Questions for the community: 1. What’s your monthly AI spend? (Including API costs, subscriptions, etc.) 2. Have you changed behavior due to costs? • Reduced usage of premium models? • Switched to cheaper alternatives? • Started batching requests differently? 3. Quality vs. cost tradeoffs — would you accept slightly lower quality (say 10–15% worse) for significantly lower costs (50–70% savings)? 4. Provider switching — do you stick with one provider or mix-and-match based on task complexity? 5. Interface preferences — CLI tools vs. web interfaces for AI coding assistance. What do you prefer and why?
For context, I mainly use AI for: • Code review and debugging • Architecture discussions • Documentation writing • Refactoring assistance • Learning new frameworks/languages
I’m curious if this is becoming a real pain point or if most developers just accept the costs as part of doing business. Are there patterns in how you use AI that could inform smarter spending, or tools/strategies you’ve found to optimize costs without sacrificing too much quality?
Patt_•5mo ago
Don't subscribe to Claude or GPT-4 or Gemini. Instead, go get something like Perplexity or similar tools so that you can have access to all these latest premium AIs (300~600 queries/day) If you're comfortable with copy-pasting back and forth, this one thing meets all your needs.
And on the IDE side, subscribe to only one IDE, And even with IDEs, you can cut down costs, like going for qoder(just came out, free 2 week trial) or Trae (3 bucks a month, you can get that deal ). As for Claude Code, swap in qwen or DeepSeek apis. They're compatible with Claude Code and works ootd.