Weirdly the author seems to acknowledge this despite the title:
> Combatants also have to be physically fit enough to endure incredible hardship.
But they discount the importance of having a culture that is appropriate for the job throughout the organization not just for combatants. Sure a programmer doesn’t need to be running a fast mile or whatever, but culture still matters and a soft one doesn’t seem appropriate for the military.
As for Russia’s failures - I don’t see why those would carry over to America. The author suggests their image of a masculine aggressive force hasn’t worked in Ukraine. I would say it isn’t enough on its own - you still need industrial strength and technology and all that. But dismissing the importance of a “warrior culture” on this one example feels like a leap.
Discipline is lacking at all ranks because every soldier has become inured to the endless stream of bullshit. I'm talking about the real military and not the jingoistic slop that is portrayed in novels.
There is a reason why no one is staying in the military anymore. Our actual culture has taught people that sadism and ignorance are not virtues. We also know that they do not make soldiers more ready for combat.
What makes a warrior is killing the enemy before they can kill you and your countryman, not bullying their comrades to suicide or hating them because of their gender or skin color.
throwmeaway222•55m ago