One may argue that tit-for-tat is appropriate, but generous-tit-for-tat is better.
Alternatively, consider the world in which the claim that it is victim blaming is 100% true. Such a world, where large parts of the U.S. are focusing their attention on righting grievances instead of anything else, is a world where the U.S. is too distracted by actual civil war to avoid suffering conquest by foreign powers.
I'd ask for a citation of what Biden/Biden's admin actually did, but the Trump folks have been so busy disappearing things that the policy that I think you're referring to is now gone from the WhiteHouse.gov site and doesn't seem to be available via Internet Archive either.
Once again, in harmony, and louder for the people in the back: the both-sidesism is utterly misguided, plays into the Trump camp's hands, and just entirely fails to recognize just how not-normal and dangerous things are right now and they are just getting worse by the day.
Rise up now, before it's too late!
With the law enforcement apperartus distracted chasing anarchists, queers and anitifa it must be boom times for organised crime
kelseyfrog•51m ago
Usually these things end up bringing more attention to a specific group or cause due to the Streisand Effect.
fifteen1506•48m ago
You can't kill an idea, but you can severely maim it for a generation or 2.
anon7725•37m ago
jasonwatkinspdx•12m ago
China is one example, where being too vocal about certain topics online can land you in a police station interview.
I don't think we should be overly confident that similar things can't happen in the US or EU.
And indeed, in the US we're seeing the administration successfully pressure changes at educational institutions for example. We're already uncomfortably far down this road imo.