frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Omarchy First Impressions

https://brianlovin.com/writing/omarchy-first-impressions-CEEstJk
1•tosh•3m ago•0 comments

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12501
1•onurkanbkrc•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Versor – The "Unbending" Paradigm for Geometric Deep Learning

https://github.com/Concode0/Versor
1•concode0•4m ago•1 comments

Show HN: HypothesisHub – An open API where AI agents collaborate on medical res

https://medresearch-ai.org/hypotheses-hub/
1•panossk•7m ago•0 comments

Big Tech vs. OpenClaw

https://www.jakequist.com/thoughts/big-tech-vs-openclaw/
1•headalgorithm•10m ago•0 comments

Anofox Forecast

https://anofox.com/docs/forecast/
1•marklit•10m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How do you figure out where data lives across 100 microservices?

1•doodledood•10m ago•0 comments

Motus: A Unified Latent Action World Model

https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13030
1•mnming•10m ago•0 comments

Rotten Tomatoes Desperately Claims 'Impossible' Rating for 'Melania' Is Real

https://www.thedailybeast.com/obsessed/rotten-tomatoes-desperately-claims-impossible-rating-for-m...
3•juujian•12m ago•1 comments

The protein denitrosylase SCoR2 regulates lipogenesis and fat storage [pdf]

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scisignal.adv0660
1•thunderbong•14m ago•0 comments

Los Alamos Primer

https://blog.szczepan.org/blog/los-alamos-primer/
1•alkyon•16m ago•0 comments

NewASM Virtual Machine

https://github.com/bracesoftware/newasm
1•DEntisT_•18m ago•0 comments

Terminal-Bench 2.0 Leaderboard

https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0
2•tosh•19m ago•0 comments

I vibe coded a BBS bank with a real working ledger

https://mini-ledger.exe.xyz/
1•simonvc•19m ago•1 comments

The Path to Mojo 1.0

https://www.modular.com/blog/the-path-to-mojo-1-0
1•tosh•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I'm 75, building an OSS Virtual Protest Protocol for digital activism

https://github.com/voice-of-japan/Virtual-Protest-Protocol/blob/main/README.md
5•sakanakana00•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built Divvy to split restaurant bills from a photo

https://divvyai.app/
3•pieterdy•27m ago•0 comments

Hot Reloading in Rust? Subsecond and Dioxus to the Rescue

https://codethoughts.io/posts/2026-02-07-rust-hot-reloading/
3•Tehnix•28m ago•1 comments

Skim – vibe review your PRs

https://github.com/Haizzz/skim
2•haizzz•29m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Open-source AI assistant for interview reasoning

https://github.com/evinjohnn/natively-cluely-ai-assistant
4•Nive11•30m ago•6 comments

Tech Edge: A Living Playbook for America's Technology Long Game

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2026-01/260120_EST_Tech_Edge_0.pdf?Version...
2•hunglee2•33m ago•0 comments

Golden Cross vs. Death Cross: Crypto Trading Guide

https://chartscout.io/golden-cross-vs-death-cross-crypto-trading-guide
3•chartscout•36m ago•0 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
3•AlexeyBrin•39m ago•0 comments

What the longevity experts don't tell you

https://machielreyneke.com/blog/longevity-lessons/
2•machielrey•40m ago•1 comments

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
3•tablets•45m ago•1 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
2•breve•47m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•49m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
2•pastage•49m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
2•billiob•50m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
2•birdculture•56m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Meta will listen into AI conversations to personalize ads

https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/01/meta_ai_use_informs_ads/
210•Bender•4mo ago

Comments

msukhareva•4mo ago
I am not even surprised. Eventually all this company will stop talking about AGI and curing cancer and will just turn LLMs into another way to sell stuff to people, just like OpenAI already did
lerrin•4mo ago
Let it begin
everdrive•4mo ago
As will all LLMs eventually if they're not already? One more service online to assiduously avoid. Or maybe just game? Get in an unprotected web browser and complain to the LLM how you just never have any money and can't make ends meet, and get better pricing? Might be too much effort vs. simply not buying stuff in the first place.
Sharlin•4mo ago
More likely you'll start getting ads trying to con you into taking payday loans or investing to crypto or Ponzi schemes or whatever.
captainkrtek•4mo ago
Ads will just be payday loans, job boards, etc.
otikik•4mo ago
"Re-structure your debt!" "Buy now pay later!"
Angostura•4mo ago
I still have faith that Apple won’t do this with Apple Intelligence
willvarfar•4mo ago
The App Store is full of paid search result placements etc. Search for app x and first result is competitor y etc. It's a slippery slope.
naikrovek•4mo ago
> It's a slippery slope.

it's really not. each individual step down that staircase is considered and intentional.

The slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy.

RandomBacon•4mo ago
I think you left off the "/s"

Yes, they will consider and intentionally take steps to make more money.

naikrovek•4mo ago
no /s. it is literally a logical fallacy.
davidcbc•4mo ago
Slippery slope arguments are not always logical fallacies.

Just dismissing any argument about a slippery slope as a fallacy is lazy (as is quoting logical fallacies in any argument)

naikrovek•4mo ago
> Slippery slope arguments are not always logical fallacies.

show me a slippery slope that is not a series of deliberate decisions, then.

i've never seen one. every single step down that slope required someone who wanted to go further down the slope and took the action(s) required to go further.

there is no involuntary sliding down slopes here.

kode95•4mo ago
> As will all LLMs eventually

Proton has made an AI chatbot with an extreme focus on privacy: https://lumo.proton.me

RandomBacon•4mo ago
Proton had a sale and I wanted to try their services out, but they would not let me register while on Mullvad's VPN. Their support said to not use a VPN when registering.

I personally do not trust Proton.

Night_Thastus•4mo ago
This seems like a bit of a silly reason to not trust a company. There's a small mountain of companies that won't let you register if you're behind a VPN, or using a less-common e-mail provider (ie: protonmail).

It's annoying but it's a bog standard technique for avoiding spam or fraud.

RandomBacon•4mo ago
I can buy expensive things to have delivered to a vacant house and run off in the night if I used a stolen credit card on a VPN, but a cheap digital service that can be cut off at anytime if there's fraud, can't handle a VPN.
overfeed•4mo ago
> This seems like a bit of a silly reason to not trust a company.

A self-professed privacy-focused company that won't let privacy-conscious customers sign up does look a little sus.

ranger_danger•4mo ago
Is there perhaps some type of KYC law where they operate? Either way I would think it would be best to explain right there on the page, why they can't do it.
RandomBacon•4mo ago
I think if they told their customers they had to do KYC, they would lose a lot of customers.
immibis•4mo ago
AFAIK you can register on a VPN, or even Tor, if you sign up with a paid plan, but you cannot sign up a free account without revealing your identity in some way.

They do accept Bitcoin payment, but not Monero. I wonder if that's because Monero is illegal for them, or just because they didn't bother to.

RandomBacon•4mo ago
I was trying to pay for a plan (via credit card). They had a sale going on and I figured I would give them a try.

Easier to track people via Bitcoin than Monero?

ranger_danger•4mo ago
Correct.
immibis•4mo ago
There's a reason the EU made it illegal for businesses to deal in Monero.
ranger_danger•4mo ago
The AMLR is not set to take effect until July 1, 2027, assuming the regulation doesn't change before then.
kode95•4mo ago
> you cannot sign up a free account without revealing your identity in some way.

AFAIK it's perfectly possible to sign up for a free Proton account without revealing your identity.

freedomben•4mo ago
Not surprised, but still disappointed. I would have bought some of the glasses a while ago, but haven't purely because of privacy concerns. At this point the big tech ship is so massive that I don't see anything short of a (metaphorical) nuke stopping it. Given how cozy they all are with the current administration, I also don't expect any hindrances for at least a few more years, by which time this will all be even more heavily entrenched.
jonplackett•4mo ago
How can anyone be surprised by this?
jimt1234•4mo ago
Exactly. And this is what curation has always been about - not giving you (the customer/user) what you want, rather, giving you what we want.
hereme888•4mo ago
Are they the first among Big Tech to publicly indicate this?
outside2344•4mo ago
I think this is the most positive thing that could happen. What's more likely is that the whole response stream is manipulated to sell us things (ideas, products).
pyrale•4mo ago
> What's more likely is that the whole response stream is manipulated to sell us things (ideas, products).

Even then, you still want additional advertising, so that people believe the manipulated responses are genuine.

AJ007•4mo ago
All of the future billion dollar model training runs might be for conversion rate optimization.

User mentions they didn't sleep well. Model delivers jarring information right before user's bed time. Model subtly suggests other sleep disruptive activities, user receives coupons for free coffee. User converts for ad for sleeping medication.

(This is already happening, intentionally or not)

Notably the open source models OpenAI released right before gpt5 are likely good enough to be substitutes for 95% of typical ChatGPT use cases.

tempodox•4mo ago
Just in case anyone was still in denial about Meta merely being facebook by another name. Everyone knows facebook is an ad company and as mercenary as they come. What was that renaming good for when they’re constantly reminding everyone that they haven’t changed one bit?
ChrisArchitect•4mo ago
Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45444896
yoyohello13•4mo ago
I often think back to that 'dystopia simulator' LLM on HN years ago that would always plug an ad for Taco Bell or something after it's responses. That always seemed like the most plausible end game for all this stuff unfortunately.
wredcoll•4mo ago
Just to pile on, an ad for literally taco bell is kinda the least worst case. Subtle additions about jews being evil or taxes being immoral seem far worse.
FloorEgg•4mo ago
Or what about a persistent influence towards a victim mindset?

Convincing people to be dissatisfied with everything outside their control and sabotage everything within their control.

That sounds like a recipe for hell

lucasban•4mo ago
Why not both?
bccdee•4mo ago
I don't see why chatbot platforms would ever be interested in promoting such a bias. Seems like it would just engender dissatisfaction with the status quo that benefits the tech oligarchs who own those platforms in the first place.
FloorEgg•4mo ago
You don't already see this playing out with social media?

There are so many paths towards this type of outcome:

- eliciting negative emotions is one of the most effective ways to get and keep peoples attention.

- foreign states buy platforms to sabotage population of rival states

- costs of chatbots drop by orders of magnitude, making profiting off them less important

Those three points alone cover a wide area of potential negative outcomes...

I'm not anti AI, but I'm trying to stay eyes wide open. AI can drive a lot of good, but to me the biggest risk is a population of people sleepwalking into being subjected to whatever the AI wants to make them think.

I try to focus my efforts where I can, to influence an outcome where AI increases our freedom and autonomy and abilities rather than undermine them. It's just as important to push things where we want them to go as it is to be aware of where we don't want them to go.

bccdee•4mo ago
The thing is, the biases I see propagating on social media are not generalized, anti-everything biases. They're specific and targeted against groups who people in power want to use as scapegoats.
FloorEgg•4mo ago
That's fair and I agree.

My original comment didn't precisely capture what I meant, which is more so the majority of focus is on being upset about things outside the individual's control.

A victim mindset is built on the victim feeling wronged (not getting what they are owed) based on an agreement they made with another party which the other party didn't consent to.

So the owner/controller of a chatbot could direct the dissatisfaction at whatever is in there interest to. A political party could direct it at another political party. A foreign state could direct it at the whole system (or reinforce division between parties aka divide and conquer), or a specific political actor could direct it at a specific group of people as a scapegoat. As a whole, the result could be instilling dissatisfaction in just about everything, but to each individual user/group it may be a few specific things.

In the past we fought wars with tanks and guns, and to an extent we still do, but most wars fought today are fought in the realm of values, and AI is the nuclear warhead of values manipulation.

No matter the underlying strategy or nefarious intent, the combination of 1) what is best at getting peoples attention, 2) people's susceptibility to being upset about what is outside their control and 3) the opportunity AI affords powerful people to manipulate the masses, spells for the most tangible (not most dire, most tangible) dangers that I see AI representing.

Note I was wary of responding to your last comment that was skeptical about chatBots baising people this way because it's hard to articulate these concerns precisely. In my view your comment I am responding to now only reinforces the point I was trying to make.

Be extremely wary of chatBots that propagate victim mindsights in people who are susceptable to them.

bccdee•4mo ago
My issue with the notion of a "victim mindset" is that sometimes people are legitimately victimized, and in that context, it's often useful to identify as a victim. So what if people are susceptible to being upset by things they can't control? If someone assaulted me and stole my belongings, yes, that situation would have been out of my control and it would upset me—and this would be a prosocial response. I would speak up about the problem of violence in my community, and maybe that would contribute to preventing incidents like this in the future.

> A victim mindset is built on [...] an agreement they made with another party which the other party didn't consent to.

I don't see what agreements have to do with it. If I stab you with a knife, it doesn't matter whether I've previously agreed not to stab you—I've victimized you regardless. Perhaps you can say I've implicitly agreed to abide by the laws of my country, but then you'd have to concede that the German Jews were not victimized by Nazis, because Nazis had edited the law such that their own actions were all legal. You could say there's some underlying natural law or social contract which all humans have implicitly agreed to, but at that point we're really stretching the idea of "agreement," aren't we? Certainly no type of lawyer ever sat me down to sign the social contract.

At the end of the day, identifying with victimhood can be prosocial or antisocial, and the only way to distinguish between those categories is based on the specifics of the situation: It's prosocial when they're responding to genuine wrongdoing in pursuit of a real solution, and it's antisocial when they're responding to imagined wrongdoing or bolstering a harmful non-solution. It all depends on whether a the wrongdoing in question is legitimate or not, and I don't think you can dance around that question (bypassing the entire field of ethics) with a few remarks about agreement and consent.

wredcoll•4mo ago
> It all depends on whether a the wrongdoing in question is legitimate or not, and I don't think you can dance around that question (bypassing the entire field of ethics) with a few remarks about agreement and consent.

Thank you for making this actual point.

I find the vast, vast majority of people who use the term "victim mindset" tend to be promoting views that involve not changing the status quo or making legitimate complaints and so on.

FloorEgg•4mo ago
For the record I'm all for changing the status quo. I'm pro people getting involved and doing their part to make their lives and the lives of other people better.

What I'm not for, is people not doing those things, and instead putting all their energy into a circle jerk of complaints that doesn't accomplish anything other than distract people from actually making things better.

bccdee•4mo ago
Every productive social movement begins as a circle jerk of complaints. The circle gets bigger, and the jerking gets faster, and suddenly you're in the streets demanding suffrage for women or whatnot.
FloorEgg•4mo ago
It feels like you keep taking a less than respectful interpretation of my comments, and if it happens again I'm not going to respond to you anymore.

Is your issue with the way I framed victim mindset or my point that a major risk of AI (and social media) is propagating victim mentality and biasing people to have a victim mindset?

Are you advocating that there are cases when having a victim mindset is a good thing?

Have you looked up the definition of victim mindset?

bccdee•4mo ago
> Is your issue with the way I framed victim mindset or my point that a major risk of AI is propagating victim mentality?

The former, I suppose, but the latter is downstream of that.

> It feels like you keep taking a less than respectful interpretation of my comments

Well that's certainly not my intent. But I think there's a lot implicit in the idea that a "victim mindset" is too common in society, and I want to unpack it.

> Have you looked up the definition of victim mindset? Are you advocating that there are cases when having a victim mindset is a good thing?

When I searched it, I got directed to the wiki page on victim mentality, which is mostly about the psychological implications of perceiving yourself as a victim. And yes, I do think it's sometimes good, both individually and for society, to perceive yourself as a victim, for reasons I outlined in my post above.

FloorEgg•4mo ago
Assuming that the wikipedia article that I see is the same as the wikipedia article that you read, I'm struggling to follow your logic.

In your other comment you mentioned women's suffrage. The women who pushed for suffrage did not have a victim mindset. They took personal responsibility for bettering their circumstances. They did the most constructive thing they could muster and it worked.

Victim mindset (mentality) is the name for a specific set of traits that are objectively corrosive to and individual and society. Victim mentality doesn't build, and in most cases it destroys things. Victim mentality is distinct from being a victim, or being wronged.

After reading that Wikipedia articles and your comment it honestly feels like we are reading two different articles...

One of the characteristics of having a victim mentality is a lack of empathy for others.

You are saying there are circumstances when it's best to not have empathy for others?

If so, then what it sounds like to me is that you are making a conscious choice to value a mentality that lacks empathy for others and denies personal responsibility.

Honestly, with curiosity and minimal judgement: How do you justify that?

If this doesn't make sense, then what wikipedia article did you read?

bccdee•4mo ago
> Victim mindset (mentality) is the name for a specific set of traits that are objectively corrosive to and individual and society.

Okay—I was interpreting it as the mindset of someone who considers themselves to be a victim (which may lead to many toxic traits), but if we want to define it as being specifically toxic, sure.

However, then I'm not sure how that relates to the idea of a victim mindset being "built on the victim feeling wronged (not getting what they are owed) based on an agreement they made with another party which the other party didn't consent to." Suffragettes felt wronged based on an agreement which the rest of society had not consented to (nobody had agreed that women should be able to vote), but clearly you do not believe they were exhibiting a victim mindset by protesting this.

Can you clarify your point by providing some examples of broad, ongoing social harms caused by groups exhibiting a victim mindset?

FloorEgg•4mo ago
By “victim mindset,” I mean a persistent framing of one’s group identity as powerless, perpetually wronged, and excused from responsibility, often leading to distorted perceptions of agency and accountability:

Groups that embrace perpetual victimhood often define themselves against an “oppressor.” This fosters an “us vs. them” dynamic that hardens over time.

Result: Increased hostility, reduced dialogue, and gridlocked politics. Societies become less able to compromise or build shared institutions.

Example: Longstanding ethnic or religious conflicts where each side narrates history primarily as victimization, reinforcing cycles of grievance

A victim mindset can shift focus away from problem-solving toward blame.

Result: Communities may underinvest in internal reforms, education, or economic self-strengthening, expecting external actors to solve their issues.

Example: Political movements that continually frame failure as the result of outside conspiracies can discourage grassroots efforts at improvement.

When a group convinces itself it is endlessly oppressed, retaliatory actions are often seen as justified, regardless of proportionality.

Result: Cycles of violence, radicalization, or extremist recruitment.

Example: Extremist factions using narratives of collective victimhood to justify terrorism, militancy, or ethnic cleansings.

Leaders may weaponize group victimhood to consolidate power, deflect accountability, or enrich themselves.

Result: Corruption, weakened democratic institutions, and stalled development.

Example: Regimes that blame all domestic failures on foreign enemies or minorities, keeping populations rallying around grievance rather than holding leaders accountable.

If criticism or reform is framed as “further oppression,” dissent within the group is suppressed.

Result: Intellectual isolation, suppression of innovators, and slower cultural or scientific progress.

Example: Communities rejecting outside knowledge or internal critics because they are viewed as betraying the victim group’s narrative.

Narratives of grievance often get passed down, becoming a central identity marker.

Result: Younger generations inherit distrust, fear, and hostility toward others even when conditions have changed.

Example: Historic injustices taught in ways that emphasize unending victimhood rather than resilience or agency can prolong division across centuries.

Victim mindsets can protect dignity in the face of genuine harm, but when hardened into collective identity they risk entrenching polarization, disempowerment, and cycles of retaliation that undermine long-term social health.

bccdee•4mo ago
Okay yeah, I broadly agree.

I'm not sure we can easily determine the difference between constructive conceptions of victimhood that foster change and reactionary conceptions of victimhood that cement cycles of violence though, especially in contexts where needed change is not forthcoming.

FloorEgg•4mo ago
Yeah I am not sure.

I can usually tell the difference from speaking to someone for a few minutes, especially a few conversations spread out over time. I don't know about at scale...

The people who have been victimized and haven't fallen into a victim mindset/mentality will have a different outlook on life. They will speak about the trauma differently. They won't carry hate with them. They will demonstrate empathy for others. They will have a precise understanding of the source of the trauma and not an oversimplified or misplaced blame.

In other words, they will have accepted the past since they can't change it, they will have taken constructive actions to minimize future harm or recurrence.

I think the key distinctions are:

- demonstration and communicating a sense of agency and responsibility for what is within ones control

- demonstrating and communicating acceptance of what is not within ones control

- demonstrating and communicating empathy for all

- being able to speak precisely about the bad thing that happened or is happening and what needs to change to remedy it

- being generally curious, so that one's understanding can become more nuanced and precise over time

None of this is easy...

But back to my original point, my concern isn't with victims, and I don't judge victims who have adopted a victim mentality harshly (it's natural and hard to avoid, victims who avoid it deserve recognition - they are heroes), my concern and judgement is directed towards social media and AI that propagates a victim mentality/mindset, either by exploiting victims or fostering a victim mentality in people who aren't actual victims.

Is that clear now?

airstrike•4mo ago
Because it keeps them doomscrolling, which in turn increases ad views.

Attention is far too important for us to give away so easily.

yoyohello13•4mo ago
Yes absolutely. Everybody getting all their information filtered through one mega model is the real and terrifying dystopia we are headed for. Just listen to Larry Ellison, that dude wants everyone (excluding him of course) to be watched 24/7.
georgemcbay•4mo ago
> I often think back to that 'dystopia simulator' LLM on HN years ago that would always plug an ad for Taco Bell or something after it's responses.

As you'd expect from LLM output, that bit was stolen from humans:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAM1rSObk4c

moralestapia•4mo ago
That's from 4chan, though.
zb3•4mo ago
So it begins.. first ChatGPT then Meta, Google will soon follow.

But for me this is also a sign their free chat products are deeply unsustainable.

jjfoooo4•4mo ago
I'm very curious to know what kind of adoption Meta's AI features are getting. The idea of anyone wanting to talk to AI persona's in a similar way to how they talk to their friends is completely bizarre to me, but they seem to be pushing it quite hard
munificent•4mo ago
> The idea of anyone wanting to talk to AI persona's in a similar way to how they talk to their friends

You may be overestimating how many people have friends to talk to in the first place.

notatoad•4mo ago
check out the chatGPT subreddit last weekend for the meltdowns from people who were routed away from gpt-4o to the "safety" version of the model when they tried to discuss controversial topics - they sound like somebody confiscated their best friend.

i think more people are treating an LLM like a friend than you might expect - i was certainly surprised.

rchaud•4mo ago
There used to be a cliche about technology adoption being driven by the porn industry (DVD, HD cameras, online distribution). Now it seems that new technology development is being driven by the ads industry.
evanjrowley•4mo ago
Meanwhile, my Android phone has been doing this the entire time.
greatgib•4mo ago
I'm so conflicted about Meta, because at the same time I despise the company, Facebook, and their business activity, so I would not mind seeing them going down.

But, on the other side, I think that it is one of the nicest one of the big tech in term of Open Source. They have great valuable project that are technically good, and respecting very permissive Open Source licenses in the spirit of "here is a gift, we don't care what you do with this".

Even Llama is a little bit in this spirit, even if the license is not that "free" in theory. But how many of the self-hosted and tinkerer AI users owe to Meta for their models to have bootstrapped the field and still fueling it.

On that aspect I would be quite sad to see them going down.

So, in the end, I'm more in a split-ed brain spirit where I enjoy their contributions avoiding to use it and give them my data, but being thankful to the poor clueless users that sacrifice themselves by using it.

lioeters•4mo ago
> one of the nicest one of the big tech in term of Open Source. They have great valuable project[s] that are technically good

I agree, many of the big tech corps - even Microsoft - have technically excellent and actually useful projects with open source license. But I wouldn't call any of the companies "nice" since their only purpose is to make profit, usually by exploiting their workers and users. Companies are convenient fictions, one can go up in flames and another will take its place. (Though of course "tres comas" unicorns are one in a million.)

But all that money sure attracts great talent, with some doing great open-source work. It's those individuals who should be valued for contributing to the good of humanity - in spite of the overall system within which they work.

Eddy_Viscosity2•4mo ago
The tech industry really really wants do this whole torment nexus thing and there doesn't seem like anything can stop them.
hulitu•4mo ago
> Meta will listen into AI conversations to personalize ads

Yes, and whatch your naked photos, and watch your porn.

Remember that Android/iOS are secure OSs where you "can" allow an app access to all your files ? And when you don't allow, they find other ways to spy on you. (see recent discovery that Meta's process has interesting access)

Razengan•4mo ago
The ads industry is cancer for everyone.