You can achieve these higher resolutions, fidelity and close to 100% reproduction of objects with considerable effort in generative AI right now, it's even a very enjoyable experience to do so, but not with a closed model like Nano Banana. When Google or other major image model providers give us proper fine tuning and custom inference, particularly for applications like upscaling, then we can have a serious conversation.
At present, while I understand the fascination, everyone should take a step back and consider what we're actually trying to replace. We are stuck at these low inference resolutions since SDXL. For genuine high-end commercial applications, we're not there yet, and we won't be without another significant leap in GPU technology.
also, recently i saw a dubbed commercial, so it's already rock bottom.
image is not like coding. you don't get hacked with a shitty commercial or something. you can live with 80%
400M pix shot of a genetic banana replaced by a 400M pix synthetic shot of a reputed banana, multiplied by Youtube channel mansplaining the finer points of reputed banana synthesis.
The only thing missing is any interest whatsoever in actual bananas!
Take career notes kids, as the AI bandwagon is determined to exhaust the entire world and stuff its remains along with cases of Dom Pérignon down into bomb shelter made from an abandoned nuclear missile silo for the benefit of a VC and his "Tech Support" bros by reputing everything the same way it's reputed the banana.
fallinditch•5mo ago
[1] https://www.mes-appareils-photos.fr/Zeiss-Ikon-Nettar-517-16...