In modern times, our alphabet is devolving into a picture language, due to a disorder called "iconitis".
I like yours though.
In the actual development of writing, it isn't likely that a picture of a snail would be used to represent a semantically related word. Even in the earliest systems, where you could use a picture of a snail to represent the word "snail", it would be limited to (a) the word "snail", or (b) some other word that was pronounced identically. This is how it worked in Egyptian, Akkadian, and Chinese.
For example, 慢 is the Mandarin word for "slow", and it's pronounced "màn". There is a logic to its appearance: the component on the left, 忄, represents that it is a mental state† (I'm not sure why this was felt to be true of "fast" and "slow", but it was), and the component on the right, 曼, just so happens to be pronounced "màn".
(Most sound indications in Chinese characters are no longer that exact. They used to match better, but many centuries of language change followed. 丁 is dīng; 打 is dǎ.)
† Some more typical characters in the same category: 情 "feeling" (n.), 怕 "fear" (v.), 懂 "understand" (v.), 恨 "hate" (v.).
I used emojis for a while on phone texting. I eventually realized they were juvenile and stupid, and stopped.
Save the artwork for wonderful things like the illustrations in the Pooh books.
That's not true. The Rhind mathematical papyrus documents worked mathematical problems. Matt Parker of the youtube channel "stand up maths" did a collaboration video recently with Ilona Regulski of the British Museum about it.
antihipocrat•4mo ago
The opportunities for creative expression are amazing in such a system
jhbadger•4mo ago
Pet_Ant•4mo ago
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebus
glimshe•4mo ago
RataNova•4mo ago