I used to work on payment infrastructure and whenever a vendor offered us the choice between CSV and some other format we always opted for that other format (often xlsx). This sounds a bit weird, but when using xlsx and a good library for handling it, you never have to worry about encoding, escaping and number formatting.
This is one of these things that sound absolutely wrong from an engineering standpoint (xlsx is abhorrently complex on the inside), but works robustly in practice.
Slightly related: This was a German company, with EU and US payment providers. Also note that Microsoft Excel (and therefore a lot of other tools) produces "semicolon-separated values" files when started on a computer with the locale set to German...
I tried using them once after what felt like an aeon of quoting issues, and the first customer file I had had them randomly appearing in their fields.
I work a lot with time series data, and excel does not support datetimes with timezones, so I have to figure out the timezone every time to align with other sources of data.
Reading and writing them is much slower than csv, which is annoying when datasets get larger.
And most importantly, xlsx are way more often fucked up in some way than any other format. Usually, because somebody manually did something to them and sometimes because the library used to write them had some hiccup.
So I guess a hot take indeed.
Which good libraries did you find? That's been my pain point when dealing with xlsx.
On the technical side libraries like pandas have undergone extreme selection pressure to be able to read in Excel's weird CSV choices without breaking. At that point we have the luxury of writing them out as "proper" CSV, or as a SQLite database, or as whatever else we care about. It's just a reasonable crossing-over point.
https://medium.com/@ManueleCaddeo/understanding-jsonl-bc8922...
Use tabs as a delimiter and excel interops with the format as if natively.
Everyone uses , or ; as delimiters and then uses either . or , for decimals, depending on the source.
It shouldnt be so hard to auto-detect these different formats, but somehow in 2025, Excel still cannot do it.
For whatever reason, pipe seems to be support common in health care data.
Most arguments for or against one apply to all.
It clearly means CSV must be doing something right.
(there are some limitations)
COL1,COL2,COL3
5,"+A2&C1","+A2*8&B1"Yes, it does. When Excel is installed, it installs a file type association for CSV and Explorer sets Excel as the default handler.
Add cout or printf lines, which on each iteration print out relevant intermediate values separated by commas, with the first cell being a constant tag. Provided you don't overdo it, the software will typically still run in real-time. Pipe stdout to a file.
After the fact, you can then use grep to filter tags to select which intermediate results you want to analyse. This filtered data can be loaded into a spreadsheet, or read into a higher level script for analysis/debugging/plotting/... In this way you can reproducibly visualise internal operation over a long period of time and see infrequent or subtle deviations from expected behaviour.
(TSV FTW)
YAML is a pain because it has every so slightly different versions, that sometimes don't play nice.
csv or TSV's are almost always portable.
It's unkillable, like many eldritch horrors.
> The specification of CSV holds in its title: "comma separated values". Okay, it's a lie, but still, the specification holds in a tweet and can be explained to anybody in seconds: commas separate values, new lines separate rows. Now quote values containing commas and line breaks, double your quotes, and that's it. This is so simple you might even invent it yourself without knowing it already exists while learning how to program.
Except that's just one way people do it. It's not universal and so you cannot take arbitrary CSV files in and parse them like this. You can't take a CSV file constructed like this and pass it into any CSV accepting program - many will totally break.
> Of course it does not mean you should not use a dedicated CSV parser/writer because you will mess something up.
Yes, implementers often have.
> No one owns CSV. It has no real specification
Yep. So all these monstrosities in the real world are all... maybe valid? Lots of totally broken CSV files can be parsed as CSV but the result is wrong. Sometimes subtly.
> This means, by extension, that it can both be read and edited by humans directly, somehow.
One of the very common ways they get completely fucked up, yes. Someone goes and sorts some rows and boom broken, often unrecoverable data loss. Someone doesn't correctly add or remove a comma. Someone mixes two files that actually have differently encoded text.
> CSV can be read row by row very easily without requiring more memory than what is needed to fit a single row.
CSV must be parsed row by row.
> By comparison, column-oriented data formats such as parquet are not able to stream files row by row without requiring you to jump here and there in the file or to buffer the memory cleverly so you don't tank read performance.
Sort of? Yes if you're building your own parser but who is doing that? It's also not hard with things like parquet.
> But of course, CSV is terrible if you are only interested in specific columns because you will indeed need to read all of a row only to access the part you are interested in.
Or if you're interested in a specific row, because you're going to have to be careful about parsing out every row until you get there.
CSV does not have a row separator. Or rather it does but it also lets you have that row separator appear and not mean "separate these rows" so you can't simply trust it.
> But critics of CSV coming from this set of pratices tend to only care about use-cases where everything is expected to fit into memory.
Parquet uses row groups which means you can stream chunks easily, those chunks contain metadata so you can easily filter rows you don't need too.
I much more often need to keep the whole thing in memory working with CSV than parquet. With parquet I don't even need to be able to fit all the rows on disk I can read the chunk I want remotely.
> CSV can be appended to
Yeah that's easier. Row groups means you can still do this though, but granted it's not as easy. *However* I will point out that absolutely nothing stops someone completely borking things by appending something that's not exactly the right format.
> CSV is dynamically typed
Not really. Everything is strings. You can do that with anything else if you want to. JSON can have numbers of any size if you just store them as strings.
> CSV is succinct
Yes, more so than jsonl, but not really more than (you guessed it) parquet. Also it's horrific for compression.
> Reverse CSV is still valid CSV
Get a file format that doesn't absolutely suck and you can parse things in reverse if you want. More usefully you can parse just sections you actually care about!
> Excel hates CSV
Helpfully this just means that the most popular way of working with tabular data in the world doesn't play that nicely with it.
Partially due to the bloat, but also partially because the format doesn't allow for speed.
And because CSV is untyped, you have to either trust the producer or put in mountains of guards to ensure you can handle the weird garbage that might come through.
My company deals with a lot of CSV and we literally built tools and hire multiple full time employees whose entire job is handling CSV sucking in new and interesting ways.
Parquet literally eliminates 1/2 of our our data ingestion pipeline simply by being typed, consistent, and fast to query.
One example of a problem we constantly run into is that nobody likes to format numbers the same way. Scientific notation, no scientific notation, commas or periods, sometimes mixed formats (scientific notation when a number is big enough, for example).
Escaping is also all over the board.
CSV SEEMS simple, but the lack of a real standard means it's anything but.
I'd take xml over CSV.
Smart people (that have been burned once too many times) put quotes around fields in csv if they aren’t 100% positive the field will be comma-free, and escape quotes in such fields.
Indeed, a lie only a lover would believe,,,
I wouldn't write it a love letter though. There's a reason that parquet exists.
Without more specifics, I disagree with your take.
Going from tool to tool will leave you with widely different representations of the original data you've put in. Because as you said yourself. All of this data does not have any meaning. It's just strings. The csv and the tools do not care if one column was ms-epoch and another was mathematical notation floating point. It'll all just go through that specific tools deserialization - serialization mangle and you'll have completely different data on the other end.
If the CSV is not written by me it's always been an exercise in making things as difficult as possible. It might be a tad smaller as a format but I find the parsing to be so ass you need really good reason to use it.
Edit: Oh yeah, and some have a header, others don't and CSV seems to always come from some machine where the techs can come over to do an update, and just reorder everything because fuck your parsing and then you either get lucky and the parser dies, or since you don't really have much info the types just align and you start saving garbage data to your database until a domain expert notices something isn't quite right so you have to find when was the last time someone touched the machines and rollback/reparse everything..
Back in the early 2000s I designed and built a custom data collector for a air force project. It saved data at 100 Hz on an SD card. The project manager loved it! He could pop the SD card out or use the handy USB mass storage mode to grab the csv files.
The only problem... Why did the data cut off after about 10 minutes?? I couldn't see the actual data collected since it was secret, but I had no issue on my end, assuming there was space on the card and battery life was good.
Turns out, I learned he was using excel 2003 to open the csv file. There is a 65,536 row limit (does that number look familiar?). That took a while to figure out!!
ayhanfuat•2h ago
708 points | 5 months ago | 698 comments (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43484382)