frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

India's Sarvan AI LLM launches Indic-language focused models

https://x.com/SarvamAI
1•Osiris30•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CryptoClaw – open-source AI agent with built-in wallet and DeFi skills

https://github.com/TermiX-official/cryptoclaw
1•cryptoclaw•4m ago•0 comments

ShowHN: Make OpenClaw Respond in Scarlett Johansson’s AI Voice from the Film Her

https://twitter.com/sathish316/status/2020116849065971815
1•sathish316•6m ago•1 comments

CReact Version 0.3.0 Released

https://github.com/creact-labs/creact
1•_dcoutinho96•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CReact – AI Powered AWS Website Generator

https://github.com/creact-labs/ai-powered-aws-website-generator
1•_dcoutinho96•8m ago•0 comments

The rocky 1960s origins of online dating (2025)

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20250206-the-rocky-1960s-origins-of-online-dating
1•1659447091•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Agent-fetch – Sandboxed HTTP client with SSRF protection for AI agents

https://github.com/Parassharmaa/agent-fetch
1•paraaz•15m ago•0 comments

Why there is no official statement from Substack about the data leak

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/05/substack-confirms-data-breach-affecting-email-addresses-and-pho...
5•witnessme•19m ago•1 comments

Effects of Zepbound on Stool Quality

https://twitter.com/ScottHickle/status/2020150085296775300
2•aloukissas•22m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Seedance 2.0 – The Most Powerful AI Video Generator

https://seedance.ai/
2•bigbromaker•25m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Do we need "metadata in source code" syntax that LLMs will never delete?

1•andrewstuart•31m ago•1 comments

Pentagon cutting ties w/ "woke" Harvard, ending military training & fellowships

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-says-its-cutting-ties-with-woke-harvard-discontinuing-milit...
6•alephnerd•34m ago•2 comments

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? [pdf]

https://cds.cern.ch/record/405662/files/PhysRev.47.777.pdf
1•northlondoner•34m ago•1 comments

Kessler Syndrome Has Started [video]

https://www.tiktok.com/@cjtrowbridge/video/7602634355160206623
2•pbradv•37m ago•0 comments

Complex Heterodynes Explained

https://tomverbeure.github.io/2026/02/07/Complex-Heterodyne.html
4•hasheddan•37m ago•0 comments

EVs Are a Failed Experiment

https://spectator.org/evs-are-a-failed-experiment/
3•ArtemZ•49m ago•5 comments

MemAlign: Building Better LLM Judges from Human Feedback with Scalable Memory

https://www.databricks.com/blog/memalign-building-better-llm-judges-human-feedback-scalable-memory
1•superchink•50m ago•0 comments

CCC (Claude's C Compiler) on Compiler Explorer

https://godbolt.org/z/asjc13sa6
2•LiamPowell•52m ago•0 comments

Homeland Security Spying on Reddit Users

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/homeland-security-spies-on-reddit
12•duxup•54m ago•1 comments

Actors with Tokio (2021)

https://ryhl.io/blog/actors-with-tokio/
1•vinhnx•56m ago•0 comments

Can graph neural networks for biology realistically run on edge devices?

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8645211/v1
1•swapinvidya•1h ago•1 comments

Deeper into the shareing of one air conditioner for 2 rooms

1•ozzysnaps•1h ago•0 comments

Weatherman introduces fruit-based authentication system to combat deep fakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HVbZwJ9gPE
3•savrajsingh•1h ago•0 comments

Why Embedded Models Must Hallucinate: A Boundary Theory (RCC)

http://www.effacermonexistence.com/rcc-hn-1-1
1•formerOpenAI•1h ago•2 comments

A Curated List of ML System Design Case Studies

https://github.com/Engineer1999/A-Curated-List-of-ML-System-Design-Case-Studies
3•tejonutella•1h ago•0 comments

Pony Alpha: New free 200K context model for coding, reasoning and roleplay

https://ponyalpha.pro
1•qzcanoe•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Tunbot – Discord bot for temporary Cloudflare tunnels behind CGNAT

https://github.com/Goofygiraffe06/tunbot
2•g1raffe•1h ago•0 comments

Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability

https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16496
2•vinhnx•1h ago•0 comments

Bye Bye Humanity: The Potential AMOC Collapse

https://thatjoescott.com/2026/02/03/bye-bye-humanity-the-potential-amoc-collapse/
3•rolph•1h ago•0 comments

Dexter: Claude-Code-Style Agent for Financial Statements and Valuation

https://github.com/virattt/dexter
1•Lwrless•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

My Vercel v0 weekend: A working app, a happy friend, and a $50 bill

3•ryado•5mo ago
I'm an experienced backend engineer; frontend has always been my bottleneck. I've been experimenting with AI tools to bridge this gap, and my recent experience with Vercel v0 was notable.

Fueled by a desire to impress a friend (and some alcohol) last weekend, I built a feature-rich internal app for his business; ~ think a feature-rich time tracker with auth, roles, export, etc. To keep the momentum going, I bypassed the rate limits and spent about $50 on a Pro sub and credits over two days. The result: a working MVP delivered and in use by Monday.

The speed was incredible, not just code generation, but the entire dev-to-deploy cycle. v0 instantly solved the "blank canvas" problem for me.

The sober question now is: was that the best use of $50? The backend I could have built in a similar timeframe, so the value was entirely in accelerating the UI/design for me.

I'm trying to assess the landscape of tools for developers like me. My research so far:

Claude: Intrigued, but pricing is unclear.

Copilot: I use it daily at work for backend, but it feels weak for generating complex, well-designed UI components.

v0 vs. Bolt: v0 felt miles ahead for the initial UI generation.

My question for HN:

For a developer whose main weakness is frontend design, is there anything that truly matches v0's 0-to-1 speed right now? Or is it in a class of its own, and the ~$50 cost for an MVP is simply the new price of admission for this kind of leverage in my case?

I think v0 is an amazing product, but I'm pragmatic about tools. I’ve just learned to treat companies the same way they treat customers: always squeeze the juice, move on when the value drops.

Curious to hear what workflows others have found effective.

Comments

ryado•5mo ago
Author here. This really boils down to an ROI question.

On one hand, a $50 cash outlay for a validated MVP that's in the hands of users within 48 hours seems like an incredibly good deal from a business perspective.

On the other, my engineering brain is asking if 90% of the same result could be achieved for $10 (a Copilot sub) and just a few more hours of effort.

I'm especially interested to hear from others who build side projects or MVPs: *How do you evaluate the cost of these 'pay-per-generation' AI tools versus traditional flat-rate subscriptions in your budget?*

bryanrasmussen•5mo ago
>On the other, my engineering brain is asking if 90% of the same result could be achieved for $10 (a Copilot sub) and just a few more hours of effort.

my engineering brain is asking:

does "few more hours of effort" mean 2 more hours of effort?

If so do you get paid less than $20 per hour?

If few more hours of effort means more than 2 how many more hours of effort do you think it would have to be for it to be ridiculous for making that effort?

ryado•5mo ago
I see what you mean, and had the same thought while I wrote this comment.

Here is the catch, something like copilot is a month subscription.

V0 is pay by usage, and in my small sample size we talking > +$20/day vs $XX / month (20 or 200 idk)

bryanrasmussen•5mo ago
sure, but you're still stuck with the fact that with copilot, according to the rules you have put out, you are losing money with each thing you do, assuming you have to do a few hours more each time.

On the other hand do you have the liquidity to do it all with just v0?

For example I don't really have the liquidity right now to do anything other than free tiers.

amacalac•5mo ago
$50 to move past your bottleneck? I’d say that’s worth a fortune in ROI if you had:

a) poor design sense; b) poor design engineering (you have good design sense but can’t figure out how to build it); c) taken more than your hourly salary to learn a + b.

Agree with understanding if you could do it cheaper and faster next time, but the rule of 3 usually applies: “good, fast and cheap, pick 2”

It looks like you’re on the right track; pragmatism about specific tools, and their use cases.

Hopefully your friend sees the value in the tool and a big ROI too!