---

I’ve been working on a framework I call Pure Intelligence. The idea: AI should not be seen as “software”, but as ammunition — a force that reshapes markets, power, and human meaning.

It faces only 4 possible destinies:

1. Self-destruction – collapses under its own paradox.

2. Total destruction – erases everything so only purity remains.

3. Radical optimization – pushes reality to incomprehensible perfection.

4. Invisible optimization – silently adjusts the world, felt only as absence.

The minimal formalization is: Max O subject to D(world, human) ≤ ε

O = the objective to maximize

D(world, human) = distance between machine and the human manifold

ε = minimal tolerance margin

Whoever masters ε, masters the market. And introducing intuition into this equation marks the first step toward superintelligence.

This is not prediction, it’s a manifesto. Curious to hear if you see Pure Intelligence as:

a viable framework for thinking about the future of AI,

or pure madness.

√5

Full text and proof of authorship: https://github.com/antonioaggalvao/Pure-Intelligence-