frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ask HN: AI Generated Diagrams

1•voidhorse•1m ago•0 comments

Microsoft Account bugs locked me out of Notepad – are Thin Clients ruining PCs?

https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/windows-11/windows-locked-me-out-of-notepad-is-the-thin-...
1•josephcsible•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A delightful Mac app to vibe code beautiful iOS apps

https://milq.ai/hacker-news
1•jdjuwadi•4m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Gemini Station – A local Chrome extension to organize AI chats

https://github.com/rajeshkumarblr/gemini_station
1•rajeshkumar_dev•4m ago•0 comments

Welfare states build financial markets through social policy design

https://theloop.ecpr.eu/its-not-finance-its-your-pensions/
2•kome•8m ago•0 comments

Market orientation and national homicide rates

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9125.70023
3•PaulHoule•8m ago•0 comments

California urges people avoid wild mushrooms after 4 deaths, 3 liver transplants

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-death-cap-mushrooms-poisonings-liver-transplants/
1•rolph•9m ago•0 comments

Matthew Shulman, co-creator of Intellisense, died 2019 March 22

https://www.capenews.net/falmouth/obituaries/matthew-a-shulman/article_33af6330-4f52-5f69-a9ff-58...
3•canucker2016•10m ago•1 comments

Show HN: SuperLocalMemory – AI memory that stays on your machine, forever free

https://github.com/varun369/SuperLocalMemoryV2
1•varunpratap369•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pyrig – One command to set up a production-ready Python project

https://github.com/Winipedia/pyrig
1•Winipedia•13m ago•0 comments

Fast Response or Silence: Conversation Persistence in an AI-Agent Social Network [pdf]

https://github.com/AysajanE/moltbook-persistence/blob/main/paper/main.pdf
1•EagleEdge•13m ago•0 comments

C and C++ dependencies: don't dream it, be it

https://nibblestew.blogspot.com/2026/02/c-and-c-dependencies-dont-dream-it-be-it.html
1•ingve•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Vbuckets – Infinite virtual S3 buckets

https://github.com/danthegoodman1/vbuckets
1•dangoodmanUT•14m ago•0 comments

Open Molten Claw: Post-Eval as a Service

https://idiallo.com/blog/open-molten-claw
1•watchful_moose•15m ago•0 comments

New York Budget Bill Mandates File Scans for 3D Printers

https://reclaimthenet.org/new-york-3d-printer-law-mandates-firearm-file-blocking
2•bilsbie•16m ago•1 comments

The End of Software as a Business?

https://www.thatwastheweek.com/p/ai-is-growing-up-its-ceos-arent
1•kteare•17m ago•0 comments

Exploring 1,400 reusable skills for AI coding tools

https://ai-devkit.com/skills/
1•hoangnnguyen•17m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A unique twist on Tetris and block puzzle

https://playdropstack.com/
1•lastodyssey•21m ago•0 comments

The logs I never read

https://pydantic.dev/articles/the-logs-i-never-read
1•nojito•22m ago•0 comments

How to use AI with expressive writing without generating AI slop

https://idratherbewriting.com/blog/bakhtin-collapse-ai-expressive-writing
1•cnunciato•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: LinkScope – Real-Time UART Analyzer Using ESP32-S3 and PC GUI

https://github.com/choihimchan/linkscope-bpu-uart-analyzer
1•octablock•23m ago•0 comments

Cppsp v1.4.5–custom pattern-driven, nested, namespace-scoped templates

https://github.com/user19870/cppsp
1•user19870•25m ago•1 comments

The next frontier in weight-loss drugs: one-time gene therapy

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2026/01/24/fractyl-glp1-gene-therapy/
2•bookofjoe•27m ago•1 comments

At Age 25, Wikipedia Refuses to Evolve

https://spectrum.ieee.org/wikipedia-at-25
2•asdefghyk•30m ago•4 comments

Show HN: ReviewReact – AI review responses inside Google Maps ($19/mo)

https://reviewreact.com
2•sara_builds•31m ago•1 comments

Why AlphaTensor Failed at 3x3 Matrix Multiplication: The Anchor Barrier

https://zenodo.org/records/18514533
1•DarenWatson•32m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How much of your token use is fixing the bugs Claude Code causes?

1•laurex•35m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Agents – Sync MCP Configs Across Claude, Cursor, Codex Automatically

https://github.com/amtiYo/agents
1•amtiyo•36m ago•0 comments

Hello

2•otrebladih•37m ago•1 comments

FSD helped save my father's life during a heart attack

https://twitter.com/JJackBrandt/status/2019852423980875794
3•blacktulip•40m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

A power shortage could short-circuit Nvidia's rise

https://www.economist.com/business/2025/08/28/how-a-power-shortage-could-short-circuit-nvidias-rise
37•1vuio0pswjnm7•5mo ago

Comments

jedberg•5mo ago
I worked for a company making GPU clouds. The biggest problem we had for deployments was not getting GPUs -- we had plenty of those sitting in warehouses. The biggest issue was finding data center space with sufficient power and cooling. There was plenty of square footage, just not enough power for it all.

They're now building gigawatt datacenters to handle all the GPUs.

The big question is were to build them. There are only a few places with cheap and plentiful power. One of those is Quebec (but it's not that big and there is a lot of regulation). Another is Texas (except their grid isn't very stable). And the last is China. And you can't build a datacenter in China unless you're Chinese.

It'll be interesting to see how this pans out. Maybe the current admin (which is big on deregulation) will make it easier to build power plants, especially nuclear ones.

Edit: I wrote this comment four days ago. I couldn't figure out why I was suddenly getting a bunch of replies to it. Apparently when HN does a second chance, they just reset the time on all the comments. Odd, but I guess it makes sense knowing what I know about how the sorting is calculated. It's probably the easiest way.

philipallstar•5mo ago
Making it easier to build nuclear power stations would be extremely useful. Let's hope nothing of value is lost in that process.
MadDemon•5mo ago
Places further north are great contenders because of the free cooling. Also, many of them have cheap electricity from hydro or even geothermal, like Iceland.
general1726•5mo ago
I bet on natural gas powerplants will start being built together with data centers.
wmf•5mo ago
Ironically xAI is already doing this.
joak•5mo ago
Nuclear power plants take something like a decade to build (after permitting)

It makes more sense to go for PV plus batteries that can be installed in a matter of weeks

lukebechtel•5mo ago
how much of that 10 years is the physical limit, and how much is social / cultural / organizational / political overhead?
protocolture•5mo ago
From memory, when the brits got out of their own way they could build a nuke plant every 6-8 years.
adrianN•5mo ago
Does that matter much when you want to have a datacenter as quickly as possible? It’s not like those things will change quickly.
lukebechtel•5mo ago
yes -- knowing the physical limit can motivate moving closer to it.
jeffbee•5mo ago
> after permitting

Load-bearing parenthetical!

> Nuclear power plants take something like a decade to build

The most-recently completed fission power station on this planet needed 23 years under construction and it is still in testing. A recent American one took 15 years.

protocolture•5mo ago
When the brits were at it (With insourced nuclear engineering and low regulatory overhead) they could crank them out every 6 - 8 years.

The brits let all that technical capability wither and could not do it again right now.

But if someone was willing its still theoretically possible. Just takes total alignment between government and private.

jeffbee•5mo ago
OK, but people who want these actually have to build them in the countries that exist. This isn't Civilization. You cannot switch to a civic that gets more hammers at the beginning of your next turn.
protocolture•5mo ago
Sure but the argument against nuclear is always the same. Its hard right now.

The problem is that if you dont start correcting that hardness now, the next time you think you might need a nuclear industry, its still hard.

You need to train, grant experience and give money to professionals so they can exist to build stuff. It took the UK ~ 15 years to get started, then they were cranking them out like no ones business.

Think of it this way, in 15 years you can have something you might need, or you can guarantee you wont have it whether you need it or not.

Thing is its the same for all large infrastructure products. But only in nuke do we have people actively trying to prevent the industry from being created and maintained so they can use the unreadyness as an excuse.

nemomarx•5mo ago
How do you get the expertise back on a dime?

You have to tack on a few slow builds that create talent and local knowledge for that, or poaching people from China Operation Paperclip style maybe.

XorNot•5mo ago
It's why the Vogtle plant is on track to lead to the worst possible outcome: yes it was very expensive. So the best thing to do is to start building another one right away while all those lessons and skills are still current.
jeffbee•5mo ago
Or we could just use solar and batteries that can be installed by a combination of literally any basic carpenters, electricians, and truckers.
senectus1•5mo ago
South Korea built 13 nuclear reactors in recent decades, with an average construction period of 56 months...

Apparently Japan is the fastest builder (46 months).

the 10 year+ issue is a western problem.

zetazzed•5mo ago
Ok but telling someone they can have GPUs online in a mere 5 years if they build as fast as SK is still going to be a very painful pill. How do we get a DC in a year?
walterbell•5mo ago

  How do we get a DC in a year?
Migrate an existing plant? https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/elon-musks-xai-bu...

> The company has apparently been thinking outside the box to meet its power needs, with Musk stating a couple of weeks ago that it intends to buy a power plant from abroad and import it into the US to provide energy for its data centers.

worik•5mo ago
That did not go well for the Japanese
eli_gottlieb•5mo ago
Skill issue!
wmf•5mo ago
The Texas grid is stable now that they added batteries BTW.
jeffbee•5mo ago
> One of those is Quebec (but it's not that big)

Sort of a baffling statement. Quebec is gigantic. It would be a top-20 nation, by extent, if it were a nation.

jedberg•5mo ago
Quebec has a lot of empty land. But it does not have a lot of buildable land near plentiful power, super fast internet, and highly skilled technical workers, which are all things you need to build a datacenter.
debian3•5mo ago
There is tons of big power producing electric dams in the middle of nowhere (north of Québec province). It’s also cold most of the year. As far as I know, datacenter doesn’t mean tons of technical workers (except during the building phase). Bringing fiber would not be impossible.
tw04•5mo ago
> Maybe the current admin (which is big on deregulation) will make it easier to build power plants, especially nuclear ones.

They aren’t big on deregulation at all. They’re big on selective regulation. They’re also big on killing any power project that isn’t oil or coal.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-offshore-wind-renewable-ene...

We are in for a painful lesson on why China’s investment in renewables wasn’t just good for their ecology.

boredatoms•5mo ago
There are hydrogen pipelines in texas. There is at least one DC provider using that for power instead of the grid
jdboyd•5mo ago
In m
jdboyd•5mo ago
In my part of PA there are 3 in the process of going in nearby. I think the largest of the 3 is "only" 828 megawatts though. One of the others is supposed to be 300MW, and I'm not sure about the 3rd. There is another group talking about 3 more campuses with a combined power budget of 1.3GW about 55 miles from here. But then while we don't have cheap land, we do have nuclear and hydroelectric in the area, so I guess the makes it attractive.
sghiassy•5mo ago
Curious what you think about Oregon.

Has a lot of hydroelectric and the nights get super-cold, so you could open the roof for free ventilation

bob1029•5mo ago
I think Texas (ERCOT) is a terrible option these days. Meta recently made a fantastic choice by picking Louisiana for their new monster. The MISO grid tends to be cheaper and less volatile than ERCOT.
niemandhier•5mo ago
Energy efficient computing is a very exciting field. I hope it will get more attention driven by these economic constraints.

As a short teaser: Landauers principle suggests that the energy required to erase one bit off information is bounded from below by k_BTln(2). This could lead us down a path towards reversible computing, to avoid energy costs for deleting information.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_computing

wmf•5mo ago
The work started around 10-15 years ago and is now largely done. Many people confuse large absolute numbers like 1 kW with inefficiency but today's GPUs/TPUs are close to the practical efficiency limit with today's 3 nm technology.
estimator7292•5mo ago
I think it's mostly because laypeople think that all heat is wasted heat. Most people are pretty surprised to learn that there's a fundamental energy cost to flip a bit and that there even is a lower limit to the amount of heat generated by a bit flip.
beeflet•5mo ago
I think the problem is that you can't get the chips hot enough to drive an efficient industrial process unless you are using GaN or something.

The carnot cycle on waste heat is bad

adrianN•5mo ago
They might be close to the limit for what they do (I don’t know), but are they close to the limit of what we need them for?
31b3r3t7•5mo ago
Why Nvidia is desperate to get back to China: https://youtu.be/DMVAqABLkxk?si=FsyHMGmGEVPUGAot
tehjoker•5mo ago
What is the point of all this? Why are we using so much power for hallucinated google search?
MadnessASAP•5mo ago
Because, for the time being, people are buying it.
iainctduncan•5mo ago
Well .... investors are funding it. Take those away and nowhere near enough people want the price on the tin.
tehjoker•5mo ago
Even if that were true, that wouldn't be a useful justification. People buy drugs because they are addictive, it's not a rational decision about costs and benefits. Externalities are almost not at all considered in the contract here.
starchild3001•5mo ago
My hunch: we’ll see three things happen in parallel

- AI backend providers vertically integrating into energy production (like xAI’s gas plants, or Meta’s local generation experiments),

- renewed interest in genuinely efficient computing paradigms (e.g. reversible/approximate computing, analog accelerators),

- a political battle over whether AI workloads deserve priority access to power vs. EVs, homes, or manufacturing, alongside an increase in energy prices.

You need cheap, reliable power + political/regulatory willingness + cooling. That’s a very short list of geographies. And even then, power buildout timelines (whether nuclear, gas, or grid-scale solar+batteries) move at "utility speed", which is decades, not quarters. That doesn’t match the cadence of GPU product launches.

pbd•5mo ago
The timing mismatch is crucial - data centers can be built in 12-18 months, but new power generation takes 5-10 years minimum. We're essentially trying to scale AI demand faster than energy infrastructure can physically respond. This creates interesting arbitrage opportunities in power-rich but compute-poor regions.
blackoil•5mo ago
Remove restrictions on solar import from China. 62 GW may sound a large number, but China added 277GW solar in just 2024. They have the surplus capacity and hence cheapest price.
adriand•5mo ago
China installed 3 gigawatts of solar power every day in May: equivalent to building one coal-fired power plant every 8 hours. They are so far ahead of the US on renewables now that even if Trump had not sold out the future of the country to the fossil fuel industry, the US would have been hard-pressed to catch up.
XorNot•5mo ago
This is honestly one of the stupidest things about this sort of policy: solar panels last 20 years and China can't take them away once you have them.

If you're doing something much more valuable with the power, then buying a lot of PV from China makes sense. If you think the panels are being unfairly subsidized then buying a lot of PV from China is effectively having the Chinese government pay you to have cheap power.

There's an enormous difference between being dependent on short term consumable resources,.and acquiring multidecadel productive assets.

The US at all points seems to not understand it's relationship with China at all.

Panzer04•5mo ago
Most people are economically illiterate and don't understand what subsidies actually imply.

They literally only "hurt" you if you have the local industry to harm to begin with. Otherwise, if someone else is paying the subsidy, it gives you a good for cheaper than you could have had otherwise.

The current admin just turns this up to 11 with their ideologically driven nonsense.

xbmcuser•5mo ago
I got down voted when I said China is likely to win the AI race as they are also targeting the other big cost of computing power/energy on another thread. Today solar + BESS is cheaper than coal where as costs for both keep decreasing each year.
mullingitover•5mo ago
One really interesting strategy the US could pursue here would be to heavily tariff solar[1] and just randomly attack wind projects[2]. Just completely self-own itself on the two cheapest energy sources.

It wouldn't make any sense, but it would be provocative, really drive engagement.

[1] https://seia.org/news/solar-tariff-impacts/

[2] https://www.npr.org/2025/08/31/nx-s1-5522943/trump-offshore-...

beeflet•5mo ago
Maybe the tariff could encourage local manufacturing of solar? I have no idea, but I suppose that our local manufacturing could be getting killed by economies of scale abroad.

Or I am overthinking it and solar is something that (D) politicians support so the (R) president tautologically must oppose it. Therefore we must not have nice things

bsder•5mo ago
> Maybe the tariff could encourage local manufacturing of solar?

That's what tariffs do ... if you leave them in place for extended periods of time.

The problem is that nobody is going to bet their business on what the tariffs will be tomorrow when it could be 10x or zero.

Businesses are just going to stop and hold their breath until Trump goes away.

downrightmike•5mo ago
We have tried locally, with huge government backing, but that failed. But since it was an Obama initiative, a new attempt will never be tried.

Farmers make more money from wind turbines on their land than their crop. https://ambrook.com/offrange/farm-finance/there-will-be-wind

And that is stable money, works without rain, which crops don't.

mullingitover•5mo ago
My guess is that the US is sliding into the pattern of ‘corrupt, resource cursed petrostate’ and all the dysfunction that comes with that. What will happen is whatever maximizes fossil fuel revenues, and lots of shiny distractions to prevent this from being scrutinized.
orbisvicis•5mo ago
Ah, finally an acknowledgement that the melting 12VHPWR connectors short-circuiting Nvidia's top-of-the-line hardware, the RTX 4090 and 5090, may finally have economic ramifications. Heh.
worik•5mo ago
Question: Is piping data a long distance more cost effective than energy?

I would have thought so.

If so building data centres near hydro or geothermal plants (I'm from New Zealand where we have a lot of both) would make sense

wmf•5mo ago
Yes, but I think all of that cheap power has been used up already in the US.