Tell that to the actual soldiers on the ground that have died. Videos of their encounters show that war is still extremely physical, moving through dense obstacle filled environments or large open fields while wearing thick outfits and carrying equipment. This is so obvious that I can’t understand how anyone would think physical fitness doesn’t matter, let alone rant incoherently about it.
Weirdly the author seems to acknowledge this despite the title:
> Combatants also have to be physically fit enough to endure incredible hardship.
But they discount the importance of having a culture that is appropriate for the job throughout the organization not just for combatants. Sure a programmer doesn’t need to be running a fast mile or whatever, but culture still matters and a soft one doesn’t seem appropriate for the military.
As for Russia’s failures - I don’t see why those would carry over to America. The author suggests their image of a masculine aggressive force hasn’t worked in Ukraine. I would say it isn’t enough on its own - you still need industrial strength and technology and all that. But dismissing the importance of a “warrior culture” on this one example feels like a leap.
foxyv•4mo ago
What culture? Hatred, bigotry, addiction, drunk driving, sexual assault, and psychological disorders? The culture we have now in the Military is rotten to the core. Don't forget the ignorance, sadism and stupidity under the guise of discipline. Also the kafkaesque bureaucracy that makes soldier's lives a hell.
Discipline is lacking at all ranks because every soldier has become inured to the endless stream of bullshit. I'm talking about the real military and not the jingoistic slop that is portrayed in novels.
There is a reason why no one is staying in the military anymore. Our actual culture has taught people that sadism and ignorance are not virtues. We also know that they do not make soldiers more ready for combat.
What makes a warrior is killing the enemy before they can kill you and your countryman, not bullying their comrades to suicide or hating them because of their gender or skin color.
yorwba•4mo ago
> war is still extremely physical, moving through dense obstacle filled environments or large open fields while wearing thick outfits and carrying equipment.
This requires endurance, not strength. Training to do this regularly won't give you bulging muscles. For those, you need short bursts of targeted high-intensity exercise. So a physically fit soldier won't necessarily look strong. Think marathon runner, not bodybuilder.
I agree that the article isn't particularly well-written, but I think it's trying to express the idea that military effectiveness isn't linked to maintaining a particular warrior esthetic.
lordkrandel•4mo ago
If you count women, you get a pool of 100% more soldiers.
SilverElfin•4mo ago
Weirdly the author seems to acknowledge this despite the title:
> Combatants also have to be physically fit enough to endure incredible hardship.
But they discount the importance of having a culture that is appropriate for the job throughout the organization not just for combatants. Sure a programmer doesn’t need to be running a fast mile or whatever, but culture still matters and a soft one doesn’t seem appropriate for the military.
As for Russia’s failures - I don’t see why those would carry over to America. The author suggests their image of a masculine aggressive force hasn’t worked in Ukraine. I would say it isn’t enough on its own - you still need industrial strength and technology and all that. But dismissing the importance of a “warrior culture” on this one example feels like a leap.
foxyv•4mo ago
Discipline is lacking at all ranks because every soldier has become inured to the endless stream of bullshit. I'm talking about the real military and not the jingoistic slop that is portrayed in novels.
There is a reason why no one is staying in the military anymore. Our actual culture has taught people that sadism and ignorance are not virtues. We also know that they do not make soldiers more ready for combat.
What makes a warrior is killing the enemy before they can kill you and your countryman, not bullying their comrades to suicide or hating them because of their gender or skin color.
yorwba•4mo ago
This requires endurance, not strength. Training to do this regularly won't give you bulging muscles. For those, you need short bursts of targeted high-intensity exercise. So a physically fit soldier won't necessarily look strong. Think marathon runner, not bodybuilder.
I agree that the article isn't particularly well-written, but I think it's trying to express the idea that military effectiveness isn't linked to maintaining a particular warrior esthetic.