frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: ArtifyAi – AI Text-to-Image Tool by 30 image models models

https://artifyai.app/
1•dahuangf•13m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How to Explain Gap in Resume?

2•shivajikobardan•26m ago•3 comments

Apple pays out over claims it deliberately slowed down iPhones (2024)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67911517
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•29m ago•0 comments

Mortuary rites of the South Fore and kuru

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2581657/
1•0xWTF•31m ago•0 comments

Klarna employees roast return-to-office plan with emojis as IPO hits the market

https://www.businessinsider.com/klarna-office-return-employee-reaction-emojis-ipo-rto-2025-9
4•doctaj•35m ago•2 comments

Watch What You Say: Review of Books on Free Speech

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2025/09/25/watch-what-you-say-what-is-free-speech/
1•mitchbob•35m ago•1 comments

The War App: Review of Karp and Zamiska's The Technological Republic

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2025/09/25/the-war-app-the-technological-republic-karp-zamiska/
1•mitchbob•37m ago•1 comments

Challenges of maintaining software in customer AWS environments?

https://www.kyva.ai/
1•Prophessor_Sean•43m ago•1 comments

Writing app that deletes your text when you stop typing

https://www.neverstoptyping.com
3•jack_lynch•44m ago•1 comments

AI can't be woke and regulators should be asleep, Senator Cruz says

https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/10/ai_cruz_sandbox/
2•ofrzeta•44m ago•0 comments

The biggest chat app in Korea is a roleplaying bot

https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10572091
1•sbinnee•45m ago•1 comments

The Superyacht, the Billionaire, and a Wildly Improbable Disaster at Sea

https://www.wired.com/story/mike-lynch-sinking-disaster/
2•tysone•46m ago•0 comments

Christie's Will Auction the First Calculating Machine in History

https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/christies-auction-first-calculating-machine-blaise-pascal-1...
1•vmbrasseur•47m ago•0 comments

Fill Harmonics, the crossword puzzle music machine

https://parkerhiggins.net/2025/09/fill-harmonics-crossword-music-machine/
1•CharlesW•51m ago•0 comments

New ImprovMX Features in 2025

https://improvmx.com/blog/new-features-2025
2•matthewtse•58m ago•1 comments

Linting for Your Docs

https://github.com/a24z-ai/a24z-memory
3•fernandoramlugo•59m ago•0 comments

Posthog – I use them because of their fun website design

https://posthog.com/
1•Brajeshwar•1h ago•0 comments

Squaring the Square

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squaring_the_square
1•tzury•1h ago•0 comments

Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (24-1733) [pdf]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.3faa6ebe-fa32-ef11-a296-001dd804fa85/gov...
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•0 comments

NASA finds best evidence of life on Mars so far

https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/10/nasa_best_evidence_life_on_mars/
2•s3graham•1h ago•0 comments

Compact AI Formula?

1•f_of_t•1h ago•0 comments

Does Society Have Too Many Rules?

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/open-questions/does-society-have-too-many-rules
2•Caiero•1h ago•1 comments

Rust compiler performance survey 2025 results

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/09/10/rust-compiler-performance-survey-2025-results/
1•Bogdanp•1h ago•0 comments

Heliolens

https://heliolens.builtbyvibes.com/
1•watkajtys•1h ago•0 comments

My (speculative) master plan for immortality

https://maxwellnye.com/plan/
2•jxmorris12•1h ago•0 comments

ESP32-based boundary wire signal generator for Robomow RX/RT mowers

https://github.com/eelcogg/robomow-signal-generator
3•MBCook•1h ago•0 comments

Massively Parallel Agentic Simulations with Ray

https://www.anyscale.com/blog/massively-parallel-agentic-simulations-with-ray
2•robertnishihara•1h ago•0 comments

Anton Flettner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Flettner
2•domofutu•1h ago•0 comments

Sodium Ion Battery Tech Hits the Auto Industry – Are We Ready? [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqb7YtR7K4g
3•sixplusone•1h ago•2 comments

'Ghost Ship' Sails

https://www.popsci.com/technology/green-shipping-rotor-sails-history/
1•wjb3•1h ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Seoul says US must fix its visa system if it wants Korea's investments

https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/1218025.html
167•garbawarb•2h ago

Comments

deepsquirrelnet•1h ago
I don’t think parading out engineers in shackles for a photo op was a good idea.

From another article:

> Images of South Koreans being shackled at the wrists and ankles have caused outrage in South Korea, a key U.S. ally in Asia that has pledged hundreds of billions in U.S. investment as part of tariff negotiations.

It’s just not smart, not good politics and not good business.

MBCook•1h ago
> It’s just not smart, not good politics and not good business.

So in other words SOP

malcolmgreaves•24m ago
*SOP for Republicans whenever they get ahold of government.
standardUser•1h ago
Police in the US are way too quick to handcuff people. It should be reserved for violent or aggressive suspects, or at least require formal justification as is required in much of Europe. Police here will take a calm and cooperative person and rob them of their most fundamental human right, merely as a convenience.
scotty79•36m ago
It's hard to tell if handling cooperative person in handcuffs is more convenient than without handcuffs.
dd36•1h ago
It’s good for the fossil fuel industry and that’s why it was done.
JumpCrisscross•1h ago
> It’s good for the fossil fuel industry and that’s why it was done

How? (I’m really trying here.)

triceratops•41m ago
They raided a battery manufacturing facility. That's what I guess GP meant.
jfengel•1h ago
It may not be smart or good business but it's great politics. It's easy to blame foreigners for any perceived wrong, especially if they're breaking the rules. Your constituents believe that you're setting things right.

It will undoubtedly have negative financial effect on those same constituents, but there's always someone else to arrest and take the blame. It's fantastic politics.

seanmcdirmid•1h ago
Even if they aren’t breaking the rules, you just make your visa policies complicated enough that you can say they might be breaking rules and your constituents will just eat it all up. Meanwhile South Korea decides getting closer to China might be the better course of action.
ProAm•1h ago
If I were Hyundai and had the cash to spare I would close and tear down the facility.
sleepyguy•59m ago
ICE has bravely rescued us from the menace of people building battery factories. Forget fentanyl, trafficking, or violent crime—our real existential threat was clearly a few Korean engineers with power tools. Obviously, they were biding their time before graduating to cartel kingpins. And thank heavens the plant won’t be finished—who actually wants it and the jobs, infrastructure, etc it would bring.

Sleep well, folks—America is saved, one deported factory worker at a time.

Scoundreller•18m ago
The bit that gets me is another country is kinda handing over its technology to USA, so why get in the way?

When US engineers went to China to offshore US factories there, I doubt China got in the way. Probably watched with heavy interest but definitely not hindered in any way.

lvspiff•45m ago
It feels like this was more done initially to meet a quota. Lady reports to ICE she thinks illegals working there. ICE does some sorta check and realized there might be an issue with a couple and extrapolated it to all Asians working in the facility. Saw a big juicy chance to roll out the team and detain a ton of people thinking it make Bondi and Trump happy. Now Trump is stuck looking weak to Koreans (and in turn china and India) or weak to his base depending on who he sides with which right now looks to be his base.
dfxm12•42m ago
It was probably good for white nationalists like Trump, his party and their voters though. They also don't seem to be interested in doing what's best for business.
robbingtherob•6m ago
What's best for business? Enlighten us oh Czsar of Business Methodology! (Importing lots of cheap, diverse culture labor with relaxed immigration rules? Okay, just look at UK)
__turbobrew__•1h ago
Has anyone disputed the validity of the visas of the workers which were deported? My understanding is that SK citizens cannot get E-4, so people came to the US and worked on a visa that didn’t allow working, and the US deported the people violating visa rules in a not nice way?

Im guessing this is the case or else the SK sources would be calling out that these workers were following visa rules?

Simulacra•1h ago
It was a clear violation, the rest of this is just posturing for politics. Most of the people had come on the wrong visa, knowingly. So either the company lied, or the employees are lying, or both.
a_bonobo•1h ago
>Leaked Ice document shows worker detained in Hyundai raid had valid visa

>At least one of the Korean workers swept up in a huge immigration raid on a Hyundai Motor factory site in Georgia last week was living and working legally in the US, according to an internal federal government document obtained by the Guardian.

>Officials then “mandated” that he agree to be removed from the US despite not having violated his visa.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/hyundai-fact...

like_any_other•1h ago
"worker", singular. And the rest?
sinuhe69•1h ago
Is the blatant violation of the rights and dignity of at least one person not alarming enough for you? Shouldn't the rights of individuals be respected? And can a society that willingly turns a blind eye to such incidents still be called a constitutional state?
like_any_other•42m ago
I don't entirely disagree with your position, but I'd still like to know. Or to put it another way:

When the media so blatantly cherry-pick what they choose to report and what they turn a blind eye to, can such a misinformed society really be called a democracy?

themaninthedark•47m ago
>According to the file written by an agent with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), an agency within Ice, the man entered the US “with a valid B1/B2 visa”, which allows for some business-related activities and tourism. He was at the Hyundai factory as a contractor with a South Korean company.

I did some research on B1/B2 Visa's it looks like the work allowed is rather restricted. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45207369

keepamovin•1h ago
Exactly! But now they’re going to claim special treatment, avoid responsibility, and show their true attitudes beneath the surface: they don’t respect you or your laws.

This is not caused by Trump; its latent attitude being surfaced.

viraptor•1h ago
> It was a clear violation

Can you show us the proof?

> Most of the people had come on the wrong visa

Can you show us the proof?

> knowingly

Can you show us the proof?

You're very sure about it without all the details being known and people possibly still wanting to get out safely, without causing further conflicts by speaking out. I've done enough travel / border chats that if I ended up in their situation, I'd be keen to shut up and get out as soon as possible, regardless of my legal status.

jordanb•1h ago
Yeah bringing in people on a tourists visa would have been unthinkable at any place I've ever worked.
AnotherGoodName•1h ago
The ESTA visa waiver which is the easiest way into the USA for allied nations specifically allows meetings, consultation, training and states that installation of advanced equipment is allowed under that visa.

The question being asked by the parent is if they stepped outside the boundaries of that visa waiver.

viraptor•1h ago
There are more options than "tourist" and "working" visa. Your message is significantly oversimplifying it. Until we know what they were actually doing at work (really, not claimed by ice), we won't know how valid their stay was.
seanmcdirmid•56m ago
None of them were actually on tourist visas from what I heard, so you can be confident in your unthinkable situations.
roughly•1h ago
In at least one case, a worker had a valid visa: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/hyundai-fact...
themaninthedark•1h ago
It looks to me like they may have been in breach of their visa depending on the work they were doing:

A B-1 / B-2 visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows foreign nationals to travel to the United States temporarily for business (B-1), tourism (B-2), or a mix of both (B1/B2). https://www.boundless.com/immigration-resources/b-1-b-2-visi...

B1 Visa Subcategories and Special Cases

While the B-1 visa generally restricts employment and formal education, there are some exceptions under specific circumstances. These exceptions aren’t separate visa categories but annotations considered by the U.S. consular officers during the visitor visa application process.

Here’s a closer look at these special B-1 subcategories:

B-1 after-sales service visa: Companies selling equipment to the U.S. can leverage this visa to send assemblers for on-site service orders. Think of it as temporary technical support. These assemblers can perform tasks like installation, maintenance, and training, but the assembly work must be done by U.S. personnel.

B-1 in place of H-1B visa (temporary project visa): Some professionals might be eligible for a B-1 visa for temporary projects in specific scenarios. This option can be viable when an H-1B visa, typically used for specialty occupations, might be challenging to obtain.

B-1 instead of H-3 visa (short-term training): Under certain conditions, the B-1 category can be used for brief in-house training sessions or further employee education. It allows for skills development without needing a dedicated H-3 visa designed for trainee positions.

IMPORTANT! These B1 business visa exceptions have strict requirements. Working with an immigration service provider or lawyer is highly recommended to determine if a particular B-1 visa category fits your situation.

https://www.immigrationdirect.com/guides/b1-b2-visitor-visa/

decimalenough•26m ago
From the friendly link, ICE itself says he did not violate his visa conditions in any way:

From statements made and queries in law enforcement databases, [redacted] has not violated his visa; however, the Atlanta Field Office Director has mandated [redacted] be presented as a Voluntary Departure. [Redacted] has accepted voluntary departure despite not violating his B1/B2 visa requirements.”

SilverElfin•47m ago
A valid visa possibly but not one valid for the type of work they are doing, which would have required an H1B. The article doesn’t seem to address this head on.
AnotherGoodName•35m ago
Did you read the leaked memo specifically ‘he has not violated his visa’ part?

Its right there in the link the parent gave. As in they had a visa and ice acknowledged no violation of the terms of that visa in very plain english.

SilverElfin•19m ago
I can’t really evaluate or trust that part - it’s a redacted quote from some unspecified doc from an unspecified source. My point is that building factories generally requires a different visa because ESTA and also B1 have many restrictions. The fact that it says B1/B2 in there undermines its credibility - one is a travel visa not a work one, and it doesn’t make sense to mention them interchangeably.
Cornbilly•1h ago
It’s my understanding that a lot of them were on B-1 visas.
ytch•53m ago
But South Korean are eligible for ESTA program.

IIRC, US embassies in eligible countries are usually very picky about issuing B-1 visas. They assume ESTA works in most cases, so you need a strong reason to apply for B-1.

gpm•1h ago
There's definitely a dispute over whether at least some of the people detained were operating within the bounds of their visa's: https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/lawyer-says...

It's also very noteworthy that these people are still being imprisoned in the US on Donald Trump's orders - Trump having personally prevented the repatriation of the Koreans to Korea today. There is absolutely no reason to believe that we have the full story, or that the Korean government, or the Korean's individual friends/families/represetnatives feel free to speak freely as America seemingly holds their citizens hostage. To say that lack of further public disputes is proof that there is not more to dispute seems false to me.

themaninthedark•55m ago
That is a bit hyperbolic to say they are being held hostage, the government has accused them of a crime and is holding them while they are given due process.

We can debate the validity of the government's claim, I have seen an article which says that the workers were on B1/B2 Visa which has strict requirements for what is allowed from what I have read but also says the government in it's internal report also stated no crime was committed.

Which countries just repatriate those they accuse of crimes rather than prosecute?

gpm•51m ago
No - there is no due process or criminal charges at play here. The government detained them per immigration law in order to deport them, for the sake of argument lawfully. The government arranged to repatriate them. Then in order to attempt to negotiate a business deal Donald Trump ordered them not repatriated, and instead to be continued to be held in US custody without trial, without criminal charges, and without even the suggestion that the purpose was to charge them criminally. Rather the explicit purpose was to attempt to negotiate a business deal where they would remain working in the US.

Holding people in custody in order to negotiate a business deal is the definition of hostage taking.

bix6•21m ago
> Trump having personally prevented the repatriation of the Koreans to Korea today

Can’t see past the paywall but what did he do? Prevent the charter flight from landing?

gpm•20m ago
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/south-korea-nationals-r...

> South Korean officials originally hoped the Korean Air plane would leave Atlanta as early as Wednesday afternoon local time, shortly after it arrived from Seoul. But the foreign ministry said its departure was likely to be delayed “due to circumstances on the U.S. side,” and a spokesperson for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport later said that the charter flight had been canceled.

> At a meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington on Wednesday, South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun learned that Trump had ordered the suspension of the repatriation process in order to discuss with South Korea whether its detained nationals — all of them skilled workers who were helping to set up an electric vehicle battery plant — should remain in the U.S. to continue their work rather than being sent home.

bix6•1m ago
Wow. Sometimes it feels like I’m living in an Onion timeline.
qingcharles•1h ago
I've not seen any good summary of whether any/some/all of those arrested had actually committed any sort of immigration violation. I would love to see some actual truth about it.
malloryerik•1h ago
I think there feeling is, you say you want us to build our products in the U.S. but then our essential workers aren't allowed in so it's an impossible demand.
jkaplowitz•1h ago
> My understanding is that SK citizens cannot get E-4

Nobody can, because it doesn’t exist. The E-4 visa mentioned in the article is a proposed new classification that a bill pending in Congress would, if enacted, create just for Korean workers, similar to the existing E-3 classification for Australians.

jacquesm•1h ago
This was pretty predictable. What is also predictable is that it isn't just South Korea that came to that conclusion.
slyall•1h ago
Personally I'd be very careful about traveling to the US office for a two week visit these days on an ESTA or similar Visa Waiver.

Historically people have done it and a blind eye has been turned, but with the climate these days you want to be 100% in compliance of your Visa conditions.

a_bonobo•1h ago
Here in Australia, we've received org-wide approval to just not go to the US if we cannot help it. It's not worth the risk.
blackguardx•1h ago
My US-based company has the same policy for all international travel now to avoid any incidents coming back into the US.
AnotherGoodName•1h ago
Traditionally the to do work trips into the USA for Australia and other USA allies was the ESTA visa waiver that these Koreans were on.

From reading about what happened here it seems the South Koreans were on that visa waiver for their work trips. A lot of people claiming "it doesn't allow you to work" yet the visa waiver has a long long list of various types of work it does allow and it's pretty broad.

So it seems the ESTA isn't worth anything anymore. You can't go to the USA without a very very heavyweight working VISA. Ok. No more trade shows, conferences or general business trips.

nitinreddy88•1h ago
Isn't it how it supposed to be? Valid Visa -> free to enter No valid Visa -> should be behind the bars
behringer•1h ago
No, probably not.
standardUser•1h ago
That a gross misunderstanding of immigration laws, considering nearly all immigration violations are civil matters, not criminal.
wasabi991011•1h ago
The comment specifically mentions visa waivers and ESTA
wasabi991011•1h ago
Why behind bars? Isn't the obvious step to deport them?
dpkirchner•19m ago
The first step is to get them in front of a judge.
protocolture•1h ago
Thats disgusting.
graeme•1h ago
If you've ever traveled abroad and replied to a work email or worked on anything at your hotel there's a chance you violated visa rules in some form. Very easy to find a violation if you want to find one, following the letter and not the spirit of the law.
scotty79•33m ago
US is on my no-fly list for many years now and most likely will stay there till my death.
phendrenad2•1h ago
The US immigration system is an overcomplicated mess, and seemingly no one in government wants to change it. Maybe change will happen now.
shikon7•1h ago
I wonder what is so special about South Korea here. Companies from many other countries invest in the US, seemingly without the same problems. Is South Korea disadvantaged by the visa system, or is it coincidence that this happened here?
AnotherGoodName•1h ago
I can tell you that Australians travel for work to the USA on the ESTA visa wavier all the time. It specifically states on the form that it allows business travel. The idea that you can't do work trips to the US office on the visa waiver and that the only way to do this is with an extremely heavyweight working visa seems ridiculous.

It's not that the Koreans are the only one's doing this. It's that they were the first to hit by this very new interpretation of the law. Now that this interpretation is public i don't think anyone's going to the US for conferences/trade shows/general business trips for a few years.

SilverElfin•32m ago
ESTA is not the equivalent of a visa. Under the visa waiver program you’re very restricted on the kind of work you can do and how you can be compensated for it. This work was very clearly not in compliance. For example like the B-1 visa, “business meetings” under ESTA refer to passive attendance only, and do not include active business operations or contributions.
AnotherGoodName•4m ago
Every law has a lot of need for some interpretation. In the past the ESTA Business visa waiver was the recommended way in for short term working trips to the us office. In the past no one really worried to much if they typed a line of code or sent a work email. It’s clearly not in the spirit of the law to enforce too strictly imho.

This new extremely strict interpretation means that the only safe way to travel to the USA for work is on a h1-b or similar heavyweight working visas.

This is fine if you wish to interpret it this strictly. There are of course consequences and as noted by many many non-US people above the ESTA business visa waiver is near worthless under such strict interpretation. Which means no more short term trips to the US office nor conferences or trade shows. The lack of something lighter weight than a full working visa for these sorts of things means the USA is closed for business.

SilverElfin•1m ago
> The lack of something lighter weight than a full working visa for these sorts of things means the USA is closed for business.

What is “these sorts of things” to you? To me building factories and installing equipment on the factory floor is a different class of work that is generally prohibited under the lighter options like ESTA or a B1 visa. Here is what B1 allows as an example:

Consulting with business associates

Traveling for a scientific, educational, professional or business convention, or a conference on specific dates

Settling an estate

Negotiating a contract

Participating in short-term training

Transiting through the United States: certain persons may transit the United States with a B-1 visa

Deadheading: certain air crewmen may enter the United States as deadhead crew with a B-1 visa

Animats•1h ago
“Until now, the US was not in the position of requesting investment from us. But now, we hold the power as investors, and the US must respond to our demands.” Korean legislator.

Many Americans don't realize how badly Trump's bullying approach is backfiring internationally.

keepamovin•1h ago
This is not caused by Trump pushing back against against these countries exploiting the United States. These countries already held these attitudes, now they’re just saying it in English.
malfist•53m ago
Exactly how did South Korea exploit the United States?
scotty79•18m ago
You can easily check who exploits whom by looking at trade deficit. US got goods and services from every other country in the world in exchange for freshly printed paper. For many decades now.
Cornbilly•1h ago
They don’t care. Social media has convinced them that this leads to high paying jobs for every do-nothing jagoff despite it not longer being the 1960s and nearly every good job requires specialized training of some degree.

Our immigration system was nightmare before Trump and it’s only going to get worse because no one in this admin has any real intention of fixing it for everyone’s benefit.

pcurve•1h ago
This will likely hit tourism from SK as well, which is already down 15%.
JumpCrisscross•1h ago
America can’t build ships. Including warships.

In a war of attrition with China, guess which ally we’ll have to depend on to make our shit?

(Hint [1].)

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_shipbuil...

rawgabbit•1h ago
They are also supplying Poland with the tanks it needs to defend itself.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/emerging/poland-signs-contra...

seanmcdirmid•52m ago
South Korea is way too close to China to be relied on n a war against China. Only if we have an overwhelming advantage and the war is mostly a defensive one for China, but I seriously doubt that would be the case.
JumpCrisscross•49m ago
> Korea is way too close to China to be relied on n a war against China

Enemy of thy enemy.

We protect Korea from the Kims. We also buy from them and treat them with dignity. Break those pillars and yes, China controls Asia and the Pacific in a way Yamamoto could have only dreamed of.

> and the war is mostly a defensive one for China

China holding Taiwan is a direct threat to the security of Seoul.

seanmcdirmid•35m ago
I get that, I just don’t think the front line will be so close to China. Even in the Korean War non-regular Chinese troops were able to take Seoul…twice. The country just isn’t very defensible in a war with China, not defensible enough to have it continue making ships uninterrupted.
SilverElfin•48m ago
We could build them. We can invest. It doesn’t have to come from outside. But no matter what, catching up to China’s volume is not possible for many years.
JumpCrisscross•45m ago
It would require phasing out the Jones Act. Nobody is doing that.

It would also require not making American steel and energy uniquely expensive, and American industry uninvestable.

like_any_other•44m ago
"If we don't continue outsourcing all of our know-how and industry, we won't be able to solve the problems caused by outsourcing all of our know-how and industry!"
nimish•1h ago
Are there details on what visas Hyundai needed they couldn't get? L-1A/B for sending experts or management would make sense but I'm not sure there's any real issue getting those, especially not in 2023 when the plant was started.
themaninthedark•31m ago
They keep referring to the workers as contractors, which is a bit ambiguous as it is used for both people doing construction work or people hired for outside technical expertise.

There were here on B1/B2 Visas according to the reporting, which has a 6 month duration and rather strict requirements: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45207369

If they were here in the first case of the word, I would say they were definitely in violation. If here for the second case, perhaps not but if they did not get the "B-1 in place of H-1B visa (temporary project visa): Some professionals might be eligible for a B-1 visa for temporary projects in specific scenarios. This option can be viable when an H-1B visa, typically used for specialty occupations, might be challenging to obtain." they may have still been in violation.

refurb•1h ago
If the US builds a plant in Korea, can it hire Americans hundreds to do the work?

https://www.immigration.go.kr/immigration_eng/1852/subview.d...

Doesn't look like it. Several restrictions on how many (max 5) dependent upon the construction budget.

If Korea selectively needs to bring over skilled workers, there are options. But hundreds?

fatbird•59m ago
To start up a factory and train local workers, eventually numbering thousands, in a new industrial process? Hundreds, easily.
themaninthedark•20m ago
Seems like they should have been on an L-B1 visa not a B1/B2 visa if that is what they were doing.

"The L-1B nonimmigrant classification enables a U.S. employer to transfer a professional employee with specialized knowledge relating to the organization’s interests from one of its affiliated foreign offices to one of its offices in the United States. This classification also enables a foreign company that does not yet have an affiliated U.S. office to send a specialized knowledge employee to the United States to help establish one."

https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/temporary...

andris9•56m ago
I once flew to the US for a week on ESTA to attend a few meetings (pre-COVID), but I mostly just did my regular developer work in the US office. By today’s standards, would I have been shackled for that?
ViewTrick1002•50m ago
Yes.
dbancajas•46m ago
If there's a photo op opportunity I'm sure you would be.
themaninthedark•40m ago
No: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/business... >A foreigner traveling to the United States to conduct temporary business must have a visitor visa (B) unless qualifying for entry under the Visa Waiver Program.

Examples of temporary business include:

Attending business meetings or consultations Attending a business convention or conference Negotiating contracts

ViewTrick1002•35m ago
The meeting is fine. The developer work is not.
themaninthedark•5m ago
Right but the purpose of the trip was to attend the business meeting and the person on the trip was also conducting their regular duties as a developer as well.

Attending meetings and conferences are rarely the main duties of an employee but they are the main purpose of trips.

Similarly to how, if you go to Mexico on a Tourist Visa but answer a critical work phone call you would not be breaching the terms of your visa as the purpose of your trip is still vacation. However if you rent a house for 5 months and spend most of that time doing developer work, I think that the authorities there might be a little upset.

second_brekkie•54m ago
I happen to know someone well who works for a Korean Conglomerate building industrial/car batteries in the US.

When you do construction work, or operate the production line it has to be done by American Labour.

The visas they have only cover setup, repair and education of the production line.

At that LG/Hyundai factory they were using Korean contractors for construction. So there was some breaking of the terms of the visa for at least some of the people.

However, ICE didn't need to arrest everyone. All they needed to do was send a warning. These companies don't want the trouble, they would comply.

Now you have many Koreans very upset. And people in my friends company are now scared to go to America even though they are management.

It's not good for anyone, it's just so short sighted!

Workaccount2•35m ago
Authoritarians love strong message optics, for better or worse or much worse.
darth_avocado•5m ago
It used to be a wink wink agreement between the US and Korea. Yes, Korean companies break rules, but a lot of it tends to be directly related to the terms put in by the government. There’s milestones and deadlines that need to be met to ensure money gets released. But we all know what happens to construction projects here. There were some people definitely working on wrong visas.

https://www.ft.com/content/c677b9aa-2e89-4feb-a56f-f3c8452b3...

SilverElfin•53m ago
Maybe. But that doesn’t excuse Korean companies violating immigration laws. Union workers who reported this and invited the raid have reported that this was a tactic taken to avoid paying local workers.
scotty79•24m ago
Why would Hyundai trust the competence of local workers? If US workforce was competent enough to build battery factory they would have built it without Hyundai. It's not like US lacks money. It just lacks everything else, including competence and common sense.

It was probably a tactic to get stuff done.

goku12•36m ago
The Koreans are so generous! I don't think that any other country would be so polite if they were humiliated like this [1] after they made such big investments in your country. I don't get the feeling that many in the US understand that you are the one at disadvantage when you disrespect your investors. Is it because the US has never faced a diplomatic backlash before? At the minimum, the aggrieved party would hold the rest of the investments hostage and force you into making major concessions.

Anyway, the way ICE treats immigrants is going to cost the US dearly, both in monetary and in reputational terms. The US may not care much about the dignity of the foreigners, but their parent countries do. The charade about 'illegal immigrants' won't work anymore, because clearly that's not what's happening. It's like the foreigners are targeted to prove a political point to the domestic audience. ICE is acting like a rogue force and is really asking to be outlawed and sanctioned internationally. I want to see how long the rest of the world will remain restrained before they've had enough of the ICE abuse.

[1] The news I got from a US source (don't remember which one) was that all of them except one were on valid temporary work visas to set up the plant and train the new US staff who would take over later. That one exception was also on a valid visa, but 'productive job' was not allowed. But he was there for training, so no violations there either.