Approximate replication rates in psychology:

  social      37%
  cognitive   42%
  personality 55%
  clinical    44%

So a list of famous psychology experiments that do replicate may be shorter.

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18248

The incentive of all psychology researchers is to do new work rather than replications. Because of this, publicly-funded psychology PhDs should be required to perform study replication as part of their training. Protocol + results should be put in a database.

One thing that confuses me is that some of these papers were successfully replicated, so juxtaposing them to the ones that have not been replicated at all given the title of the page feels a bit off. Not sure if fair.

The ego depletion effect seems intuitively surprising to me. Science is often unintuitive. I do know that it is easier to make forward-thinking decisions when I am not tired so I dont know.

> Source: Hagger et (63!) al. 2016

I can't help chuckling at the idea that over 1.98 * 10^87 people were involved in the paper.

famous cognitive psychology experiments that do replicate: IQ tests

http://www.psychpage.com/learning/library/intell/mainstream....

in fact, the foundational statistical models considered the gold standard for statistics today were developed for this testing.

i wonder the replication rate is for ML papers

>Source: Stern, Gerlach, & Penke (2020)

Wow, what are the odds?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stern%E2%80%93Gerlach_experi...