frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Valve Prism

https://valveprism.com/
1•alhazraed•52s ago•0 comments

Local TV Giant Sinclair Ends Jimmy Kimmel Boycott

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/business/media/sinclair-jimmy-kimmel-boycott.html
2•jaredwiener•2m ago•0 comments

How Tridge Reverse Engineered BitKeeper

https://lwn.net/Articles/132938/
1•whatever3•3m ago•0 comments

Bottlebrush particles deliver big chemotherapy payloads directly to cancer cells

https://news.mit.edu/2025/bottlebrush-particles-deliver-big-chemotherapy-payloads-directly-cancer...
1•PaulHoule•5m ago•0 comments

I Fell for a $1.25M Scam – Now MrBeast Is Helping Me Hunt Down the Scammers

https://www.entrepreneur.com/money-finance/i-fell-for-a-125-million-scam-now-mrbeast-is-helping/4...
1•alvinolsonn•6m ago•0 comments

Who invented convolutional neural networks?

https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/who-invented-convolutional-neural-networks.html
1•tosh•7m ago•0 comments

H-1B Disruption

https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2025-09-26-trump-h-1b-visa-disruption/
1•pauljonas•7m ago•0 comments

Why Is There a Bucatini Shortage in America? (2020)

https://www.grubstreet.com/2020/12/2020-bucatini-shortage-investigation.html
1•walterbell•7m ago•0 comments

If you are harassed by lasers

https://www.laserpointersafety.com/harassment.html
2•1970-01-01•9m ago•0 comments

We're debugging LLMs in production by reading chat logs

https://qckfx.com/blog/were-debugging-llms-in-production-by-reading-chat-logs
1•chw9e•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Giraffocus – iOS app blocker with a mindful pause

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/screen-time-control-giraffocus/id6745581026
1•kw_dev•10m ago•1 comments

Tai Lopez bought RadioShack. Now he's being sued for using it in a Ponzi scheme

https://www.aol.com/articles/internet-marketer-tai-lopez-bought-220945198.html?guccounter=1&guce_...
4•thm•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Font Tester – Preview fonts on custom content

https://fonts.tomhadley.link/
3•solumos•13m ago•0 comments

Resumebase – open-source job agent

https://github.com/udaybuilds47/resumebase
1•udaybuilds47•13m ago•1 comments

Researchers are launching the first mushroom-powered waterless toilet

https://news.ubc.ca/2025/09/ubc-launches-worlds-first-mushroom-powered-waterless-toilet/
1•giuliomagnifico•15m ago•0 comments

The power couple behind some of Top Gear telly's best-loved stunts

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/interview/meet-power-couple-behind-some-top-gear-tellys-best-lov...
1•viburnum•15m ago•0 comments

AI Framework for Full-Stack Apps by Google

https://genkit.dev
1•saikatsg•16m ago•0 comments

When Bruce Lee Trained with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

https://lithub.com/when-bruce-lee-trained-with-kareem-abdul-jabbar/
6•bookofjoe•17m ago•0 comments

Google Wins, We Lose

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/opinion/google-judge-mehta-remedy-monopoly.html
1•goplayoutside•22m ago•1 comments

Mathematical Patterns in Phone Numbers

https://barish.me/blog/mathematical-phone-numbers/
1•toonewbie•25m ago•1 comments

Teaching LLMs to spell with token healing

https://blog.sweep.dev/posts/token-healing-autocomplete
2•williamzeng0•26m ago•0 comments

Corporate America Is Caving to Trump, Not Just Because of a Lack of Backbone

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/business/trump-disney-paramount-shareholder-capitalism.html
5•ripe•26m ago•1 comments

Arete Systems 1000 – Computer Ads from the Past

https://computeradsfromthepast.substack.com/p/arete-systems-1000
1•rbanffy•28m ago•0 comments

Why Early-Stage Founders Should Consider Skipping Prior Art Searches for Patents

https://ideaclerk.com/blog/why-early-stage-founders-should-consider-skipping-prior-art-searches
1•ian_schick•28m ago•0 comments

Trump Clears Way for Cronies to Buy TikTok for $14B

https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/09/25/trump-tiktok
12•alwillis•31m ago•0 comments

Chrome DevTools MCP

https://developer.chrome.com/blog/chrome-devtools-mcp
1•zora_goron•32m ago•0 comments

We Got to See Snapdragon X2 Elite PCs in Action and They Look Impressive

https://hothardware.com/news/we-got-to-see-snapdragon-x2-elite-in-action-and-it-looks-impressive
3•rbanffy•32m ago•0 comments

Emergency Software: Software Development Lessons from Emisari

https://ztoz.blog/posts/emisari/
1•jwstarr•32m ago•0 comments

Retail Stores May Soon Use Drones to Chase Thieves

https://gizmodo.com/flock-safety-retail-theft-drones-2000664310
1•mikece•35m ago•2 comments

Goodbye petrostates, hello 'electrostates': clean energy shift reshaping world

https://theconversation.com/goodbye-petrostates-hello-electrostates-how-the-clean-energy-shift-is...
5•gnabgib•35m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

https://suno.com/studio-welcome
45•debrisapron•2h ago

Comments

thesparks•1h ago
v5 is really good. I can't believe how much progress Suno has made in such a short time.
Jordan-117•1h ago
I don't understand why their vocals are still so bad, though. They always have this tinny, synthy vibe that's very noticeable.
jjangkke•1h ago
it doesn't interfere with my enjoyment of Suno 5's output and enough for me to pay for it now.

Suno 6 should solve those issues.

recursive•1h ago
I'm really curious how the traditional DAW features stack up against the incumbents. A good DAW has a ton of features. Developing a whole DAW from scratch just to add a "generate part" button sounds like a lot.
lomase•1h ago
The people using Sunno AI don't care about writing or mixing music.

They don't need the same feature list.

recursive•5m ago
The video seems to be trying to convince me that this is totally targeted at actual musicians. But I guess maybe that's how their target users imagine themselves?
input_sh•54m ago
I can tell you exactly how any professional is gonna evaluate this DAW: press Ctrl+F, type "VST", see 0 results, close the page.
meowface•48m ago
If they do add VST support I could see them becoming a legitimate player. Without it it's definitely just a toy.
input_sh•39m ago
They're never gonna let you upload and run your own executable files to their infrastructure.

That + latency with MIDI devices is why every DAW-in-a-browser is just a toy.

polishdude20•14m ago
You can get a vst to run locally and still work with the browser.
recursive•5m ago
Didn't realize this was in a browser. That tells me all I need to know.
80hd•1h ago
I wasn't expecting to, but I got chills listening to some Suno creations from artists who are clearly very talented at using this new medium.

Much like those of us hammering away at LLMs who eventually get incredible results through persistence, people are doing the same with these other AI tools, creating in an entirely new way.

I'm sure Suno are working hard on this and these AI tools can only come together as fast as we can figure out the UX for all this stuff, but I'm holding out for when I can guide the music with specific melodies using voice or midi.

For "conventional" musicians, we (or at least I) would love to have that level of control. Often we know exactly what it should sound like, but might not have session musicians or expensive VSTs (or patience) on hand to get exactly the sound we want. Currently we make do with what we have - but this tech could allow many to take their existing productions to the next level.

patapong•1h ago
That sounds really interesting. Would you mind sharing some examples of such creations?
lomase•1h ago
They will not.
meowface•52m ago
They probably won't. And if they do probably everyone will ridicule the songs. But maybe they will link the songs and maybe at least half the repliers will say the songs actually are good. I like rooting for the underdog.
lomase•42m ago
Suno with its $125 million VC funding is everything but an underdog my friend.
bogtap82•1h ago
I'm not the person you responded to, but these are some examples from someone I know that had accompanying music videos (actual video production) made for them:

Sunscreen: https://youtu.be/VBaWtOHPTZw

Purple Sunset Over Lake 2: https://youtu.be/lD7rSxPncs4

nadermx•54m ago
These are terrible
bogtap82•41m ago
Thanks, I'll let them know.
architectonic•29m ago
I enjoy this AI generated album https://open.spotify.com/album/6C6PJzxkHctvk1ibKM2zMx?si=YgL...
nibblenum•1h ago
i wonder what https://www.renoise.com/ would be like like this
chrisvenum•1h ago
While I like using AI for assisting with repetitive programming, I can’t help but feel sorry for my producer and illustrator friends who are now having to compete with generated tools.

Is it snobby of me to look down upon art that is created using these tools as lesser because the human did not make every tiny decision going into a peice? That a persons taste and talent is no longer fully used to produce something and for someone reason to me what is what makes the art impressive and meaningful?

Something about art with imperfections still feels exciting, maybe even more so than if I see something that is perfect but if I see an AI gen picture with 6 fingers, I just write it all off as slop.

I am happy to allow my generated code to come from “training data” but I see the use of AI in art, writing and music as using stolen artists hard work.

I feel like as time goes on, I feel even more conflicted about it all.

nh23423fefe•1h ago
You as a human chose to write this very common opinion and even include writing errors like the following

> That a persons taste and talent is no longer fully used to produce something and for someone reason to me what is what makes the art impressive and meaningful?

Human output isn't sacred. yes this is snobbery, a useless feeling of superiority.

jjangkke•1h ago
Applying your logic, did you feel bad for seamstresses when industrial revolution took off? did you feel bad for hardware manufacturers in America when they were outsourced to China? Art is also a form of labor and whoever can produce quality at quantity wins. Idealizing art in some sort of religious idolation is just plain silly. We haven't had the Picassos or Mozarts or Oscar Peterson for quite some time now yet the world is just fine. People play playlists in front of millions of live crowd and get accolade for it vs real instruments. Times change, technology change and art changes.

You either adapt or go hungry just like everybody else and art shouldn't be exempt from the mechanics of supply and demand.

a456463•1h ago
I hear this but this is not the industrial revolution buddy.
chrisvenum•41m ago
I almost agree with you that this is about quality, but I still feel that the context in which art comes from influences how I perceive it.

Take, for example, a track by Fontaines D.C., a band from Ireland that writes extensively about the lived social and political experience. Knowing where they are from and the general themes of their work makes their tracks feel authentic, and you can appreciate the worldview they have and the time spent producing the art, even if it does not align with your own tastes.

Trying to create something of the same themes and quality from a prompt of “make me an Irish pop rock track about growing up in the country” suddenly misses any authenticity.

Maybe this is what I am trying to get at, but like I said, I feel some conflict about this, as I personally value these tools for productivity

chrisvenum•39m ago
Saying that, maybe a DAW experience makes what can be created more personal
raincole•1h ago
> Is it snobby of me

Yes. But aesthetic taste and snobbery usually go hand in hand.

jjangkke•1h ago
What's special about Suno 5 is that the songs are actually good to listen to in place of professionally produced songs. For example, my favorite genre is new jack swing and there is a very limited number of this genre as it was briefly popular during the 90s. Now I have an endless supply of it and you can't tell that its AI produced anymore. Sure to an expert they might be able to detect it but for consumers its just as good as spotify playlist.

This is the first time I'm actually paying for generated AI content because the value I get is immense. I really think we are headed towards and over supply of content where there will be more stuff to read, watch, listen with very real value in all of them.

This spells out the inevitable change in the labor market for content creators. There will always be value for human created content and some will make more money but it will always have the AI generated content generation competing with it to the point where it will be hard to stay ahead and eventually people will stop caring.

Case in point, I see some comments being snarkish towards Suno but for as a consumer I could care less if you put your soul and years into producing art vs the one I can get a lot of today and now especially when there is virtually no difference in quality.

Truly an amazing accomplishment from Suno team, and probably the first time I've subbed to a music service after decades of downloading mp3s, hunting down new songs to listen to on Youtube. Suno 'steamified" this process and while I will use youtube to discover new genre, I am spending now most of my time in Suno, listening to endless amount of the exact sound I am looking for.

lomase•1h ago
What's special about Suno 5 is that the songs are actually good to listen to in place of professionally produced songs.

This is a big big lie.

neom•50m ago
Rather than call it a lie, I think it would be more fair to say in this instance it's a matter of taste/perspective. Personally, I enjoy listening to Suno songs.
tummler•1h ago
What a dystopian and depressing outlook on the valuation and enjoyment of art. Truly hope you're an anomaly.
a456463•1h ago
Couldn't agree more. Instead of seeking out people making that art, we are now leaving "art" or human expressive emotion to random noise and paying for it.
meowface•1h ago
I simultaneously feel repulsed by AI music and "art" and yet am totally open to being captivated by AI music if I really feel something is musically better than almost any human-made music I've heard.

I just haven't heard anything that isn't "slopful" yet. If I do, I will still feel weird about it, but I'm a big believer in the value of "aesthetic objects in themselves", so I am eager to find something I do actually like.

Even just knowing something was drawn or composed by an AI will negatively taint my opinion from the start, but I'm still open.

lomase•57m ago
I do love generative music. I don't care if you get your notes from a markov chain a shif register a LLM or your brain.

The problem with AI music is that is just sounds like shit.

meowface•57m ago
Right. That's pretty much my stance.

I don't totally discount the position that the human "soul" is what makes art art and all that, but I still do think something can be very enjoyable and good without being created by a sentient entity, in theory.

smt88•1h ago
I've had some fun with Suno 5, but the songs absolutely don't replace well-made human music. They're much more formulaic and over-produced. They're usually forgettable. People I play them for can always tell they're AI produced.
zubzubi•5m ago
I find it depends how you generate it. Asking Suno to make covers of uploaded recordings tends to give much, much better results than asking it to cook a song from scratch. There are still quite a few tells that it's AI-made but it's not bad at all, at least in my experience so far.
tbeseda•10m ago
> as a consumer I could care less if you put your soul and years into producing art vs the one I can get a lot of today

a quantity over quality argument with regard to art is wild.

sandoze•1h ago
Before AI there was a general consensus that creative areas (eg. Cities) were becoming a homogenized experience. A Starbuckization if you will. I can’t help but wonder what gets lost when using tools like this.
jckahn•1h ago
Culture
cdrini•47m ago
It's unclear to me whether it will result in more homogeneity, as a result of prompts being a coarse medium that results in the AI choosing what it's seen to fill in the rest, or less homogeneity, as a result of more people with non-mainstream tastes being able to create music aligned with their niche that otherwise wouldn't exist due time/money restrictions. I think the latter seems a bit more likely, but time will tell.
jsheard•42m ago
There's not really any need to speculate when this has already played out in other mediums - would you say that the proliferation of LLMs has led to an explosion of novel and interesting works of fiction, or just an explosion of cookie-cutter slop ebooks?
cdrini•31m ago
I would say too soon to tell. There has been an uptick in ebook slop, but I'm not sure if it's impacted the homogeneity of literature, because I don't think anyone is reading ai ebooks. It's not enough for it to exist to impact culture, it has to be being consumed.

Music is a uniquely interesting case, since music has a much lower barrier of entry to consume.

tummler•1h ago
Suno is moving toward becoming a browser-based DAW that happens to use AI. There are already more capable and established DAWs, and I see no reason they can't implement AI into their workflows-- in a more precise manner, where it's actually useful, instead of wholesale as a gimmick. Many are already doing this. So I don't understand where Suno is going with any of this.

It either needs to be: 1. So easy anyone can press a button and magically get exactly what they want with perfect accuracy and quality. 2. So robust and powerful it enables new kinds of music production and super-charges human producers.

This is neither. And I don't buy Suno's argument that they're solving a real problem here. Creative people don't hate the process of creating art-- it's the process itself and the personal expression that make it worthwhile. And listeners/consumers can tell the difference between art created with intent and soul, and a pale imitation of that.

raincole•55m ago
All you said is very reasonable.

But then you look at image gen. The established one, namely Adobe, are surprisingly not winning the AI race.

Then you look at code gen. The established IDEs are doing even worse.

I don't rule out the possibility of music being truly special, but the idea of "established tools can just easily integrate AI right" isn't universally true.

tummler•43m ago
The innovator's dilemma is real. IMO none of the big DAWs are well-positioned to capitalize on AI, but that doesn't mean they couldn't.

I'd argue music generation is different from image or code generation. It's closer to being purely art. Take image generation for example. Most of the disruption is coming from competition with graphic design, marketing, creative/production processes, etc. The art world isn't up in arms about AI "art" competing with human art.

leobuskin•38m ago
It does mean. The switch from writing “applicable” software to creating cutting edge AI is almost impossible. The parent comment makes great examples, we can add to that list JetBrains (amazing IDEs, zero ability to catch up with ML), for example. It’s a very different fast-paced scientific driven domain.
danielvaughn•41m ago
Agreed. The problem with being an incumbent in this era is that much of the existing UI/UX assumptions are based on the idea of manual manipulation. We're so early that foundational assumptions are still up for debate, and for large companies like Adobe, there's just no way they'd be able to move at the required pace to keep up. Heck I'm at a company that's less than 2 years old, with less than 20 people, solely devoted to AI, and it's still hard for us to keep up.

What Adobe and others ought to be doing is setting up internal labs that have free reign to explore whatever ideas they want, with no barriers or formality. I doubt any of them will do that.

jsheard•50m ago
> It either needs to be: 1. So easy anyone can press a button and magically get exactly what they want with perfect accuracy and quality. 2. So robust and powerful it enables new kinds of music production and super-charges human producers.

Don't forget the secret third option - facilitate a tidal wave of empty-calorie content which saturates every avenue for discovery and "wins" purely by drowning everything else out through sheer volume. We're at the point where some genAI companies are all but admitting that's their goal.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/digital/ai-podcas...

zubzubi•39m ago
Yes I'm already doing this manually with Reason. I'll compose something that's quite bare bones, export the audio and run it through Suno, asking it to cover and improvise with a specific style, then when I have something I like, I split that into stems, import some or all of these to Reason and then reconstruct and enhance the sound using instruments in Reason, mostly by replaying the parts I like on keyboard and tweaking it in the piano roll. Often I get additional inspiration just by doing that. Eventually I delete all the tracks that came from Suno stems when I've finished this process.

That way I get new musical ideas from Suno but without any trace of Suno in the final output. Suno's output, even with the v5 model, is never quite what I want anyway so this way makes most sense to me. Also it means there's no Suno audio watermarking in the final product.

tummler•32m ago
This is similar to what I do. There are all kinds of useful ways to incorporate AI into the music production process. It should be treated like a collaborative partner, or any other tool/plugin.

It shouldn't be a magic button that does everything for you, removing the human element. A human consciously making decisions with intent, informed by life experience, to share a particular perspective, is what makes art art.

wartywhoa23•1h ago
Degenerative art in full swing.
bitbuilder•48m ago
As someone who's both a software engineer and music producer its been really interesting to watch the parallel progression of the AI advancements in both areas, as well as my own sentiments towards those advancements.

I've always been pretty bullish about using LLMs to help with coding. My comment history here should verify that. I just thought it was insanley cool tech, and I found I was rediscovering the joy of programming when I could delegate out all the tedious crap I could never get myself to do. Side projects that had languished for years were finally getting somewhere near "done". I also found in many cases it was actually smarter than me, finding cleaner and more elegant solutions to problems than I ever would have. And that was great!

The first time I played with Suno though, it was all so different. I felt deflated. What was the point in making music if a robot could do it better? Yes, the first models were crap, but the writing was on the wall. Music is all about pattern recognition and repetition after all, why wouldn't the robots be great at it? I suddenly knew how all those visual artists felt once the image models started rapidly improving.

So it's been interesting try to disect why I thought coding models were great, and creative models... well, depressing.

Part of it in my case was because being that guy who made cool music was always part of my identity, a part of me I was proud of. Coding, not so much. Don't get me wrong, I've had some pretty big career achievements that I'm very proud of, and I love coding. But at the end of day, the lines of code written were just a means to an end to making something cool.

Which brings me to the other reason I think I was so much more positive about LLMs: the application I was bringing to life with the help of an LLM still very much felt like "mine". Yes, maybe the tedium of writing a bunch of boilerplate was being delegated, but the idea, the architecture, the UX, were still all mine. So I was building something I could still feel proud of.

But typing a prompt into a box and getting a song back? Nah, that's not really mine. It's no different than shouting an idea to a musical improv musician and getting a song back. Maybe you gave them a cool idea, but the song isn't yours.

Which brings me full circle back to this new Suno DAW announcement: this is absolutely incredible. I've only skimmed the announcement so far, but I feel like this brings AI song generation firmly back into the court of how I'm using LLMs to code: letting AI take care of the boring shit, and letting me focus on the composition.

I've only really ever produced electronic music of various varieties, and I have so many uncompleted songs whithering on the vine because I wasted a week of time flipping endlessly through patches, tweaking them, trying to find "that sound" in my head that I could never bring to life, then eventually getting sick of the song and saying fuck it.

And in my experiments with Suno, I found it was actually crazy good at matching a "sound" I described, I just wished I had a way to compose my own song based on the sounds it generated. And now here it is.

ewuhic•41m ago
What is the current SOTA for open source or open weights music generation model?
jononor•15m ago
How is the stem support these days? In particular I would like to create some songs with vocals (my lyrics), then be able to remove the vocal track and replace it with my own.
jasongrishkoff•4m ago
I've been working on an AI detector for the last few months. Updated it to handle Suno V5 on Wednesday - looks like it's very similar to V4.5. Am curious to see how this Studio version impacts the model I've trained.

If you want to test it, here's the link: https://www.submithub.com/ai-song-checker