frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: CryptoClaw – open-source AI agent with built-in wallet and DeFi skills

https://github.com/TermiX-official/cryptoclaw
1•cryptoclaw•3m ago•0 comments

ShowHN: Make OpenClaw Respond in Scarlett Johansson’s AI Voice from the Film Her

https://twitter.com/sathish316/status/2020116849065971815
1•sathish316•5m ago•1 comments

CReact Version 0.3.0 Released

https://github.com/creact-labs/creact
1•_dcoutinho96•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CReact – AI Powered AWS Website Generator

https://github.com/creact-labs/ai-powered-aws-website-generator
1•_dcoutinho96•7m ago•0 comments

The rocky 1960s origins of online dating (2025)

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20250206-the-rocky-1960s-origins-of-online-dating
1•1659447091•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Agent-fetch – Sandboxed HTTP client with SSRF protection for AI agents

https://github.com/Parassharmaa/agent-fetch
1•paraaz•14m ago•0 comments

Why there is no official statement from Substack about the data leak

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/05/substack-confirms-data-breach-affecting-email-addresses-and-pho...
5•witnessme•18m ago•1 comments

Effects of Zepbound on Stool Quality

https://twitter.com/ScottHickle/status/2020150085296775300
2•aloukissas•21m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Seedance 2.0 – The Most Powerful AI Video Generator

https://seedance.ai/
1•bigbromaker•24m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Do we need "metadata in source code" syntax that LLMs will never delete?

1•andrewstuart•30m ago•1 comments

Pentagon cutting ties w/ "woke" Harvard, ending military training & fellowships

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-says-its-cutting-ties-with-woke-harvard-discontinuing-milit...
6•alephnerd•33m ago•2 comments

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? [pdf]

https://cds.cern.ch/record/405662/files/PhysRev.47.777.pdf
1•northlondoner•33m ago•1 comments

Kessler Syndrome Has Started [video]

https://www.tiktok.com/@cjtrowbridge/video/7602634355160206623
2•pbradv•36m ago•0 comments

Complex Heterodynes Explained

https://tomverbeure.github.io/2026/02/07/Complex-Heterodyne.html
4•hasheddan•36m ago•0 comments

EVs Are a Failed Experiment

https://spectator.org/evs-are-a-failed-experiment/
3•ArtemZ•48m ago•5 comments

MemAlign: Building Better LLM Judges from Human Feedback with Scalable Memory

https://www.databricks.com/blog/memalign-building-better-llm-judges-human-feedback-scalable-memory
1•superchink•49m ago•0 comments

CCC (Claude's C Compiler) on Compiler Explorer

https://godbolt.org/z/asjc13sa6
2•LiamPowell•51m ago•0 comments

Homeland Security Spying on Reddit Users

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/homeland-security-spies-on-reddit
9•duxup•53m ago•1 comments

Actors with Tokio (2021)

https://ryhl.io/blog/actors-with-tokio/
1•vinhnx•55m ago•0 comments

Can graph neural networks for biology realistically run on edge devices?

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8645211/v1
1•swapinvidya•1h ago•1 comments

Deeper into the shareing of one air conditioner for 2 rooms

1•ozzysnaps•1h ago•0 comments

Weatherman introduces fruit-based authentication system to combat deep fakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HVbZwJ9gPE
3•savrajsingh•1h ago•0 comments

Why Embedded Models Must Hallucinate: A Boundary Theory (RCC)

http://www.effacermonexistence.com/rcc-hn-1-1
1•formerOpenAI•1h ago•2 comments

A Curated List of ML System Design Case Studies

https://github.com/Engineer1999/A-Curated-List-of-ML-System-Design-Case-Studies
3•tejonutella•1h ago•0 comments

Pony Alpha: New free 200K context model for coding, reasoning and roleplay

https://ponyalpha.pro
1•qzcanoe•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Tunbot – Discord bot for temporary Cloudflare tunnels behind CGNAT

https://github.com/Goofygiraffe06/tunbot
2•g1raffe•1h ago•0 comments

Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability

https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16496
2•vinhnx•1h ago•0 comments

Bye Bye Humanity: The Potential AMOC Collapse

https://thatjoescott.com/2026/02/03/bye-bye-humanity-the-potential-amoc-collapse/
3•rolph•1h ago•0 comments

Dexter: Claude-Code-Style Agent for Financial Statements and Valuation

https://github.com/virattt/dexter
1•Lwrless•1h ago•0 comments

Digital Iris [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg_2MAgS_pE
1•vermilingua•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

A venture capitalist goes to extremes to punish her surrogate

https://www.wired.com/story/the-baby-died-whose-fault-is-it-surrogate-pregnancy/
51•MattGrommes•5mo ago

Comments

pinewurst•5mo ago
https://archive.ph/oO0p7
KittenInABox•5mo ago
As someone who is not in the world of surrogacy: how much control does someone typically have over a surrogate during the pregnancy? Also what are you supposed to do in the event a surrogate has irreparable harm like losing a uterus or death?
tuckerman•5mo ago
> how much control does someone typically have over a surrogate during the pregnancy

Very little, ultimately the healthcare the surrogate is receiving is _her_ healthcare.

> what are you supposed to do in the event a surrogate has irreparable harm

These things are spelled out in the contract that the IPs have with their surrogate. Both things you mention are specifically called in our contract and the agency/IPs usually have insurance to cover these cases.

Source: I had my son through surrogacy

bigbadfeline•5mo ago
> how much control does someone typically have over a surrogate during the pregnancy?

The original article makes it clear: The product is fully controlled all the way to "The Island" [1]

And that is achieved not by direct legislation but by the lack of it. That lack is filled by contract law and an expensive, convoluted legal system which puts the surrogates in a precariously vulnerable position.

>> tuckerman: Very little [control], ultimately the healthcare the surrogate is receiving is _her_ healthcare.

That means, if something goes wrong the surrogates are stuck with med bills too, in addition to the legal ones.

[1] "The Island" 2005, recommended viewing, the movie might be available on big tube.

tuckerman•5mo ago
> That means, if something goes wrong the surrogates are stuck with med bills too, in addition to the legal ones.

This is not true.

Our contract, which was extremely standard, made us assume all medical expenses related to the pregnancy, including any complications that could have occurred afterwards. If anything happened to her health insurance coverage we would have also had to pay for premiums for new coverage.

bigbadfeline•5mo ago
Good for you, but not all contracts are like that, as is the case in the orig article. I'm not concerned about individual cases but about systemic risks.
tuckerman•5mo ago
The original comment asked what is typical, I am commenting what is typical.

What you describe would be extremely atypical and I can’t imagine any lawyer representing a surrogate would allow that to stand. It’s also nearly universal for IPs to cover legal fees for the surrogate to have an independent representation.

California, as an example, has laws mandating that IPs and Surrogates have separate attorneys for the process. I think most supporters of surrogacy would approve of common sense laws like that everywhere but even without them it’s very standard.

bigbadfeline•5mo ago
> What you describe would be extremely atypical

Well, we're commenting on an article describing such a case and there's no study telling us that it's atypical.

> I can’t imagine any lawyer representing a surrogate would allow that to stand.

Well, I can and I'd rather nor leave it to the imagination.

I understand surrogate clients, but many of them don't seem to understand that taking a narrow, egoistical view and wanting all options available to them actually limits the pool of willing surrogates. One of the many cases where greed works against itself and needs correcting nudges from the law.

TrackerFF•5mo ago
So I read the whole story...this Bi character sounds like every bad Silicon Valley yuppie stereotype rolled into one, with a big dose of legit mental illness. The lady sounded extremely manic. Don't know if it is just rage bait, but sure worked that way.
FireBeyond•5mo ago
Absolutely. It was escalating through the story, but this paragraph nailed it:

> She also hired psychics to give her answers. As she tells it, they all blamed Smith. One suggested that an ex-boyfriend of Smith’s had turned her against Baby Leon. Another claimed to see traumas on Smith’s belly and said she was clearly having rough sex. He warned: “She has something to hide.” When Smith refused to release her medical records unless nonpregnancy information was redacted, Bi saw it as confirmation that Smith was hiding crucial details.

What in living fuck do psychics have to do with a surrogacy process?

Also, this:

> SAI countered that there was “no documented bleed” on the date in question but clarified that there was “some light pink fluid which the doctor was not concerned about.” SAI said Smith asked the doctors to tell Bi directly, and that the contract gave Smith two weeks to tell Bi. “That’s emergency information,” Bi said. “She should have told me right away.”

You're going to have a hard time convincing a court that an obstetrician noted, and was unconcerned about something but that you believe it was "emergency information".

> If Bi had been told, she believed that Leon would be alive. She would’ve insisted on a C-section immediately.

A layperson insisting on a C-section at what would have been ... 27-28 weeks gestation? Where viability is ~70% at best? There's so much to poke at there. Ostensibly, Bi had a contract with the surrogacy agency that "guaranteed" a "well baby". One, who writes that contract? And seems to me the mere act of "insisting" on a C-section (which let's also be clear, has a risk to the mother, though lower) at that gestation would be at odds with any "guarantees".

quickthrowman•5mo ago
It’s an interesting tale of what happens when you have enough wealth to insulate you from the insane decisions that a manic episode can generate. An ‘average’ person pursuing this sort of harassment campaign would end up institutionalized, at least temporarily. They would at least have someone tell them straight up that they need help, something this woman has probably never had to face (at least since being wealthy)

I feel bad for this woman, she’s trapped in a manic prison by having enough wealth to turn everyone into enablers. I’ve seen active mania and how it affects decision making and the perception of reality in the people suffering under it. I’d much prefer a lack of guardrails nudging me towards treatment instead of wealth enabling me to engage in a public campaign of harassment.

Sometimes a lack of consequences is more debilitating than facing the consequences of your actions, if facing those consequences can set you on a better path, something I’ve learned from personal experience with chemical addiction. I used to do a lot of drugs, and so did Zappos founder Tony Hsieh. The main difference between him and I is that I eventually ran out of money and had people attempt to talk some sense into me instead of enabling me to death, something which I am very thankful for today.

Nevermark•5mo ago
I appreciate the point you are making.

I had someone save me. Not from my own behavior, but from the mental health collapse I suffered, after the bizarre and damaging choices of someone else completely undid me and my circumstances. My gratitude to the person who held onto me until I could start mending will never fade.

I am very glad you also had good people there for you. We all need those people.

> I feel bad for this woman

But it's a little difficult to feel sympathy for this lady. She is relentlessly destroying a vulnerable persons life, who already had her own grief and health repercussions to deal with. As her husband who openly disagrees with her puts it, as part of her "grieving" process.

I hope this situation ends with legal justice that reflects the realities.

Given Cindy Bi is on her way to becoming famous, it won't be as unidirectional from here.

occamsrazorwit•5mo ago
It's also not just her wealth but her personality. For better or for worse, someone as headstrong as her attracts a certain type of person, and the article showed that even her own husband was afraid of getting involved...

> Bi’s husband focused on stabilizing the family, a move he credits with saving their marriage. He blamed the hospital, not Smith, but told me that the litigation is “her grieving process.” He tried to stay out of the legal stuff so that Bi couldn’t blame him too.

I honestly feel bad for the family, because I've heard many stories about this type of familial dynamic from children who grew up inside them...

saxelsen•5mo ago
This story sounds like the worst consequence of American liberalism and capitalism in one.

This would be a hit TV show on par with Baby Reindeer, if it was ever televised.

techopop•5mo ago
This has nothing to do with liberalism. Money thinking it has dominion over others. Eugenics, creating databases of wombs and controlling what a woman does with her body. That is all right out of the republican playbook. Look up Peter Theil and palantir, Vance’s maker. Same old story, new tech bro faces.
FireBeyond•5mo ago
I've made plenty of remarks already but this got me:

> [Bi's husband] blamed the hospital, not Smith, but told me that the litigation is “her grieving process.” He tried to stay out of the legal stuff so that Bi couldn’t blame him too.

How utterly fucking sociopathic do you have to be to sue (and not just sue, she's angling to try to have the surrogate charged with murder) as part of your grieving process. Fuck the single mom trying to help you, you don't care, as a multimillionaire VC.

Even her husband is scared, to the point he's on record as saying he doesn't want his wife blaming him for the surrogacy loss? There are a multitude of issues here.

> Next, Bi iMessaged a photo of Leon’s corpse to Smith’s 7-year-old son’s iPad.

Oh, this kind of fucking sociopath.

> Bi isn’t anti-surrogacy—in fact, she frequently advises other investors who are pursuing it and sends me links to startup after startup

Coming up next, the next unicorn, funded by this VC to help control every moment of your surrogate's life.

This is a really good read on this story: https://www.fridaythings.com/recent-posts/wired-surrogacy-ci...

> The couple hired a second surrogate to carry a fetus for them, this one a girl who’s now 11 months old. Bi characterized that pregnancy as easy and smooth to Nietfeld. In fact, the surrogate, Chelsea Sanabria, had gestational diabetes and both placenta previa and placenta accreta. During delivery, she hemorrhaged, losing 5.4 litres of blood. She needed an emergency hysterectomy to literally save her life. Imagine how little you have to care about another person to characterize that as ‘easy.’

geephroh•5mo ago
Among all the incredibly depressing and shitty stories about late-stage capitalist consumer culture I've heard, this has to be one of the most depressing and shittiest.
homeonthemtn•5mo ago
This is a fever dream of a nightmare.

It's like mixing teams chat work culture with pregnancy. Just a giant bizarre wtf.