I’ve been following both Veo3 and Wan 2.5 closely, and the differences are starting to feel interesting. Veo3 has been the benchmark for cinematic AI video, especially with its stability and audio-video sync.

Wan 2.5, though, takes a different route. It’s built on a native multimodal setup, meaning text, images, and audio are processed together instead of stitched from separate models. That allows smoother lip-sync, more natural background sounds, and videos that don’t feel like patchwork. The workflow is quick: input text or an image, optionally add audio, and you get a preview in minutes.

The question is: does this make Wan 2.5 a true alternative to Veo3, or just another contender? Curious to hear from others who’ve tested both.