

https://eli.thegreenplace.net/2025/implementing-forth-in-go-and-c/
6•Bogdanp•21m ago•0 comments

DeepMyst- Model Router and Token Optimizer

https://playgrounds.deepmyst.com/#/playground/ask
2•bahaAbunojaim•22m ago•1 comments

Found to fixed: Beehiiv paywall bypass and leaked JWT token

https://bencohen.substack.com/p/found-to-fixed-beehiiv-paywall-bypass
3•bcohen123•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I made an Animal Crossing style letter editor

https://acmail.idreesinc.com
1•IdreesInc•22m ago•0 comments

Twilio Founder's Inertia Enterprises Launches to Commercialize Fusion Energy

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250826432256/en/Inertia-Enterprises-Launches-to-Commerci...
1•coloneltcb•24m ago•0 comments

Kpop Demon Hunters becomes Netflix's most viewed film

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1kz12v08l1o
1•andsoitis•24m ago•0 comments

A vibe-coding tool for serious developers

https://appjet.ai
2•alexflashdrive•27m ago•5 comments

GitHub immutable releases (public preview)

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-08-26-releases-now-support-immutability-in-public-preview/
1•sandstrom•28m ago•1 comments

H2C Is on the Way

https://blog.bambulab.com/h2c-is-on-the-way-heres-how-it-all-started/
1•RobertTheNerd•31m ago•0 comments

Show HN: TruthGate: Self-hosted IPFS Gateway (Netlify for decentralized hosting)

1•crossivejoker•31m ago•0 comments

Some FEMA staff who signed dissent letter over agency cuts being put on leave

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/fema-letter-dissent-leave-1.7618680
3•throw0101a•32m ago•2 comments

I Wasn't Worried About the Fed. Now I Am

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-08-27/trump-the-fed-and-independence-now-i-m-worried
16•petethomas•33m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

F-35 pilot held 50-minute airborne conference call with engineers before crash

https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/27/us/alaska-f-35-crash-accident-report-hnk-ml
78•Michelangelo11•2h ago

Comments

greatgib•1h ago
Good news for the Greenland that US are unable to fly airplanes properly in cold weather :-D
tokai•1h ago
Not when the Danish Airforce use F35s.
nicce•1h ago
Or Finland…
Temporary_31337•1h ago
US can (effectively) shut down F35s remote.y
rokkamokka•1h ago
A scary proposition considering what the US is rapidly becoming
greenavocado•1h ago
Purchasing F35s is paying tribute to the empire so it doesn't come down on you harder with tariffs and compliance burdens. It's not meant to actually be useful.
owebmaster•54m ago
It still did not work, tho.
guappa•22m ago
Yeah and the tariffs are still there anyway so I don't understand why we aren't following suite and cancelling those orders.
ahmeneeroe-v2•8m ago
You don't have the leverage you think you have.
RankingMember•6m ago
Yep, anyone paying billions in what is effectively tribute to this admin is only playing themselves considering the stable genius seems to flip the game board every 5 minutes.
louthy•1h ago
Which still makes Greenland safe. If neither side can get off the ground or convince their planes that they're in the air.
the_real_cher•1h ago
The US is the most powerful 3 season military in the world.
deadbabe•1h ago
Now it makes sense why the US doesn’t care about climate change, winter is their weakness.
beezle•4m ago
The Vermont Air Guard has flown a contingent of 20 F-35s since 2020 without (so far) incident. https://www.158fw.ang.af.mil/
preisschild•1h ago
But why was there water in the hydraulic system in the first place?
42lux•1h ago
"Must be the water."
braza•1h ago
Ferrari F1 internal meme?[1]

[1] - https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nCoxNLdUSaE

4gotunameagain•1h ago
Because US$40 billion was apparently not enough to avoid problems that did not affect cold war era airplanes.

Maybe everything was colder back then so they took it into account ? Dunno.

grumpy-de-sre•1h ago
Likely contamination of ground handling equipment [1]. Unfortunately can happen. I wonder if the hydraulic fluid is hygroscopic or something?

1. https://www.pacaf.af.mil/Portals/6/documents/3_AIB%20Report....

4gotunameagain•1h ago
Hydraulic brake fluid is glycol ether based and hygroscopic. Planes usually use mineral based fluids which are not, but heck if I know what the F-35 uses.
grumpy-de-sre•1h ago
Quoting ChatGPT (and after a quick sanity check),

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter uses a specialized hydraulic fluid that’s based on a synthetic ester formulation, not a petroleum-based fluid.

Specifically, it uses phosphate ester–based fire-resistant hydraulic fluid (commonly in the MIL-PRF-83282 or newer MIL-PRF-87257 class).

Apparently the older phosphate-ester based hydraulic fluids were hygroscopic but I'm not sure if the newer variants are.

yobbo•1h ago
Sounds similar to DOT-5 brake fluid.

Maybe this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tributyl_phosphate

"The major uses of TBP in industry are as a component of aircraft hydraulic fluid, brake fluid, and as a solvent for extraction and purification of rare-earth metals from their ores"

It might be better if it is hygroscopic as the water won't separate and risk forming ice plugs in the hydraulic lines.

the__alchemist•1h ago
Thanks for the link. This is much more useful than the news article.
yobbo•1h ago
It could be condensation in expansion tanks, or it could be rain into open containers on the ground, or someone could have mistakenly poured cooling liquid (or something else) into the containers, or into the hydraulic system itself, or ...
MaxPock•1h ago
Who eats the loss under such circumstances?

Government or Lockheed Martin or are these 200 million dollar jets insured ?

nelox•1h ago
Self-insured. The government absorbs losses itself instead of purchasing commercial insurance.
zrail•1h ago
Ultimately the US taxpayers will eat the loss in either case. If the government tried to charge it back to Lockheed Martin they'd just raise the price on subsequent programs to compensate.

The government does insure weapons of war. Who would write the policy?

bedane•1h ago
is insurance for military equipment a thing? I had no idea.

If you have very deep pockets like a nation has, why not simply replace the lost hardware and never insure/pay premiums(which would be calculated to net a profit to the insurer)?

varispeed•1h ago
Usually wars, vis major are exceptions in insurance policies.
analog31•11m ago
... as is farce majeur.
the_real_cher•1h ago
The government issues bonds to pay for this and the federal reserve prints money to buy the bonds.

Its FREE money!!!

harshreality•1h ago
The view that GP seems to subscribe to is that, when you insure something and need to make a claim on that policy, the insurance money is free.

That's not any more true.

meindnoch•1h ago
Where did they get this 200million figure from? Sounds bogus.
dgacmu•4m ago
The per plane cost varies a lot depending on what you want to wrap in it: how much of the development costs you amortize, the modernization program, etc. but $200m is in the range.

("Total acquisition costs" vs the marginal cost of the next plane can result in a more than 2x difference in how much you think the plane costs)

ux266478•3m ago
F-14D unit cost was ~$74 million in 1988. Adjusting for inflation that's ~$202 million in 2025. It's not that unreasonable for an American fighter jet, honestly.
gdbsjjdn•24m ago
Don't worry, the US military will recoup the loss by extorting some more natural resources from Ukraine and building some sea-side condos in Gaza.
m000•1h ago
This is wild. You can't get away from these zoom calls even as an F-35 pilot.
mbirth•1h ago
I bet, once the gear malfunctioned, Clippy popped up on the screen and suggested to call support.
aduty•1h ago
Hey, all Clippy ever wanted to do was help.
m000•1h ago
At least it wasn't Bonzi Buddy telling jokes to lighten up the mood.
tigerBL00D•1h ago
Am I the only one thinking that it's time for something like an R2D2? Presumably it could get into some crammed spaces and thaw things out of needed. I'm sure it's a stupid idea, BTW, but a fun one )
whatsupdog•15m ago
I think the call was only 10 minutes long. For 40 minutes the pilot was just waiting for the next available representative.
swader999•7m ago
I'd pay a lot of money for a zoom premium version that has a real eject button.
voidUpdate•1h ago
> "they likely would have advised a planned full stop landing or a controlled ejection instead of a second touch-and-go"

Is that not what the pilot did anyway? Or is a "controlled ejection" different from what they did?

the_real_cher•1h ago
I had the exact same thought.
fabian2k•1h ago
The article mentioned that the aircraft become uncontrollable once it thought it was on the ground and switched control modes. And then the pilot ejected.

I assume a controlled ejection would have been during controlled flight at a time and location specifically chosen. This ejection was necessary because the plane was uncontrollable in the end.

voidUpdate•1h ago
Ah, I see, ejection in a controlled situation instead of "oh no, time to go now"
lentil_soup•1h ago
If I understood correctly, the ejection came after the second touch and go made the plane go into landed mode which made it impossible to fly anymore
freefaler•1h ago
So as a pilot you can't override the software to stop it from "thinking that the plane is on the ground" mode?

Something similar happened recently with A320 when it didn't want to land on an airfield during emergency unless it was flown in a special mode. But F-35 doesn't have that?

netsharc•23m ago
> unless it was flown in a special mode.

What fresh hell is that... reboot, jam F8 just as the "Airbus" logo shows up, and then select "Boot in safe mode"?

xattt•11m ago
Fly-by-wire aircraft have changeable “flight laws” that correspond to different levels of computer intervention to mitigate situations incompatible with controlled flight.

Think of it as various stability control modes in a modern car. Likely the aircraft needed to be put in the least restrictive flight law mode as a workaround.

seethishat•13m ago
"On the ground" = WoW sensors. WoW sensors have been around a long time (see link). And, humans probably should not have any say about that. If humans could override WoW, then the landing gear could be deployed or retracted when it should not and cause a lot of damage due to human error.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACARS

jcalvinowens•3m ago
Every airliner I'm familiar with allows the pilot to override that (force the wheels to raise even if the airplane thinks it's on the ground).
gherkinnn•1h ago
The F35 has been a shit show for 15 years or more. So not only is it a disaster at the tactical and operational level, with the US holding the keys and being run by a cretin, it is now also a strategic blunder.

The French were right with their strategic autonomy, de Gaulle evidently prescient, and the various EU countries falling for the F35 would have been better off choosing the Rafale or Gripen.

luma•1h ago
That is a patently absurd take, ask Iran how much of a shitshow it is to be on the receiving end of planes your AA can't see.
gherkinnn•1h ago
The B2 is what did the damage in Iran. F22 and F35 were reportedly sent to protect the bombers.

I don't see how that detracts from the point that the F35 has been fraught with problems and operating it is dependent on an unreliably ally.

hollerith•1h ago
Israel has no B2s. Israeli F35s flew constantly over Western and Central Iran (including Tehran) for 12 days as if Iran's extensive air-defense network was not even there, doing a lot of damage.

Russian milbloggers responded with, "Why can't the Russian air force fly over Ukraine like that?"

UltraSane•14m ago
This is completely wrong. B2 bombers only dropped the MOAB on the nuclear enrichment sites. Israel used F35s to bomb Iran at will. Iran didn't shoot down a single plane.
etempleton•23m ago
The F35 program had a ton of issues and was expensive, but so was the B2 program. Sometimes something good comes out of a difficult process. They have made a lot of F35s now and exported many of them with many many more on order. At this point I think it is fair to say the F35 is a successful platform.
UltraSane•15m ago
Ask Iran how much of a shit show the F35 is.
Molitor5901•1h ago
Considering they relieved a pilot of command for ejecting when his F-35 become unresponsive, now they make them sit on conference calls. That pilot is very brave, I think others would have ejected by now. Making them fly around up there is ridiculous.
5f3cfa1a•16m ago
Ejecting from an airplane is no joke: 18g of force leaves 20-30% with spinal fractures, and ejection seats have an 8% mortality rate[1]

It seems to me that continuing flight with inoperative/damaged landing gear while you discuss alternatives with engineers is the safest option. Burn fuel, make a plan, let people on the ground mobilize to help, and eject when you've tried what you can and it truly becomes the safest option.

[1]: https://sites.nd.edu/biomechanics-in-the-wild/2021/04/06/top...

RankingMember•10m ago
Upon first reading the headline I was thinking it was some sort of test flight. Nope, poor guy was just trying to fly and ended up forced into a high-stakes troubleshooting tree while on a conference call, as if there's not enough on your mind in a fighter cockpit.

I don't know how many human-manned gens of aircraft are left, but my first inclination is to think a remote-control fallback option wouldn't be out of line here if the security could be done right.

Aurornis•5m ago
> That pilot is very brave, I think others would have ejected by now. Making them fly around up there is ridiculous.

Definitely not. Ejecting is very risky. If the plane is possibly fixable you would much rather spend the time trying to calmly debug it to get it back to a point where you can land, rather than risk the possibly career ending physical injuries that can come from ejecting.

You also want to maneuver the plane into an area where it’s safer to crash.

The eject button isn’t the safe way out of every situation.

meindnoch•1h ago
On most meetings, I wish I was sitting in an ejection seat.
sschueller•1h ago
Switzerland, if they want something they can fly for air policing is forced to buy the F35 at what every price the US feels fit (even though the contract with Lockheed states a fixed price, naive politicians and consultants found out the hard way). Of course the CHF to USD conversion is fix at a shit rate from many years ago and from what I understand there is no way around that because the SNB did the conversion back then already.

We have no alternative we can get before 2035. They are talking about extending the F/A-18 but since we would be the only ones still using them we would have to pay for that too at who know what price.

The public approved 6 billion and now it looks like it will be way more, excluding skyrocketing maintenance which is not included and a patriot missile system that when it is finally delivered will cost who knows how many billions.

The whole thing is an absolute shit show here and that's ignoring the technical issues this thing has...

orwin•27m ago
With such a terrain, I would guess that agility and the ability to land on highway of in fields without burning all avionics and electronics would have been rated higher than stealth, but it wasn't. Still, the Swiss were offered a fairly low price, and promised low operating costs, and that's the main reason they didn't choose the Eurofighter (which isn't a multi-purpose jet but an interceptor)
stripe_away•22m ago
JAS 39 Gripen can land on roads. Might have been a better choice.
UltraSane•16m ago
Israel's attack on Iran using the F-35 proves it is a very effective, if expensive, weapon.
efitz•1h ago
F-35 is a boondoggle.

$200M for one fighter plane is insane.

If the USA ever had to go to war with this weapon, a huge number of them would be offline at any given time, and every single airframe loss would cause a huge dent in overall combat power.

I don’t understand why our military and political leaders keep trying to buy ridiculously overpriced Swiss Army knife weapons (lots of flexibility but great at nothing) instead of mass producing combat knives (only good for one thing but great at it and lots of them).

Giorgi•1h ago
Article reads like they are still blaming pilot, like what else he/she was supposed to do?!
kotaKat•1h ago
> It said if the conference call participants had referenced the 2024 maintenance newsletter, “they likely would have advised a planned full stop landing or a controlled ejection instead of a second touch-and-go” that eventually led to the conditions that caused the crash, the report said.

I guess the engineers on the call didn’t get the memo about those pesky TPS reports.

upofadown•1h ago
Always blame the user...

No downside if you are wrong. The people who actually run complex systems have no political power. If you get away with it then you might be able to avoid expensive changes.

yellow_lead•1h ago
> Five engineers participated in the call, including a senior software engineer, a flight safety engineer and three specialists in landing gear systems, the report said.

I can't imagine the stress of being on this call as an engineer. It's like a production outage but the consequences are life and death. Of course, the pilot probably felt more stressed.

el_benhameen•25m ago
That initial “oh shit” feeling must have been so much worse than for us regular boring engineers. Google’s not gonna save you on that one.
rfoo•13m ago
For a whim I read this as "us regular boeing engineers" and it was really funny.
refactor_master•23m ago
“I vibe coded that part, but all the tests passed”
airstrike•11m ago
[delayed]
panki27•1h ago
Not your average end user call for support...
mytailorisrich•1h ago
The F-35 is unstable by design and requires constant adjustments by the computer system to fly. So it is actually impossible to "just" turn the computer off and fly manually.
ahmeneeroe-v2•3m ago
This is true for basically every fighter jet and stealth aircraft
cyclecount•9m ago
These planes are huge pieces of shit. No country should be spending money buying these from the US / Lockheed Martin.
nialv7•3m ago
Is it just me or the title made it seemed like the conference call was the cause of the crash?
ChicagoBoy11•3m ago
Very different scenario, but flying my puddle jumper one of the first times after getting my license, once I took off from an airport in Connecticut and was about to cross a large body of water, my exhaust temperatures spiked really, really high, essentially indicating the engine was seconds from melting. But it didn't.

So of course I felt it was a sensor issue (especially since it sounded/felt great), but luckily with the equipment on board I managed a call to the flight school, who put me in touch with the mechanic. I circled above an airport as he pulled up the maintenance logs, we discussed what I was seeing, he noted that there had been a report of a sensor issue that had been squawked, so we concluded I should feel safe to fly straight home.

At the time it felt insanely cool to be able to be doing that WHILE flying the plane. While an unfortunate outcome for this particular pilot, as an elite pilot, part of me thinks when this cropped up part of him was like: "ahh right, this is why I'm top dog"