Ladybird is great, but Omarchy is a weird choice. Why can't DHH / Basecamp sponsor David's hobby distro if he wants?

The browser ecosystem is dangerously centralized and another independent rendering engine would be welcome. In contrast, I don't see the value in yet another flavor-of-the-week Linux distro. Even sponsoring Arch directly would make more sense here.

Great to see CF sponsoring Ladybird! One of the most important projects out there right now.

I run vanilla arch/i3, so not super interested in Omarchy itself - but am curious to know how polished of a distro they can come up with. I may give it a try soon.

My big question about Ladybird, will it support BSD also ?

>Ladybird has since grown into a cross-platform browser supporting Linux, macOS, and other Unix-like systems

Cool, seems it will support

BSD, hopefully that sticks with this new funding.

> Omarchy 3.0 was released just last week with faster installation and increased Macbook compatibility, so if you’ve been Linux-curious for a while now, we encourage you to try it out!

"If you're curious about trying Linux, why not install this obscure mouseless tiling WM distro to guarantee you'll never attempt to use Linux again!"

I'm curious what makes LadyBird so special compared to other major browsers like Firefox and Chromium?

Honestly nice move on CF's part, have to say; there's more real energy moving in the open source world since Lunduke started commenting.